Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
SofaKingLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 03:02 AM
Original message
.
Edited on Sat Mar-18-06 03:14 AM by SofaKingLiberal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Random_Australian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 04:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well, yes, in one sense,
but how can you make such an assertion without assuming a priori and unwarranted existential premise?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 04:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. 'Hegel is arguing
that the reality is merely an a priori adjunct of non-naturalistic ethics, Kant via the categorical imperative is holding that ontologically it exists only in the imagination, and Marx is claiming it was offside."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Random_Australian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 04:25 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Hah! Reality is inherit in the sub-evolutionistic attempt of
man to advance himself through cognitive understanding of his environment, ie. it is inherit it the situational non-subjective reality, Kant is a fool as categorical imperative can only exist when it is inherit in the defintion and thus only exists in a subjectice reality anyway, and hey wow you weren't bieng serious I only just realised that lol! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 04:30 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. LOL!
G'day, Bruce. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Random_Australian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 04:58 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Hmmmm, explain the "g'day Bruce" bit would ya? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 05:00 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Oh, sorry, mate
Thought you caught the Monty Python reference the first time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Random_Australian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 05:03 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. *sigh* I got the Monty Python bit, but I know not
which Bruce to whom you refer! Concordantly, your head will be nailed to the table.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 05:08 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. I was referring to the Bruce
who teaches Hegelian philosophy and is also in charge of the sheep dip.

But couldn't you instead just screw my pelvis to a cake stand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Random_Australian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 05:14 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. I've not seen much of the flying circus, and most of that a long time ago
hey, scroll down for a suprise...






























The Spanish Inquisition!

Bet you didn't expect that!

Now let's trade quotes(I've not seen Python for do long mine won't be spot on)... or I shall be forced to shoot you right between the eyes! Well, actually, it's not like I have to hit a point bisecting a line drawn between your pupils, but well, you get the drift.

P.S. That's never a willow...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 05:22 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. You're right
I didn't expect that.

O' course, I'm all cosy here in my comfy chair, munching on albatross.

Later, I'm gonna have lobster thermidor au crevettes in a mornay sauce in a provençale manner garnished with truffle paté, brandy with a fried egg on top and Spam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Random_Australian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 05:27 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. hahaha! nice one oed!
Guess this one then, smarty :) ...

Voice 1: HALT!
Narrator: Yes! It was the dreaded three-headed knight! The most dangerous creature for yards around... for second after second, Robin held his own, but then suddenly, dramatically, he changed his tactics...
Voice 1: He's Buggered Off!
Voice 1-2: So 'e has, he's scarpered!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 05:30 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. '...bravely ran away, away'
"I didn't!"

"When danger reared its ugly head, he bravely turned his tail and fled..."

"Oh, liar!"

(Et cetera.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Random_Australian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 05:34 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Yeh true but my point was that it was not in the movie... I think...
btw, "What kind of world is this in which a shrubbery dealer..."
"Some call me....... Tim"

Nah I'm gonna get whopped. perhaps I should run away further, and confuse you... or perhaps taunt you, you may become so angry you may make a mistake... like what?

(Yes I know I left out "oh shut up. .... ... and go change your armour!")
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 05:38 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. 'You know much that is hidden, o Tim'
("What an eccentric performance.")

Trivia: Bea Duffel, the woman who played the old crone to whom Arthur and Bedevere said "Ni," also played the woman in "Fahrenheit 411" who set fire to her books, her house and herself rather than let the Firemen do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Random_Australian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 06:09 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. Trivia: Milord Blackadder did most definately NOT
eat this delicious, plump-breasted pigeon...

(He didn't, you only see him going ahhh, delicious and wiping his lips with a plate of bones in fromt of him... apply fundy logic, and he never even saw it...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dangerously Amused Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 05:48 AM
Response to Reply #13
21. Heh heh.





You said "screw my pelvis."




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 04:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yvr girl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 04:15 AM
Response to Original message
3. I completely disagree
completely
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Random_Australian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 04:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Oh yeah? do you even know what we're talking about? NO!
So you can take that disagreement and use it as the principal alotment for a nemisistic post-narcoleptic modernist dynamic capital investment! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yvr girl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 04:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I would, but it's late
Maybe tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 04:21 AM
Response to Original message
7. Are you sure?
I mean, yeah, but...really?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Random_Australian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 05:20 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. Certainty obtained in what context of what reality? Elaborate please...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Random_Australian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. Because when you think about it certainty in a subjective
reality is meaningless, (due to the subjectivity of the observation), an given that definitions are part of that subject reality, albeit inherit in the order from a non-subjective reality that demands these cognitive processess as a function of survival, and that categorical imperative is inherit only in defintion, you cannot have certainty in a non-subjective world... so what do you mean?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Mexico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
24. I'd thank you not to post such scandalous accusations without proof. :))))
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Random_Australian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Scandalous? dude wtf all it was was an intellectual proposition,
and as for proof! PROOF! See that #23, my dear friend. Proof IS just a valid/invalid cognitive process to provide certainty in subjective reality!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Mexico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-19-06 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. Yes, but you clearly imply, intentionally or not, that the period is
more worthy of attention than the comma, exclamation point or question mark. Do you deny this? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastic cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-18-06 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
25. :
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC