Who are the largest proponents of Nuclear power? Why, the nuclear industry of course! (through lobbying groups like the
Nuclear Power Oversight Committee and the
Nuclear Energy Institute.) Nuclear power means a continuation of "business as usual," where customers pay money to utilities, for power generated at large generating facilities.
We're told that Nuclear Power is absolutely safe. Okay, if that's true, why would the industry lobby for renewal of the
Price-Anderson Act to get government protection from large-scale liability? (If it's so safe, there should be
no need for something like the Price-Anderson Act.)
The nuclear power industry (really just a subset of the power industry) pays big money to influence government policy. Sometimes,
they're caught red-handed in conflicts of interest. Much of the time they are not.
Proponents of nuclear power (notably the industry itself) dismiss alternatives, like solar and wind power. Why? in part, because they allow a revolution in power generation. When customers can generate their own power on their own roofs, then the large-scale power generators are in trouble. So, they produce misleading graphics
like this, implying that we would need to surrender entire states to power generation.
Germany is legally mandating the development of alternative energies. I say "more power to them." The only way we can get change to the status quo is to
demand it.
"Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did, and it never will."
Frederick Douglass