Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iowa State researchers use fungus to improve corn-to-ethanol process- reduce energy use by 1/3rd.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
JohnWxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 02:23 PM
Original message
Iowa State researchers use fungus to improve corn-to-ethanol process- reduce energy use by 1/3rd.
Edited on Thu Aug-07-08 02:25 PM by JohnWxy
http://www.public.iastate.edu/~nscentral/news/2008/may/fungus.shtml


AMES, Iowa -- Growing microscopic fungus in some of the leftovers from ethanol production can save energy, recycle more water and improve the livestock feed that's a co-product of fuel production, according to a team of researchers from Iowa State University and the University of Hawai'i.

"The process could change ethanol production in dry-grind plants so much that energy costs can be reduced by as much as one-third," said Hans van Leeuwen, an Iowa State professor of civil, construction and environmental engineering and the leader of the research project.

~~
Van Leeuwen said all of that can save United States ethanol producers a lot of energy and money at current production levels:

Eliminating the need to evaporate thin stillage would save ethanol plants up to $800 million a year in energy costs.

Allowing more water recycling would reduce the industry's water consumption by as much as 10 billion gallons per year. And it allows producers to recycle enzymes in the thin stillage, saving about $60 million per year.

Adding value and nutrients to the livestock feed produced by ethanol plants would grow the market for that feed by about $400 million per year.

And the researchers' fungal process would improve the energy balance of ethanol production by reducing energy inputs so there is more of an energy gain.

(a one third reduction of energy inputs would produce an increase in Net ENergy Gain of 50%_JW).


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Putting anthrax in our tanks now...wow!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
excess_3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-07-08 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. better than petroleum from the Middle East .n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC