Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Western U.S. Grid Can Handle More Renewables--without expensive backup generation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 05:17 AM
Original message
Western U.S. Grid Can Handle More Renewables--without expensive backup generation
Technology Review by MIT

by Kevin Bullis

More than a third of the electricity in the western United States could come from wind and solar power without installing significant amounts of backup power. And most of this expansion of renewable energy could be done without installing new interstate transmission lines, according to a new study from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) in Golden, CO. But the study says increasing the amount of renewables on the grid will require smart planning and cooperation between utilities.

The NREL findings provide a strong counterargument to the idea that the existing power grid is insufficient to handle increasing amounts of renewable power. As California and other states require utilities to use renewable sources for significant fractions of their electricity, some experts have warned that measures to account for the variability of wind and solar power could be costly. At the extreme, they speculated, every megawatt of wind installed could require a megawatt of readily available conventional power in case the wind stopped blowing. But the NREL findings, like other recent studies, suggest that the costs could be minimal, especially in the West.

"The studies are showing the costs are a lot lower than what people thought they were going to be," says Daniel Brooks, project manager for power delivery and utilization at the Electric Power Research Institute. Even if wind farms had to pay for the necessary grid upgrades and backup power themselves, they could still sell electricity at competitive rates, he says.

NREL considered a scenario in which 30 percent of the total electricity produced in a year in western states comes from wind turbines and 5 percent comes from solar power--mostly from solar thermal plants that generate power by concentrating sunlight to produce high temperatures and steam. The researchers assumed the solar thermal plants would have some form of heat storage, although not all planned plants do. The study used detailed data about wind speeds, solar irradiance, and the operation of the electrical grid. GE Energy researchers commissioned by NREL then used the data to simulate the impact of various scenarios for wind and solar power use.

The researchers found that one way to keep the number of new backup power plants to a minimum is to expand the geographical area that renewable energy is gathered from, says Debra Lew, the NREL project manager in charge of the study. If utilities can call on wind farms and solar power from several states, rather than just from the local area, a drop in wind in one area is likely to be offset by an increase in wind elsewhere, and solar panels shaded by clouds in one area will be offset by others in sunny areas.


That makes it far less necessary to have conventional power plants standing by to make up for drops in power. The NREL study estimated that drawing only on local resources would increase variability on the grid by a factor of 50. That's "a huge increase," Lew says, too big for a local utility to balance using backup power and other resources. If you aggregate resources over several states, the increase is less than a factor of two.
...more...
http://www.technologyreview.com/energy/25397/?nlid=3052&a=f
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 05:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Froward69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. kick for sunshine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. Handle more? COULD? COULD? COULD? Why no mention of PHASING OUT dangerous fossil fuels?
Because at the end of the day, the "renewables will save us" COULD squad, that in the last eight years of rhetoric hear has offered few posts that didn't have a conditional tense or an outright soothsaying line of bull, depends entirely on continued access to dangerous fossil fuels.

The result of this "could" philosophy is pretty clear, stripped mountains, ruined seas, carbon dioxide build up etc.

Gasoline is NOT magically transformed into benign and acceptable material just because someone puts some (usually small) percent ethanol in it, particularly when more people are demanding more of the task gasoline performs: Propelling people around aimlessly and often unnecessarily to do stuff like drive to rock concerts to show concern about climate change.

In the electricity case, I have long felt that the solar industry, to name just one, would be incapable of supporting even the servers dedicated to arguing how great solar could be, never mind what it is.

Fossil fuels are not acceptable. The task is not the equivalent of an alcoholic claiming that he can cut down to just 1 glass of Allen's coffee brandy per day after consuming a bottle a day, and then announcing he is no longer an alcoholic. It's not "beer is better than vodka," or "Pot is better than heroin."

The task before humanity is to eliminate fossil fuels, not to try endlessly to palliate them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. And we the people must help to make it happen - E Pluribus Energy Unum
Much of the problem in replacing conventional power rests on the premise that Americans MUST have a computer in one hand, a cell phone in the other & be driving a gas-guzzler with their knees. Everyone their giant fridge, electric can-opener & thermostatically controlled wine cellar.

We can easily lessen our energy requirements without giving up the good stuff. Every video game & latte machine is spending American lives & well-being. Which of us would ask our young people to die or be blinded or worse so we could have a big screen TV in every bedroom?

Raj Patel outlines beautifully the large difference between cost & value. Let the environmental scientists & engineers do their work & we can do ours. Thanks muchly for posting this, I want to pass it along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diane in sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 02:55 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I have a giant fridge--it uses 1/5 the power my old, small fridge did. Household
and personal comfort can be provided with about 1/10 the power we use now by engineering efficiency into our homes, autos, and appliances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Large centralized thermal generation is a recipe for waste.
The business model behind delivering electricity from a large centralized thermal generating facility presumes ever higher levels of energy consumption to be a good thing. It requires some very creative policy thinking to provide incentives for a company like a utility to campaign to sell LESS of their product instead of more.

By moving to distributed generation with renewables we restructure the entire conceptual basis behind energy use.

Download Lovins' 1977 article, "The Road not Taken"
http://www.rmi.org/rmi/Library/E77-01_EnergyStrategyRoadNotTaken
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC