Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dear Nebraska: Sorry about water, but more on the way. Love, Montana

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Fledermaus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 05:16 PM
Original message
Dear Nebraska: Sorry about water, but more on the way. Love, Montana
The flood begins higher up, at places like Dark Horse Lake in the Bitterroots, where another 2 inches of snow fell late this week, landing on the 8 feet still on the ground.

And when hot weather finally reaches those upper elevations -- starting next month -- all of that snow will melt and flow and become, eventually, the floodwaters threatening Sioux City and Omaha and Plattsmouth and so many other river towns downstream.............

Those downstream states have more than enough water now. But so does Montana.

"People who have been here 50 years, 70 years, say they haven't seen anything like this," Gay said. "All small streams, creeks are full. There are towns that are flooded and cut off. And there's a lot of water to come."

The snow-water equivalent in some areas is 400 percent; meaning, snow that usually is 2 feet deep this time of year is 8 feet, something that happens maybe once every 50 years, Brusda said.

And as the snow-fed Missouri crosses Montana, it's collecting record rainfall, too. Some areas received 10 inches in three weeks; 3 inches fell on a town in northeast Montana between Thursday and Friday.

The rain is expected to continue through the weekend. An even stronger storm system could surface next week.

http://journalstar.com/news/state-and-regional/nebraska/article_0dcb3ea6-3091-56c8-afcc-2a2476b9ed5b.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ro roh....that is not good news for the nuclear plant in Neb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Just what I was thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Actually, the plant isn't even operating now.
They shut it down in April for refueling and won't start it up again until after the river recedes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newfie11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. thanks for sharing Montana
I have to say here in western NE panhandle our problem is from WY.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. It is all Cheney's fault!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newfie11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. yes!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voice for Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. if they can build oil pipelines from alaska to wherever
why can't they move water from the places where there is too much, to the places where there is severe drought?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IDemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-18-11 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. Not exactly correct on the snow-water equivalent
Eight feet versus two would be correct if all snow contained the same amount of water, but it doesn't. It refers to the water level that would be seen if a snowpack were melted simultaneously. Dry powder may have a snow water density of only 5%, whereas a heavy wet spring snow may be around 50%. If they have 400 percent of a normal SWE year, that's a massive amount of water to come with rivers already at or near flood stage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC