Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Supreme Court Strikes Down Ban on Wine Shipments

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-05 11:51 AM
Original message
Supreme Court Strikes Down Ban on Wine Shipments
Let the Party Begin!

:woohoo: :party: :woohoo:



Supreme Court Strikes Down Ban on Wine Shipments

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published: May 16, 2005

Filed at 12:20 p.m. ET

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Wine lovers may buy directly from out-of-state vineyards, the Supreme Court ruled Monday, striking down laws banning a practice that has flourished because of the Internet and growing popularity of winery tours.

The 5-4 decision overturns laws in New York and Michigan, which supporters said were aimed at protecting local wineries and limiting underage drinkers from purchasing wine without showing proof of age. In all, 24 states have laws barring interstate shipments.

(snip)

The ruling means that legislatures in the 24 states barring out-of-state shipments will have to review their laws to make sure in-state and out-of-state wineries are treated equally. As a result, states could choose to allow wineries to sell to consumers directly, but could also bar all wineries from doing so.

(snip)

The Washington-based Institute for Justice says the 24 states that ban direct shipments from out-of-state wineries are Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, Montana, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, New York, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah and Vermont.

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/national/AP-Scotus-Wine-Shipments.html?hp&ex=1116302400&en=f9ac60875598b512&ei=5094&partner=homepage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-05 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. And Kenneth Starr
begins to slightly redeem himself...

20 bucks says that the Feds step in. anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Total Disaster Donating Member (61 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-05 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Finally!
How silly (and ridiculous) it has been to have to hand-carry a case or two of wine on the plane simply because you can't ship it back to your hometown.

I don't see how this probibiting the shipment of wine was hurtful to anyone other than those who wished to do business with one another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-05 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is good for me
but probably bad for local wine merchants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smitty Donating Member (580 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-05 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. wine shipments
The state bans were not about protecting local vineyards or stopping underage drinking---it was about taxes. By buying wine over the Internet, people avoided state liquor taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-16-05 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. It was also about in-state distributors wanting no competition
It wasn't just about taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC