|
I have spent the last year trying to think about who would be the best Democratic nominee for president, both politically speaking and for my personal beliefs.
In thinking of these questions I consider several factors. The first and most important one is what I personally feel about the candidate, his beliefs, his policies, his platform, his leadership and so on. But I also consider how capable I believe the candidate is of getting the Democratic nomination, and I consider how capable I believe the candidate is of beating the Republican nominee.
I liked Dennis Kucinich for his progressive platform, which I agree with. However I never really felt completely happy with him, because I didn't particularly feel that he was my personal choice for a strong leader. So it felt like I had a bunch of ideals I believed in wrapped up and up into a man that I didn't believe was capable of effectively wielding them in office. In addition to this, I do not believe he can receive the Democratic nomination, and if he did I do not believe he could beat the Republican nominee.
I paid a lot of attention to Howard Dean at first. But despite so much fanatical support for him on these boards, I've never felt comfortable about him. For one thing, I really didn't appreciate his early campaign, running as a "real liberal" with slogans like "its time for liberals to start feeling good about being Democrats" when in reality is he an extremely centrist fellow. For another thing, I knew that I did not at all like some of the things Dean had done as governor, like how he chose to balance the budget by severely cutting state social programs. But in addition to these things, I really struggled, because I just didn't care for the man. I feel that Deans hothead and un-folksy attitude is a complete turn off. I don't personally like the way he chooses to express his message, and I think he has already demonstrated his propensity towards silly hotheaded mistakes.
In other words, I do have some concrete political reasons for not liking Dean - but I also simply do not like the guy. He doesn't make me feel good about supporting my choice for President. In terms of my other consideration, I do believe Dean could get the democratic nomination, though I don't think it is a shoe-in. But I do not believe Dean could beat the republican nominee, and the fact that he and all his followers are so absolutely certain he could only reinforces my belief.
When Wesley Clark came on the scene, I instantly liked the guy. He immediately seemed like the perfect foil to Bush. He had an attitude and demeanor about him that was strong and resolute, but not disenfrancishinly angry and bitter. He chose to focus on positive idealism, like restoring a spirit of true public dialogue and embracing a "new patriotism" - he presented himself as a man who might have said with Kennedy, "some men see things as they are and ask why - I dream things that never were and ask, why not?" His idealistic language, and choice to focus on a positive message was very appealing to me.
While Clark is of course a moderate, this progressive must confess that I feel extremely comfortable with the bulk of Clark's articulated positions, and his Ten points about the use of force, which are really about foreign policy in general left me with that warm wonderful feeling in my heart. I genuinely like Clark, and I much prefer a brilliant candidate who channels his gifts into being idealistic, speaking in hopeful, even romanticized ways about what the future could and should be like, rather than a candidate who channels his gifts into angry rants and lots of name calling. Clark more than any other candidate talks about the desire to restore a spirit of dialogue in America, to rebuild the structure of patriotic disagreement, open discussion, and honest consideration of different points of view. That is one thing that is very close to my own heart, and I love his campaign language on this.
In addition to liking everything I read from Clark so far, every time I see the guy, there is something about him that connects with me. The same way I felt about Al Gore is the same way I feel about Wesley Clark. Gore had that kind of idealism that inspired me, and it came through in his speeches. Clark makes me feel the same way.
I believe General Wesley Clark is an outstanding candidate for president, and I believe he is the best and most viable candidate for president of all the nominees based on the considerations I mentioned above. I want to have a president that I can really truly believe in and support whole-heartedly, not just because he is "better than Bush." And this why this progressive supports the moderate General Wesley Clark for President.
My name is Selwynn Goodspeed, and I approve this message.
|