Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did D.C.'s blizzard bury climate change legislation?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-14-10 01:06 AM
Original message
Did D.C.'s blizzard bury climate change legislation?
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/12/AR2010021203910.html

Did D.C.'s blizzard bury climate change legislation?

Sunday, February 14, 2010

The Post asked political and environmental experts whether the record snowstorms buried climate change legislation this year. Below, responses from Christine Todd Whitman, Kenneth P. Green and Steven F. Hayward, David G. Hawkins, Douglas E. Schoen, Emily Figdor and Ed Rogers.

...

CHRISTINE TODD WHITMAN

It shouldn't, but it will. Among the reasons winter storms will make this issue more politically challenging are overreach and simplification -- on both sides of the debate. "An Inconvenient Truth" brought the issue of climate change to the fore, but many of the charts implying that the world's end is near were overly dramatic.

...

KENNETH P. GREEN AND STEVEN F. HAYWARD

The corpus of climate legislation was already cooling before Snowmageddon. The cold wind that buried its chances this year didn't come off the snow burying Washington: It came off horrific unemployment reports, lackluster economic growth, massive Tea Party rallies and vicious town hall meetings. After the breakdown in Copenhagen, the explosion of "Climategate" and the election of Scott Brown, the Democrats' rapid pivot to focus on jobs was inevitable.

...

DAVID G. HAWKINS

Just as a group of cancer-free, cigarette-smoking 75-year-olds does not disprove that smoking causes cancer, a handful of snowstorms does not counter the massive evidence that we are changing the Earth's climate. What is that evidence? We know the gases produced when we burn fossil fuels trap heat in the atmosphere; emissions of those gases have grown enormously in the past 100 years; the concentrations of those gases in the atmosphere have grown in lock step; global average temperatures have increased over the same period, and natural influences on temperature can explain only a small fraction of that increase. We also know that the resulting changes in climate have already had detectible impacts on ecosystems, droughts, precipitation patterns and other features important to human well-being. People who hype the snowstorms to oppose action on climate are charlatans.

...

DOUGLAS E. SCHOEN

The recent bout of wintry weather and the overall political climate have almost certainly killed climate-change legislation this year.

...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sharesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-14-10 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. No, it was the claimed evidence of hoax contained in hacked e-mails.
Dear Oklahoma: Fire Inhofe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-14-10 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. No. It was long dead before that.
The economy killed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Croquist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-14-10 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Agreed
As I posted 6 or more months ago, the economy will always trump the environment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Birthmark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-14-10 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. Every year we waste is lost
And we have no idea if this is a critical year, a year that pushes us past a "tipping point." Every delay is a roll of the dice --which appear at this point to be loaded against us. The reason we delay makes no difference to the physics involved. If we don't cut our contribution to GW *fast* we are going to be in very serious trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timeforpeace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-14-10 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. Changing it from Global Warming to Climate Change signaled it was dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-15-10 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Scientists certainly aren't known for their skills at wordsmithing
And they keep lousy records. They should all have assistants who help them with the day to day tasks of communicating and keeping track of what they are doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC