Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Alexander Payne's "ELECTION"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Fenris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 10:14 PM
Original message
Alexander Payne's "ELECTION"


http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0126886/

Okay, I've been thinking a lot lately about this movie. Like all of Alexander Payne's movies, Election is somewhat unsettling. Tracey is clearly a ruthless overachiever who is willing to crush all of those before her to get ahead in life. She is willing to do what she feels is necessary, and it won't take the audience that long to really, really hate her.

But at the same time, Mr. McAllister is also a low-life. By the time the movie ends, it is likely that the audience will feel just as repulsed as they do toward Tracey. Watching him "prep" for his affair in that seedy motel room is almost painful to watch.

So we want Paul to defeat Tracey in the election, and yet we don't. If she wins, it satisfies her need for acceptance and victory. If Paul wins, it will mostly be to the benefit of McAllister.

So what we're left at is that Tracey is a horrible human being, but so is McAllister. And even though she may be deserving of misfortune, she is just a kid.

Damn I'm over-thinking this.:dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
democracyindanger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. But she's a kid
with a highly advanced sense of manipulation and evil. Like an 18-year-old Karl Rove. Whereas McAllister didn't start out as a lowlife, but became one in order to defeat her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fenris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yeah, I guess that's sort of the point.
Obsession with winning corrupts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marshall McClueless Donating Member (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think the scary thing is Tracey's future potential.
That's what terrified me, anyway.

Mind you, it's not as utterly, soul-crushingly depressing as 'Happiness'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fenris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. 'Happiness' is like being beaten with a baseball bat.
"If only I had been abused as a child! *Then* I would know authenticity!"

Great movie, but not something you watch often.

'Storytelling' at least had the advantage of a great soundtrack.;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marshall McClueless Donating Member (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yeah.
And it's slightly, just slightly, less misanthropic. What has Solondz been up to recently? I've lost track.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fenris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. His last movie was a strange one about abortion called 'Palindromes'
He's getting less and less misanthropic but no less controversial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marshall McClueless Donating Member (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Ah.
Edited on Thu Nov-03-05 10:34 PM by Marshall McClueless
Nothing says 'cheery comedy' like a Todd Solondz movie about abortions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fenris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Not light viewing.
'Citizen Ruh' is a much easier film on the subject.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marshall McClueless Donating Member (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Yeah - I'd heard that.
There's an interesting sub-thread - what's the earliest movie to specifically deal with abortions? I seem to remember it being an issue in the original Alfie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingyouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. The earliest film might be "Flaming Youth," actually.
It was released in 1923. However, while the book mentions a character terminating a pregnancy, I don't know if the movie actually goes that far. And actually, no one does since all but about three minutes of the film is lost to time, sadly.

Other silent films tiptoed around the topic. There's an interesting book on pre-Hays code Hollywood that lists several of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marshall McClueless Donating Member (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Yeah, pre-Hays, there was quite a lot of surprisingly risque stuff.
I imagine there's some dreary mid-fifties Brit films that deal with the issue, but I don't know if they would be explicit about the subject.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fenris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Julien Duvivier's 'Un carnet de bal' broached the subject in 1937
It's French, so it may not count. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marshall McClueless Donating Member (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Maybe there's some German Expressionist cinema on the subject
- after all, if Fritz Lang could make 'M', there clearly weren't many taboos in old Weimar-land.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fenris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Which is probably why the republic was so short lived.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marshall McClueless Donating Member (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Yeah - that sort of thing would tend to create a backlash.
Sadly, that was one hell of a backlash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingyouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. It's good to see you back.
You have been missed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marshall McClueless Donating Member (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Thanks.
I missed me too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingyouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. We all have our own Tracys to bear.
God knows I do. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fenris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. SNAP!
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingyouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Does Sandy ring a bell?
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fenris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. NO SMOKING AT STIKTEK!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingyouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Sorry, no sense of humor either.
Rules is rules!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asthmaticeog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-03-05 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
23. I'm trying to think of a single sympathetic character in that film.
And I've got nothing, save for the Tammy subplot.

Which I rather enjoy - one can really sink one's teeth into a film's situations and moral dilemmas when nobody's wearing white and black hats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomKoolzip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
24. That movie left me feeling as sad and doomy as any I've ever watched.
And ultimately, I think it was kind of cheap and manipulative for Payne to put an audience through that. What were his intentions? Were we supposed to laugh? Get angry? Feel pity? All of the above?

I just think it's too easy to make a movie with ZERO sympathetic characters, ZERO character development, and ZERO lessons learned. I mean, I could make a film of myself witlessly insulting strangers all day, but asking others to wtch it would be presumptuous.

Payne's refusal of any redemptive factors really got to me. I have no desire to ever see that movie again.

PS, I didn't like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
henslee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
25. "Dear God, thank you for all your blessings. You've given me so many
many things, like good health, nice parents, a nice truck, and what I'm told is a large penis and I'm very grateful."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Susang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
26. The beauty of the film is in it's character's complexities
All the adults, especially Mr. McAllister are seriously flawed. For once, Paul, the jock character, is sensitive (but still dumb). Tracy has what normally would be considered admirable qualities, but her drive and lack of a moral center is truly frightening.

Election was constructed like a parable. All of the characters, while flawed, have likable qualities at the beginning of the film. By the end of the film, they've pretty much turned into parodies of their earlier selves. Tracy appears malevolent and evil, McAllister seems pathetic and bumbling, all are hysterically funny and terribly sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
henslee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. Kudos to Tom Perrota the novelist. Funny how Payne seems to
get all the credit for his stories when they are largely adapted.... Not to diminish his greatness. Plus to his credit, he is always plugging the novelists he adapts from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loonman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
28. That movie is brilliant
Edited on Fri Nov-04-05 08:48 AM by Loonman
Shows how low people will go if allowed. Not your typical Hollywood bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC