Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Climate Change: The Worst Can Still Be Avoided (IPCC)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 08:25 AM
Original message
Climate Change: The Worst Can Still Be Avoided (IPCC)
http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=40025

MADRID, Nov 12 (IPS) - Climate change is not inexorable, if measures are adopted immediately, said scientists and government officials as the 27th session of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) began Monday in Spain.

The meeting in the Mediterranean city of Valencia, which will end Saturday, has drawn hundreds of experts from some 130 countries. Participants were welcomed by an enormous 400 square metre banner hung up on the outside of the building by international environmental watchdog Greenpeace, reading "Warning: Save the Climate Now".

Javier González, with the Spanish NGO Ecologistas en Acción, told IPS that there is not much to study and discuss, because it is already clear what must be done: "the only solution is to reduce consumption of energy and other resources that are consumed at obscene levels."

"Some segments of society in the countries of the developing South and practically everyone in the industrialised North consume unnecessary things: excessive packaging and advertising mailers for products, excessive gasoline in countries where cars habitually carry just one person, the lights on day and night unnecessarily, homes with several TV sets, etc, etc," he said.

<more>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. We got our consumption down to 400 kW*hour/month
I have a hunch that a lot of the packaging of products is "loss prevention". Shoplifters cannot stuff a giant PETE plastic box that contains a small product into their shirt sleeve. What would be the solution? Put the products behind the counter and hire another sales clerk to retrieve them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. This is a message that must be heard
There are those who believe no action is necessary, because "global warming" doesn't exist.

There are also those who believe no action is worth taking, because the effects of "global warming" cannot be tempered.

Neither attitude is reasonable to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-15-07 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. First, their report is already a joke for being far too tepid in it's predictions
that were outstripped even before the thing was printed, NOW they want us to believe this.

Sorry, no sale. Not that it could ever happen like that, anyway.

Primates. We are such funny creatures. So hopeful, so able to slip into denial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. "the worst" is kind of relative now, isn't it...
I mean last week, the worst was keeping global temps from going to 3 degrees higher. Now, it's reported that we are going to go to 3 degrees by the end of the century. So is the worst now mean going to 4 degrees?

folks, once the temp hits 3 degrees we get full on positive feed back. It's like the geometric progression of CO2 in the atmosphere. Things begin to really accelerate at that point.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-16-07 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. "immediately"
We keep using that word. I don't think it means what we think it means.

All the things going on today are the consequences of what we've been doing for years, decades, not just what we did yesterday.

Who or what is going to A) define what "unnecessary things" are, and B) enforce that definition? We have a global economy that requires growth that has been gathering momentum for...I don't know...at least a few thousand years. Who is going to stop that? Let alone stopping it without anyone getting caught in the net like fish. If we can still remember what fish are.

You have to choose to stop. Nobody can wait for corporations or governments to stop for us. They can't. Everything about those institutions requires growth. Everything. People have to stop on their own, you can't force them. To enable force(militarily, physically, economically, whatever) would require growth. We're not getting out of this easy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC