Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US Nuclear Commissioners Have Voted On Fate Of Yucca Mountain

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 01:25 PM
Original message
US Nuclear Commissioners Have Voted On Fate Of Yucca Mountain
US Nuclear Commissioners Have Voted On Fate Of Yucca Mountain
By Tennille Tracy, Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

WASHINGTON -(Dow Jones)- U.S. nuclear commissioners said Wednesday that they have voted on the Obama administration's request to abandon a nuclear waste project at Yucca Mountain, Nev., appearing to contradict recent statements by the chairman of the U.S. nuclear agency suggesting the commissioners were still debating the issue.

The news escalates a years-long debate over Yucca Mountain and fuels a Republican-led effort to scrutinize the recent actions of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, which is responsible for deciding the fate of Yucca Mountain.

The NRC was asked to vote on the controversial Yucca Mountain project after the Energy Department submitted a request to abandon the project in March 2010.

Republicans have accused NRC Chairman Gregory Jaczko of intentionally delaying a vote on Yucca Mountain, questioning whether Jaczko is unwilling to let the project move forward.

Before becoming ...

http://www.nasdaq.com/aspx/stock-market-news-story.aspx?storyid=201105041212dowjonesdjonline000462&title=us-nuclear-commissioners-have-voted-on-fate-of-yucca-mountain

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
buddysmellgood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. How odd. They voted but aren't giving the result?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Possibly some time back.
Aren't there only five commissioners?

So when Jaczo says he's "working to develop a majority" can that possibly mean there's a tie? Or does it hint that the majority is against him and he's trying to fight to keep it from coming out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. The NRC is stacked with shills
There are supposed to be 5 commissioners, but under Bush there were only 3 because he wanted to keep the deck stacked.
Dale Klein resigned so Obama had 3 appointments and he made sure the commission remained stacked by appointing Magwood.
See http://pogoblog.typepad.com/pogo/2010/02/nrc-needs-nuclear-power-regulators-not-promoters.html
and http://nukefree.org/news/NEWSIGN-ONLETTERTOPRESIDENTOBAMAONNRCCOMMISSIONERS

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Are they senate confirmed?
If so... What remains of your point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. I've been wondering - is there anybody advocating some other location?
I've read a fair amount on the pros and cons of Yucca. I've read literally nothing about any proposed alternatives. I assume there was some kind of list of candidates that Yucca itself was chosen from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-04-11 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. 5 locations were proposed, there were supposed to be 3 dumps by now - it was forced on Nevada
Edited on Wed May-04-11 07:27 PM by bananas
IIRC, there were 5 locations proposed
Nobody wanted it so they all maneuvered politically to be excluded.
Yucca was left holding the bag.
It was forced on Nevada against their will,
that's why they call it the "Screw Nevada" bill.

Also the "scientists" working on Yucca faked their reports, it was a big scandal.
edit to add: that's one reason nobody wants it - they know that you just can't trust the nuclear industry.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC