Let's see. The number of people killed by radiation related events from this vast "tragedy": Zero.
Below, we'll refer to the
current scientific literature, published just a few weeks ago, from the mortality from ships. Now, because ignorance has prevailed in Germany, and new nuclear power has been banned, Germany has contracted to buy hundred million ton quantities of coal from South Africa.
Just shipping it will kill tens of thousands of people, but in fact, the anti-nuke religion couldn't care less. Things like that just lead to calls for another whollop of Allen's Coffee Brandy.
It's pretty funny that we can get the paid (off) anti-nuke religion to go into a paroxysm of terror and fear from failed computer theft, resulting from a 451 word account from the NY Times. Somebody call Amory Lovins. It's the death knell of nuclear power in Africa!
We all know the NY Times and it's wonderful record on reporting on African nuclear issues. I mean how long as it been since little Scooter's girlfriend, Judy Miller, whipped a paraoxysm of
murder by reporting that "Saddam Hussein is buying uranium in Niger!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
Oooooh boy. Other classics that have found their way in to the pages of the New York Times - which regularly reports the death of nuclear power - is the good ole' "plutonium is the most toxic substance known!" bit. The scientific source for this bit of powerful insight? Um, Ralph Nader. Ralph Nader's scientific research on the subject? Oh he didn't bother to do any research at all. In fact, he didn't know what he was talking about, so he made stuff up.
Now, there's a full scientific paper that goes with this abstract:
http://pubs.acs.org/cgi-bin/sample.cgi/esthag/asap/abs/es071686z.html and the paper has all sorts of maps showing Northern Europe as one of the most effected places, but let's not try to get the anti-nuke religion to look at science, since clearly science and religion don't mix.
The abstract in one sentence says it all:
Our results indicate that shipping-related PM emissions are responsible for approximately 60,000 cardiopulmonary and lung cancer deaths annually, with most deaths occurring near coastlines in Europe, East Asia, and South Asia. Under current regulation and with the expected growth in shipping activity, we estimate that annual mortalities could increase by 40% by 2012.
So we'll just pile this 24,000
additional deaths on the pile of deaths about which the anti-nuke religion couldn't care less.
Heckuva job, anti-nukes! Heckuva a job!
In fact, the anti-nukes remind me of claustrophobes, since their fears are irrational and personal and there is no talking them out of their fears because it's not about reality at all. However, those of us who
are rational note that claustophobes do
not go around vandalizing and destroying the little huts of poor people because the little huts induce such fear. Would that it were so for the anti-nukes, but no, the anti-nukes want everyone else to pay for their paranoia.
The conceit of the anti-nukes, a vicious murderous bunch if you cut away the window trappings and their little yuppie consumerist crapola, is that
only nuclear energy need be risk free. They couldn't care less who dies because nuclear power is
not used - and note - there is NOT ONE illiterate anti-nuke who can produce a case of a single death from nuclear power in Germany, never mind 10,000 such deaths
per year. And mind you, I'm not even talking about the people who will die from burning the coal, but only the people who will die from delivering it to the anti-nuke Germans, who were inspired to kill by the paid (off) anti-nuke Gazprom executive Gerhard Schroeder.
There is no such thing, of course, as risk free energy. There is only risk minimized energy. That energy is nuclear energy.
There is really nothing more absurd than an anti-nuke evoking South Africa. Apparently the anti-nuke religion feels no shame, and that's pathetic.