Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NASA - 23% Decline In Perennial Sea Ice Extent During Past Two Winters

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 12:49 PM
Original message
NASA - 23% Decline In Perennial Sea Ice Extent During Past Two Winters
Mods: press release.

BBSNews 2007-10-08 -- (NASA) A new NASA-led study found a 23-percent loss in the extent of the Arctic's thick, year-round sea ice cover during the past two winters. This drastic reduction of perennial winter sea ice is the primary cause of this summer's fastest-ever sea ice retreat on record and subsequent smallest-ever extent of total Arctic coverage.

A team led by Son Nghiem of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif., studied trends in Arctic perennial ice cover by combining data from NASA's Quick Scatterometer (QuikScat) satellite with a computing model based on observations of sea ice drift from the International Arctic Buoy Programme. QuikScat can identify and map different classes of sea ice, including older, thicker perennial ice and younger, thinner seasonal ice. Between winter 2005 and winter 2007, the perennial ice shrunk by an area the size of Texas and California combined. This severe loss continues a trend of rapid decreases in perennial ice extent in this decade. Study results will be published Oct. 4 in the journal Geophysical Research Letters.

The scientists observed less perennial ice cover in March 2007 than ever before, with the thick ice confined to the Arctic Ocean north of Canada. Consequently, the Arctic Ocean was dominated by thinner seasonal ice that melts faster. This ice is more easily compressed and responds more quickly to being pushed out of the Arctic by winds. Those conditions facilitated the ice loss, leading to this year's record low amount of total Arctic sea ice.

Nghiem said the rapid decline in winter perennial ice the past two years was caused by unusual winds. "Unusual atmospheric conditions set up wind patterns that compressed the sea ice, loaded it into the Transpolar Drift Stream and then sped its flow out of the Arctic," he said. When that sea ice reached lower latitudes, it rapidly melted in the warmer waters.

"The winds causing this trend in ice reduction were set up by an unusual pattern of atmospheric pressure that began at the beginning of this century," Nghiem said.

The Arctic Ocean's shift from perennial to seasonal ice is preconditioning the sea ice cover there for more efficient melting and further ice reductions each summer. The shift to seasonal ice decreases the reflectivity of Earth's surface and allows more solar energy to be absorbed in the ice-ocean system.

The perennial sea ice pattern change was deduced by using the buoy computing model infused with 50 years of data from drifting buoys and measurement camps to track sea ice movement around the Arctic Ocean. From the 1970s through the 1990s, perennial ice declined by about 193,000 square miles each decade. Since 2000, that rate of decline has nearly tripled.

Results from the buoy model were verified against the past eight years of QuikScat observations, which have much better resolution and coverage. The QuikScat data were verified with field experiments conducted aboard the U.S. Coast Guard icebreaker Healy as well as by sea ice charts derived from multiple satellite data sources by analysts at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's National Ice Center in Suitland, Md.

The new study differs significantly from other recent studies that only looked at the Arctic's total sea ice extent. "Our study applies QuikScat's unique capabilities to examine how the composition of Arctic sea ice is changing, which is crucial to understanding Arctic sea ice mass balance and overall Arctic climate stability," Nghiem said.

Pablo Clemente-Colin of the National Ice Center said the rapid reduction of Arctic perennial sea ice requires an urgent reassessment of sea ice forecast model predictions and of potential impacts to local weather and climate, as well as shipping and other maritime operations in the region. "Improving ice forecast models will require new physical insights and understanding of complex Arctic processes and interactions."

Other organizations participating in the study include the University of Washington's Polar Science Center, Seattle, and the U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, N.H.

EDIT/END

http://bbsnews.net/article.php/200710080503217
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. I can't help but wonder...
if that "unusual pattern of atmospheric pressure" was caused by previous decreases in ice cover up there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Oddly enough, that crossed my mind as well!
The other kicker here is that this is something that cannot be attributed to solar activity, sunspots, or any of the other red herrings the denialists are constantly horching up. Since this took place during the winter, and over two winters, the solar influence on ice formation and longevity would be . . . . . ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Wait, I have it. Neutrinos!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Of COURSE! The fiendish cunning!
Who knew the Red Chinese had such technical prowess - skills that they wield even today to destroy the polar ice in order to threaten lucrative real estate investment in coastal Florida and South Carolina!!!

:tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. As long as Lomborg and Crichton give me credit in their next books.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Oh, and by the way . . .
Not that this trend is locked in place or anything like that (way too many variables), but wouldn't a loss of 23% in perennial sea ice over two years spell out minimal to no perennial sea within 10 or 15 years at the outside?

Just thought I'd ask . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. And linear predictions have consistently estimated on the optimistic side.
I can't remember the last time I saw any field researchers saying "things are better than our linear models predicted."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. I know where they can stick those linear models...
Signed,

The Chick Who Always Sat in the Back of the Room and Bitched About the Inadequacy of the Models in Hydrology :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. There's one of you in every class.
Agitators. Dissenters. Geeks Who Get The Prof Wound Up Right Before The Bell Rings, So Everybody Else Has To Stay Late. Naming Themselves After Birds. Why? Why do you hate America?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Well excuse me...
Just because YOU think YOU can come up with a model for predicting erosion based on TWO data points... :eyes:

This would never happen in Soviet Russia. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Heh. You've heard the story about the drunk and the car-keys?
The one where a Sober Guy happens across a Drunk Guy, who is looking around underneath a street-light.

SG: Hey, whatcha looking for?
DG: I'm looking for my car keys (or: "Iyam lookin fer mah carr keesssh")
SG: Funny, there's no car here. Are you sure you lost them here?
DG: Oh, no -- I lost them way over there, by my car.
SG: Well... what on earth are you looking over here for?
DG: The light's better over here!

I have a theory that any scientist goes through the Five Stages with that story:
Denial
Anger
Bargaining
Depression
Acceptance
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Well...
If you're losing a specific quantity of ice every 2 years (equal to .23X where X is what was there 2 years ago) then it would seem to follow that it would all be gone in 8 years or less (since you're starting at .77X.)

If you're losing a certain percentage (23% every 2 years) then the calculations get somewhat more difficult as it asymptotically approaches 0. Of course, the sea will be heating faster and faster as the ice melts, in turn, accelerating the melting... So... I'd say your numbers are fairly conservative.

:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Well, you know how it is . . .
I wouldn't want to go out on a limb and fearlessly predict that things will move faster than expected.

Wouldn't want to appear alarmist, now would I?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Do you really think it's going to asymptotically approach zero?
If an asymptotic approach is like a plane coming in for a gentle landing at an airport, I think this approach is going to be like that absolutely horrific NOVA show I saw a few years ago about a plane crash in South America where the plane was flying at night and the instrument that told the pilot which was was up went on the fritz. I think the crash investigation showed that the plane went into the side of the mountain at about a 45 degree angle... upside down. :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. No n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-09-07 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. I give it 5 years. But what the hell do I know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bronxiteforever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Great post.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC