Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Van Halen "Brown M&M" story is actually explained - Colbert (6:06)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 08:40 PM
Original message
The Van Halen "Brown M&M" story is actually explained - Colbert (6:06)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. it's a good point, and lots of bands do similar things -- but have you ever read Iggy Pop's rider?
Some pretty funny stuff in those 18 pages:

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/file/lust-laughs

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. That story is to determine if some group is completly compliant.
Edited on Fri Jan-07-11 11:40 PM by RandomThoughts
If someone will do something that has no meaning, or no purpose, then they 'in theory' will be able to do things without thinking or feeling about it.

If someone asks you to do something that you think has no reason, and you will do it, then you are more likely to do something that you think is wrong.

it is determining followship and if someone will follow without thought, if they are a non thinker, non feeler, that person can be used for any purpose.

It is a check to see if someone can become your tool, or if they will think and feel.



I think the thing that told Abraham to kill his child, and the thing that told him not to, were different things. One was the bad side trying to get him to continue blind followship in a way to create much grief and suffering, the other trying to explain to him that it was not needed nor the thing to do. Although I know most of the telling of that story is about blind followship.

Not sure if they ever mentioned the actual voice that told him not to hurt his children, but I think it was Michael. But that is just my guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-08-11 02:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. old news. Has been know at least since the 1984 album.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC