I saw it at the flicks ages ago.
I thought it was WAY unbelievable the way the young adult Tomme took drugs and/or put himself into a trance and remembered where his family lived and climbed up story after story to their apartment.
I wonder how strictly it adhered to the truth, if it was based on truth at all. I don't believe there are any legal restrictions on movie makers about that.
FARGO burned me with that. It says at the beginning that the movie is based on events that happened in MN, which is crap.
From WIKIPEDIA:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fargo_(film)#Fact_vs._fiction
Fargo opens with the following text:
“ THIS IS A TRUE STORY. The events depicted in this film took place in Minnesota in 1987. At the request of the survivors, the names have been changed. Out of respect for the dead, the rest has been told exactly as it occurred. ”
Although the film itself is completely fictional, the Coen brothers claim that many of the events that take place in the movie were actually based on true events from other cases that they threw together to make one story. Joel Coen said, "We weren't interested in that kind of fidelity. The basic events are the same as in the real case, but the characterizations are fully imagined." He later noted,
"If an audience believes that something's based on a real event, it gives you permission to do things they might otherwise not accept."The Coens claim the actual murders took place, but not in Minnesota.<2> The main reason for the film's Minnesota setting was based on the fact that the Coens were born and raised in St. Louis Park, a suburb of Minneapolis.<3>