Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Biobased chemical feedstock plants closing around the world: Except in China.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 04:31 PM
Original message
Biobased chemical feedstock plants closing around the world: Except in China.
Edited on Sat Jan-26-08 04:32 PM by NNadir
This brief thread applies to the biologically produced compound furfural.

Furfural is a chemical intermediate that was once important in the production of nylon and a number of other polymers, including some polyurethanes. (Furfural is converted to 1,4 butanediol in this process.) The original process for making industrial furfural used corn cobs and oat hulls as feedstocks and is known as the Quaker Oats processes. These biological waste materials contain significant quantities of pentosans - 5 carbon sugars - which are effectively dehydrated to give furfural, also known as 2-furan-carboxaldehyde. Furfural can be decarboxylated (made to give a molecule of carbon dioxide) to give furan, and furan can be hydrogenated to give tetrahydrofuran. It is also possible to make 1,4 butane diol from furfural, and, in this form, it was used to make nylon and other stuff.

It is interesting to note that when biologically based furfural is made into polyurethanes (and other polymers) effectively this is a form of carbon sequestration.

So what's the problem?

Um, well, the problem is that the process is not particularly economic. For many years a process using natural gas and petroleum products has been used to make 1,4 butane diol from butadiene, which is famously used in tire manufacture.

It seems kind of sad in a way, doesn't it?

Well, there is some hope: With petroleum prices rising, the biobased polymer may have a future, especially with a recent process improvement reported by a Thai chemist about a process developed by Chinese chemists:

http://www.journal.au.edu/au_techno/2005/apr05/vol8no4_abstract04.pdf

An excerpt of the report:

In theory, any material containing pentosans can be used for the production of
furfural. Technically furfural is produced by acid hydrolysis of the pentosan contained in woody biomass. Almost all furfural plants employing the batch process use the Quaker Oats technology developed in the 1920’s. They all operate at less than 50% yield, needs a lot of steam and generate plenty of effluent waste. Moreover their operating costs are high. Hence such plants throughout the world are closing, with the exception of simple low cost Chinese plants (Dalin Yebo Trading 2004).

Some have resorted to continuous processes. Westpro modified Chinese Huaxia Furfural Technology is an example of a leading current continuous process furfural technology (Westpro 2004). It uses fixed-bed reactors and continuous dynamic refining, which gives high yields of furfural, including byproducts, at low production costs. The technology requires only low capital investment and is thus especially suited for developing countries...


Technical details are included.

Good stuff.

It is worth noting in this context that one of the world's original plastics, cellophane, was wood based.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks! You may recall furfural is a compound dear to my own heart ...
and one of the examples of ag-waste products I like to cite (the others being acetone and 1-butanol, both of which are now made from petroleum ... **SIGH***).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Well, I think we will see a return to biobased feedstocks of this type.
Edited on Sun Jan-27-08 12:21 AM by NNadir
There's also been a lot of work done over the years on syn gas from biologicals, which is, I think, a superior approach to fermentation.

I'm not sure I recall your furfural posts, but I'm sure they were very good.

The system seems really cool, and I like it that it can operate in rural, poor areas using a continuous process.

I never realized before today that the Quaker Oats process had yields below 50%. I looked into the matter because I was thinking about batch processes because of the alleged $1/gallon ethanol.

As for the one buck a gallon ethanol, I'll believe it when I see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-26-08 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yeah, I didn't know about the 50% yield either. Bummer.
I had big questions about that $1/gallon EtOH, but Wired is not the source to answer them, evidently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC