Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is this accurate? My editorial in my high school newspaper

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Media Donate to DU
 
stpalm Donating Member (734 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-05 07:13 PM
Original message
Is this accurate? My editorial in my high school newspaper
The Myth of the Liberal Media
==name edited===

If you have had the misfortune to have listened to today’s conservatives, you have no doubt heard the nonstop railing about the villainous liberal mainstream media (ABC, NBC, CBS, and CNN) whose sole purpose is to squelch conservative thought and brainwash the American populace into supporting immoral, evil, tax-and-spend liberal policies. Just turn on vitriolic radio ranters like Rush Limbaugh or Sean Hannity and you will no doubt hear this exact sentiment echoed- over and over. It provides the aforementioned people (who have little to say) something to talk about. These sentiments have basically become accepted as fact in the political arena. However, using the Bush Presidency as an example, we can see that the idea that the mainstream media is a tool of the Democratic Party and biased towards liberal politics is not true. In addition, we can see that there is a massive Right Wing media that manipulates the supposedly liberal mainstream media.

Think logically, now. The mainstream media is currently owned by massive corporations. Disney owns ABC. Viacom owns CBS. And perhaps most frightening, one of the largest corporations in America, Microsoft, is merged with NBC in the form of a cable channel. Massive corporations are not known for being bastions of liberalism and progressive ideas. They are interested in making money, not imposing politics. When they do work with politics, corporations are unabashedly conservative; Conservatives work harder to make sure these corporations can make more money. The mainstream media is not liberal. There is a liberal media, but it consists of various websites and small-circulation magazines, and is most certainly not the mainstream media.

The press’s goal has changed. Once, the purpose of a free press was to investigate truth and report it. Now, due to coordinated efforts dating back to the 1970s, (mostly Conservative whining that their insane ideas were not given a public forum) balance became the focus of news, rather than actually telling the public if what has been said is true. Rather than reporting what is true and what is false, the media has become lazy and not bothered to determine these things. The mainstream media now simply lets both sides present their view. This is not journalism. This provides conservatives with an unrestricted forum to present their views. So this pretty much demolishes the notion that the mainstream media wants to squelch conservative thought, because every night on the evening news you can hear what conservative politicians have to say, true or not.

Bush also has been particularly adept at manipulating the lazy and profit-oriented media. His administration releases bad news on Friday afternoons, because Saturday paper readership is the lowest. Bush’s press representatives are extremely hostile to supposedly liberal reporters. His administration also used taxpayer money to fund fake news broadcasts that were supportive of his views. They looked like real news reports, but were excessively biased. When they were sent to news stations, amazingly, some ran them on their broadcasts without question! The Administration has also been known to use taxpayer money to bribe conservative pundits and media personalities to espouse the current view of the White House. If this isn’t media manipulation, I don’t know what is. Democrats are too disorganized to pull this stuff off.

Think of what a liberal media can do. In the 70s, the liberal mainstream media brought down a president. Nowadays, the current administration does much worse than Nixon ever did and the corporate-owned media twiddles their thumbs, because they are lazy. That liberal mainstream media is dead. The new media worries about making money and how easy things are to cover. Investigative journalism is completely dead and people don’t care, because they are engrossed in pointless, non-news stories that masquerade as real news- Michael Jackson, The “runaway bride”, Scott Peterson, etc. The accusations of liberal bias consist mostly of out-of-context quotes circulated endlessly among the endless quantity of Right-Wing think tanks. They are completely bogus and the Right Wing knows it, but they continue complaining about the oppressive liberal media because they have a need to be portrayed as a heroic minority, when in fact, they control all three branches of government and are adept at manipulating the force that shifts public opinion- the media. If you want to see real liberal media, go to the school library and read through “The Nation”. Then go and watch the evening news. The difference is quite striking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-05 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. "corporate-owned media twiddles their thumbs, because they are lazy"
I disagree here. I believe that the corporate media is in partnership with the administration.

Your piece is very well written, though. Congratulations on a job well done!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-05 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Excellent article - and I agree with eleny, it's not laziness.
Also excellent to use "corporate media" rather than "mainstream media"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-05 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. Pretty accurate.
And now 24/7 CNN News prostitutes itself with hours of 'entertainment news.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-05 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wow1
High school? I'm impressed. The author is very talented.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-05 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. agreed - it is not laziness
the meadia is owned
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kaygore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-05 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. Suggestion
This is very well said; however, in the second paragraph you mention that corporations are in business to make money: "They are interested in making money, not imposing politics."

Remember that there is nothing wrong in corporations making money; however, there is something very wrong when they lobby to create laws that are good for them but bad for everyone else. They are wrong when they pay their executives obscene amounts of money and benefits and then make decisions that put the livelihoods of thousands of people at risk (GM).

In the last paragraph, when you say, "corporate-owned media twiddles their thumbs, because they are lazy," I think that you miss two points that you may want to drive home here. First, the airwaves are public property. We the citizens permit the media to use the air waves and making money in exchange for their also serving the public interest, i.e. putting money into their news groups so that there can be sound investigative reporting and not just taking the news from the AP wires.

Second also relates to the public interest point but directly addresses "lazy." Corporate media eschews its debt to the public to provide unbiased and informative (as opposed to run away bride type) news in favor of ratings. News is a public service. It should NOT be a profit center. It should be free to be a gadfly and it should have the money necessary to follow the story.

You may want to listen (I'm sorry but the speech has not been transcribed yet) to the speech that Bill Moyers just made today at the Conference on Media Reform. It is not a short speech but it is WELL worth listening to and is very germane to your topic here:

http://www.freepress.net/conference/audio05/moyers.mp3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tech3149 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-05 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I think from the tone
He's already listened to his speech. If not he's watched NOW more than once or twice.

BTW good suggestion about the corporate references
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tech3149 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-15-05 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. I think this need wider distribution than a high scool paper
Edited on Sun May-15-05 08:59 PM by tech3149
If it gets published, why not let us know about it? Then we can present it as an example of how todays youth understands how the M$M doesn't serve the public interest. The fact that it's published and verifiable will only add to the impact. Send it to a local paper as an editorial.

You do good work young citizen!

edit: I agree with the comments about corporations, that would be a good suggestion to follow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-05 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Agree!!!! Nominated for "greatest" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocottelle Donating Member (62 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-05 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
9. Very well done
You are very talented. I am impressed. Keep it up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stpalm Donating Member (734 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-05 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
11. thanks to everyone!
I already submitted the article, but thanks for the tips anyway. If there are logical errors, which there seem to be, it's because I was just pissed while writing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oxbow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-05 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
12. Hope it gets printed!
The future is looking bright for young people. Where is your High school anyway?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-05 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
13. Good job, my young friend!
We are counting on folks such as yourself as us old people slowdown (or die at work if the republiCONs have their way)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-05 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
14. The MJ's and the OJ's are easy to produce.. and cheap
They love an OJ trial. No travel expenses, no hotel bills, no expense accounts. All they need is a few volunteer talking heads and a camera .

I believe a for profit media is a corrupted media. They will always be biased towards the gravy train. And in todays world the corporate owned media has a bed buddy with the corrupt republicans. Just look at how media pushed the war. There was one anti war commentator and they fired him. Phil Donahue was the highest rated show on MSNBC and they fired him because they thought he was bad for business.

I guess war can be profitable to GE (Owns NBC)which is a huge industrial military corporation which makes money on military wars. Hence the firing of Donahue. He was bad for business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Media Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC