Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CHEMICALS: Lowest Score Wins

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Elidor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 12:47 AM
Original message
CHEMICALS: Lowest Score Wins
The number of hair products in your shower, multiplied by

The number of working phones in your household, whether currently plugged in or not, plus

The number of chemical containers under your kitchen sink, multiplied by

The number of computers in your house.

So for instance, I have:
11 shampoo/conditioner, times…
4 working phones, plus…
11 nasty chemicals under the kitchen sink, times…
1 computer

Equals 55

Can you beat it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. 0
Edited on Tue Feb-15-05 12:50 AM by Rabrrrrrr
1 hair product, 1 phone, 0 chemical containers, and 4 computers.

(now, technically, everything is a chemical, but I use only "green" cleaning stuff, so I'm not including it as a nasty chemical, of which I have none, except a small amount of bleach in the laundry room which I use only rarely to kill mold and remove stains - I've gone through, I'd say, a pint of bleach in the last ten years)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kenneth ken Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. that would be a 1 not 0
1 x 1 = 1
0 x 4 = 0
1 + 0 = 1

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Oops, you're right! I thought it was all multiplication!
I misread.

1 it is!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mark414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. um...5
Edited on Tue Feb-15-05 12:49 AM by mark414
1 hair stuff
1 phone
5 chemicals
1 computer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kenneth ken Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. um...6 actually
1 x 1 = 1
5 x 1 = 5
1 + 5 = 6
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mark414 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #6
28. ohhh it was plus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Not_Giving_Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 12:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. Let's see
2 shampoo/conditioner, times
1 working phone, plus
7 cleaners under the sink
2 computers

Nope...just 11!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kenneth ken Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. try 16
2 x 1 = 2
7 x 2 = 14
2 + 14 = 16
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elidor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #8
18. No, it's 18
2 x 1 = 2
2 + 7 = 9
9 x 2 = 18

It's

times
plus
times
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kenneth ken Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #18
27. I will have to defer to you
since you asked the question. However, I will argue that the question was phrased badly. :D

In your case

11 x 4 = 44
11 x 1 = 11
44 + 11 = 55

or

11 x 4 = 44
44 + 11 = 55
55 x 1 = 55

so you should have been more clear on the groupings :D

but I'm only playing here anyway, so I don't mind being wrong.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 12:52 AM
Response to Original message
4. Do we have to count nonworking computers?
2 Hair care products
x
2 phones
x
1 substance under the sink
x
3 working computers
__
12
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kenneth ken Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. nope 7 for you
2 x 2 = 4
1 x 3 = 3
4 + 3 = 7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elidor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. Man, I'm doing really bad here.
I can only plead my SO's hair care products. At my apartment I'd have about a 5.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elidor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #4
20. 2 x 2 = 4, 4 + 1 = 5, 5 x 3 = 15
Edited on Tue Feb-15-05 01:06 AM by Hardhead
Az has a 15.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MAlibdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
9. 8
2+2+0=8 ...dorm room, easy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diatribal Donating Member (30 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
10. How fun!
Edited on Tue Feb-15-05 12:57 AM by diatribal
2 hair products
x
3 phones
+
8 chemicals
x
2 computers

= 28

!!

Sorry. I'm very clean :) And I counted my cell phone too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kenneth ken Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. or 22
2 x 3 = 6
8 x 2 = 16
6 + 16 = 22 for you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kenneth ken Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
13. too many chemicals obviously
they've made all the respondents math-challenged :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diatribal Donating Member (30 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Hey!
I got it the second time around!

I even fixed it right.

I think.

Lemme go check.

I swear I'm not a total idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. No, yours would be 22
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elidor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #17
26. No, he's right, it's 28
This is too funny. All of us are falling apart under basic math. You guys have me doubting my own judgement now. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. Well, you see, you should have put in parentheses
Since you didn't, the way that you put it out:

A * B + C * D

that doesn't get done sequentially - multiplication and division always take precedence over addition and subtraction. So, the way you did it, you actually wrote it thus:

(A * B) + (C * D)

When, apparently, what you meant was:

((A * B) + C) * D

And since your initial figure of 55, given your starting data, works out with either equation, we had no way of knowing that you meant the second one.

But yes, absolutely, the way that you wrote it out would be taken by anyone who has studied math to mean AB + CD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kenneth ken Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #29
33. YAY! vindication
thanks for laying that out so nice and tidy.

:bounce: :bounce:

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elidor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #13
25. You're multiplying everything
:D
There's a plus symbol in there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
14. LOL! Not a single person has done the math correctly yet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SW FL Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #14
22. Order of Operations n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DIKB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #14
24. okay
9 minutes after you posted this, but is the math right at least ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SW FL Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
19. OK
hair products in shower 2 (one hubby's,one mine)
times the 6 phones in the house

Plus the chemicals under the sink (4) times the # of computers (1)

I get 12 + 4=16.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
21. 66.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DIKB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 01:06 AM
Response to Original message
23. Ouch
Edited on Tue Feb-15-05 01:08 AM by DIKB
I failed miserably.

(13 hair products x 4 phones) + (2 chemical containers x 4 computers) = 60
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Elidor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #23
30. Ummmm…I'm afraid it's worse than that
I didn't put parentheses in the equation.

13 x 4 = 52
52 + 2 = 54
54 x 4 = 216

:yourock:
Someone with a higher score! YES!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SW FL Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. No parentheses are needed. The rule of Order of Operations still applies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SW FL Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #32
35. Order of Operations PEM DAS
Parentheses, Exponents, Multiplication, Division, Addition then Subtraction - always in that order.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DIKB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #30
34. but I thought . . .
Well if you're gonna lose, may as well do it grandly :)

Now let's see someone else try and be the biggest loser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diatribal Donating Member (30 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #23
31. Math is hard
:(

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kenneth ken Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 01:32 AM
Response to Original message
36. I guess I will score myself
2 hair care products
x
2 working phones
+
3 cemical containers
x
2 computers

my math says that = 10
Hardhead says it should = 14

:hi:

what do I win as parting gifts? :D

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pansypoo53219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
37. do rotaries count?
or shampoo in the cupboard but not the shower?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrWeird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
38. Jesus Christ, people.
You're giving me contact embarassment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laundry_queen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-05 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
39. Okay. I can beat that. But in the wrong direction. LOL.
4 hair products (2 shampoos, 2 conditioners - I like to switch every couple days.)
3 working phones.
13 nasty chemicals (2 kinds of dishwasher det, jet dry, oven cleaner, stovetop cleaner, bleach, vim, all purpose cleaner, liquid dish soap, Goo gone, Mr clean magic eraser, SOS pads, comet)
3 working computers (mine, dh's laptop, dh's work computer)

So 4x3=12
12+13=25
25x3=75

yikes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC