Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clear Channel: Stern too racy, Spears racy but wholesome?????

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 08:28 AM
Original message
Clear Channel: Stern too racy, Spears racy but wholesome?????
http://www.imdb.com/PeopleNews/#6

Britney Spears' Onyx Hotel tour has kicked off to a bad start, she has been accused of making "desperate attempts to shock". Spears began her North American tour in San Diego, California, on March 2, and when it hit Los Angeles on Monday, it failed to impress Los Angeles Daily News critic Fred Shuster. He writes, "Spears was wheeled on stage in a tall chariot, looking for all the world like a statue of Lenin, if the Russian dictator had been a beefy bottle-blond aerobics instructor. The robotic pelvic thrusts began almost immediately. Much has been made of the show's allegedly racy content. But as a second male dancer's head was being pulled into Spears' crotch Monday, the night's sole irony became enticingly clear - the tour is promoted by Clear Channel, the radio broadcasting giant that recently dropped Howard Stern from six of its stations and has taken a self-congratulatory stand against what it called public decency. More troubling is Spears' continued inability to realize how dull she is when she's not acting as glorified ringmaster. As she sat down at the piano to simulate a ballad 'that's close to my heart' she announced that after all she'd suffered at the hands of the press, 'At the end of the day, it's made me what I am today.' A frat boy in the back row had a rejoinder: 'Whatever.' Toxic might be the best way to describe Spears' Onyx Hotel roadshow."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GOPisEvil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. Wow...Clear Channel hypocritical? Say it isn't so!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Here's her review from the LA Daily News
http://u.dailynews.com/Stories/0,1413,211~23540~2006506,00.html

In another desperate attempt to shock, writhing couples in beds held center stage while silhouettes of rutting performers played on screens above. For titillation, the valet parking attendants outside had sexier moves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPisEvil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Here's what is REALLY obscene!
As ticket holders entered the arena, vendors stationed every few feet hawked outrageously priced items: programs $25, binocular rentals $25, Spears yoga pants $60, T-shirts $35, posters $10.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScreamingMeemie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Yoga pants??? God, things have changed. It used to be a $10
black Tshirt with the bands' latest album cover on it and tour dates on the back. Now we have yoga pants? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPisEvil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 08:43 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. My birthday's in June.
Please HESITATE to buy those for me. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SCDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. Britney seems to have become a real skank
I mean she started out all wholesome and everything and now.... too much make up or too much skin or something... you can barely recognize her anymore. Not that I ever listened to her songs but you see on commercials or MTV or whatever and there is just a total difference and not for the better in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. Stern was public access.
You have to buy tickets, or subscribe to cable to see Britney. One would hope, vainly prehaps, that if she pulled a buys face into her crotch on public TV she'd get fined too. Not to mention sued for endangering the life of the poor man. Who knows what he'd catch down there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. True - but the irony here is Clear Channel is her sponser
Seriously - think about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. Respectfully disagree.
It would only be ironic if they were sponsering live human hunts, or something similar, on public access media but cracking on Stern for being offensive.

The two venues are completely seperate and do not fall under the same set of rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Limbought Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
7. The Sweet Little Girl Next Door



NOT!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LagaLover Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. But DAMN
she is HOT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colin Ex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #11
31. What are you talking about, dude?
I've seen blocks of wax that are sexier than that.

-C
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LagaLover Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. Your opinion...
Many find her very sexy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DenverDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
10. Obvious point, Stern is Anti-bushler, Brit is a GOP whore.
"Obscene" is measured by political leaning, not salacious behavior.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LagaLover Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Wow!
I just love when men call sexually provocative women "whores" with absolutely nothing to back up that contention. Do you pay for it often?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DenverDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Britanny supports the pretzeldent publicly.
I call all who support an unelected fraud "whores", especially the press. I don't find Britanny Spears sexually provacative, rather sexually repulsive.

Peddle your pseduofeminist misdirection elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LagaLover Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. A whore is one who sells
sex for money and the word "whore" as a derogatory term. I don't appreciate a young woman being called a whore, just because you don't like her politics. BTW, it's spelled Britney. Seems since you know so much about her, you ought to at least know how to spell her name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Rush Limbaugh and Tucker Carlson are WHORES
And I can list a long name of men that I also consider a whore. Denver said it best, Britney isn't a whore because she dresses in an 'interesting' manner. She's a whore because she sucks up to Bush. Obviously because Clear Channel got rid of Stern, a recent and very vocal opponent against Bush, but sponsering Britney Spears tour shows that Clear Channel is probably the biggest whore out there!

BTW - Big time feminist too!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LagaLover Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. So one who supports a particular
political person or party is a "whore" based on another's perception of that particular political person or party? Does that make Michael Moore a whore? What about Al Franken?

My point: I'm sick of name-calling. Why do we have to label people in such a manner? Why do we have to a 21 year-old woman, who probably doesn't have any strong political beliefs, because she doesn't know any better, a vile name like "whore." When did we become so uncivil?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DenverDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. America became uncivil when Newt Gengrich got into congress.
We are in an uncivil war for this country's future and civility will only get our asses kicked. What's obscene is what's going on in the white house and house of congress.

Britttteny knows exactly what she is doing by supporting her overlords' overlord and she is most certainly selling sex for super big bucks and by any definition of the word she is a WHORE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LagaLover Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. No, she is not;
and therein lies part of the problem. The incivility, the purposeful misuse of words to defame and defile, it's dividing us all. BOTH sides do it; but I NEVER thought I'd see liberals, the people I count on for acceptance and tolerance, stoop to the levels of the divisive bomb throwers from the far right.

It's WRONG to call a 21 year old woman a whore unless she engages in sexual activity for money. To do otherwise is to purposely misuse words to defame. Aren't we more tolerant than that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DenverDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. Enjoy your civility in the civilian internment camps.
Your guards will appreciate your temerity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LagaLover Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. And that has what to do
with calling Britney a whore? Talk about a non sequitor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DenverDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. That's where civility will get you in the 21st century.
Britttttttteny dresses like a whore, sells her product through acting like a whore on stage and in videos and whores out her politics to the men paying her millions. If it quacks like a duck.

This woman is a reprehensible role model and unworthy of defense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LagaLover Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. LMAO
Frustrated are we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DenverDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. Wooooooo, good rejoinder.
Actually, I'm only frustrated by the preponderance of stupidity in Amerikan culture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LagaLover Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 10:12 AM
Response to Reply #29
32. It's stupid
for people to like Britney Spears? Oh, I see. I didn't realize you were the arbitor of what is stupid and what is "smart" with respect to American culture. Please post a list so we all know what meets the new Culture Czar's approval.

Personal, I don't like Britney's music much, but some of it is passable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thebigidea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #32
35. some of it is passable? I didn't realize YOU were the arbiter of culture
Why is your opinion weightier?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LagaLover Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. Not at all
passable WRT MY taste, no one else's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thebigidea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #36
38. so why shriek at an opposing opinion like that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chenGOD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #19
39. if you don't think Britney Spears is selling sexual activity,
what do you think strippers are doing? Dancing?

It's pretty obvious that Britney Spears is trying to make money by arousing the "prurient interest" of young men everywhere. It sure ain't the talent that's selling records.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LagaLover Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #39
40. She's selling sexual activity?
And how many of her fans is she having intercourse with? engaging in oral sex with? performing digital gratification on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chenGOD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #40
41. Do you think:
a: stripping is a form of sexual activity?
b: cybersex is a form of sexual activity?
c: masturbation is a form of sexual activity?


if you answer yes to any of them, then Britney Spears is certainly selling sexual activity.

I am not a prude, and personally I don't care if someone decides they want to be the star of gangbang girls 37. But to say that Britney is not using sexuality to sell records (ie make money) is just flat-out living in denial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LagaLover Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #41
42. In response to your questions
1. No
2. Only if one is masturbating during it.
3. Yes

And Britney is not masturbating anyone nor engaging in cybersex with anyone. She is definitely using sex to sell records, but she is not engaging in sexual activity for money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DenverDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #42
43. In her latest vid, she plays an airline flight attendant,
spills wine in an old businessman's crotch, rubs it "dry" while the businessman appears to have an orgasm.

Splain that one away.

BTW, say hello to the other drones in the Scaifeco boiler room.

Enough intellectual energy wasted on this bs red herring silliness.

Britttttttttteny is uquestionably a WHORE no matter how you define it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LagaLover Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #43
44. Video
Real Life....Video...Real Life...See the difference?

Another frustrated middle-aged man calling a woman he can never have a whore. I love it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DenverDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #44
45. Still pushing the "frustration" meme?
Edited on Thu Mar-11-04 11:40 AM by DenverDem
Given the existance of my beautiful wife this is an absurd theory. I wouldn't trade her for a thousand slutty fat assed whores like Britttttttttttteny.


Reality.....Denial.
Reality.....Denial.
See the difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LagaLover Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #45
46. Wow!
Now she's a slut as well as a whore. Sounds like you have issues with women overtly expressing their sexuality. Nest you'll be saying "She deserved it! Look how that harlot dresses and dances. She's just a temptress!"

Get off the meme, meme. You come across as a man unable to cope with a young woman's overt sexuality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DenverDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. Christina Aguillera, now that's overt sexuality I can support.
And she can sing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LagaLover Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. No argument there N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. I don't see them as that but I'm sure Free Republic calls them that
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LagaLover Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. I'll bet they do
And those guys are definitely not whores! That's why I don't like the whole name-calling bit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thebigidea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. lets refrain from namecalling and call our opponents heroes
Edited on Thu Mar-11-04 09:51 AM by thebigidea
Dick Cheney is a good man, he is the front line in our ongoing battle against tooth decay.

Do you have any other requests? Might as well, now that you're in a lecturing mood. Bulleted points would be nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LagaLover Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. Where did I say we should praise our
opponents? And since when is Britney Spears my opponent?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thebigidea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. well, the conversation went on to whores in the political sense
which is the sense in which that poster invoked the term, despite your efforts to paint it otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LagaLover Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. And even so
We should call our political "opponents" names?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thebigidea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #30
34. no, we should treat 2004 like tea with the Queen.
Edited on Thu Mar-11-04 10:15 AM by thebigidea
Our only solution is to behave like Joe Lieberman - that's the path to victory.

JOEMENTUM FOREVER!

If you can't say something nice about the Republican Party - why, don't say anything at all.

So would you consider Kerry's "crooks and liars" comment beyond the pale as well?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LagaLover Donating Member (500 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-04 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #34
37. No,
I would not. I have no doubt that Kerry has facts with which he can use to support his use of those terms.

Nothing wrong with facts. I, and it is personal with me, don't agree with name-calling for the sake of name-calling. Calling a crook, a crook, is valid. Calling a liar, a liar, is valid. Calling Britney Spears a whore is not. IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC