Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Wounded soldiers will no longer pay $8.10 a day for hospital food

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
soup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-03 07:26 AM
Original message
Wounded soldiers will no longer pay $8.10 a day for hospital food
Edited on Sat Oct-18-03 07:28 AM by soup
http://www.sptimes.com/2003/10/18/Worldandnation/Bill_will_let_the_war.shtml">Bill Will Let the War Wounded Eat Free

A law forcing enlisted patients to pay $8.10 a day for hospital food appears headed for the scrap heap.
By BILL ADAIR, Times Staff Writer
Published October 18, 2003


WASHINGTON - Wounded soldiers will no longer have to reimburse the government $8.10 per day if they eat hospital food.

Congress has reversed a federal law that required thousands of soldiers who receive a meal allowance to reimburse the government for food they ate while hospitalized. The new law, which applies to soldiers who were injured or became ill while in a combat zone, also requires the government to pay refunds to those who were billed for hospital meals since Sept. 11, 2001.

The prime sponsor was Rep. C.W. Bill Young, the Largo Republican who chairs the House Appropriations Committee. He and his wife, Beverly Young, learned of the bills from Marine Staff Sgt. Bill Murwin, who lost part of his foot after a grenade explosion in Iraq. Murwin was billed $243 for hospital food.

The government has required the reimbursement from enlisted personnel since 1981. The goal was to ensure that soldiers were not "double-dipping" by eating hospital food and then pocketing their $8.10 meal allowance.

>snip<

Congress moved with remarkable speed to fix the law. Young heard about the problem in the spring and found unanimous support for the change. Sen. Bob Graham, D-Fla., introduced the Senate version, and Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., proposed it be retroactive to Sept. 11.

In the House, Young made the change by attaching an amendment to the $87-billion bill that pays for Iraqi reconstruction. He said he normally does not like to make legal changes with that kind of tactic, but he said he wanted to pass it quickly.

more at link above


As Martha would say, "It's a good thing."

Makes me wonder though, what else has been tacked onto this bill.

on edit- tried to make title more coherent :crazy:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
realFedUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-18-03 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think they'll eat better on $87 billion
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC