Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rummy on Iraq: We know for a fact that it's a violent country

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 01:44 PM
Original message
Rummy on Iraq: We know for a fact that it's a violent country
Presenter: Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld and Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Peter Pace Tuesday, November 29, 2005 1:22 p.m. EST

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

News Briefing with Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and Gen. Peter Pace

SEC. RUMSFELD: Good afternoon, folks.

snip...

And Iraqis are struggling to overcome the legacy of the Saddam era military, which punished initiative and centralized virtually all decision-making.


Let's be clear. U.S. forces are in Iraq to help the Iraqis fight the terrorists there, so we don't have to fight them here in the United States. Indeed, amid all the questions being asked about the situation in Iraq today, consider these:


Would America and the world be better off, would the American people be safer if the United States were to abandon the effort in Iraq prematurely, allowing the terrorists to prevail, or will the American people be better (sic) if we continue to work with the Iraqi people so that they're able to gain the experience and capabilities that they need to fight and defeat terrorists in their country?


Snip...

Q Mr. Secretary, are you concerned over -- and in fact, is the United States looking into growing reports of uniformed death squads in Iraq perhaps assassinating and torturing hundreds of Sunnis? And if that's true, what would that say about stability in Iraq?


SEC. RUMSFELD: I'm not going to comment on hypothetical questions. I've not seen reports that hundreds are being killed by roving death squads at all.


We know for a fact that it's a violent country. We know for a fact that there have been various militias. We know that there have been some militias that have been Iran-oriented. We also know there's been some militias in the north that have been very helpful. The Peshmerga have been very constructive in what they've done.


http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/2005/tr20051129-secdef4361.html



Does he mean there is a lot of violence in the country or that Iraq is a violent country?


Saddam centralized virtually all decision-making, but the Bush Administration paid off the Iraqi media. This is what Bush means by stay the course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Compared to the USA, they're amateurs at violence.
Their "violence" pales in comparison to our long history of slaughter and genocide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamahaingttta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. You don't know what you're talking about...
Just do some research some time, and find out HOW Saddam rose to power.

We're fucking pussies compared to those people!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Saddam killed millions? Like the US has?
Perhaps YOU should do a bit of research. You might start with the Indian wars, go on to the history of slavery here, push on to the Spanish American war and the subjugation of the Phillipines, add the firebombing of Tokyo, Hamburg, and Dresden, throw in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and take a look at Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Angola, and numerous others that we've murdered people in with gleeful abandon.

Compared to us, the Iraqis, and the rest of the world are mere novices at slaughter on a grand scale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, that's currently one of the "known knowns".
Just after the invasion, it was a known unknown. They were hoping for flowers and candy, but were willing to settle for control of the oil market.

Anyway, before that, the Iraqis' propensity for violence was an unknown unknown, since they didn't really give half a shit either way.

So you see we're making progress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Gee, you make it so perfectly clear. I see exaclatly where Rummy
is, knowing what the unknown is what it tis all about!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SkiGuy Donating Member (451 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. Just when you think
they can't possible say anything more stupid..along comes Rumsfeld with yet another gem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatrioticLeftie Donating Member (909 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. Oh good! I'm so glad
We finally got that highly relevant and controversial issue out of the way. Iraq is violent. Can we all agree on that? Good. Now we can get back to our lives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Iraq wasn't mired in violence until the US got there
What's highly controversial is how did Iraq become a hotbed of violence? Iraq today looks nothing like Iraq under the tyrannical rule of Saddam. And who can forget Rummy's little rendezvous with Saddam, who rose to power as an American ally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wookie294 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-03-05 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
9. "We know for a fact where the WMDs are located"
"The WMD is in the area around Tikrit and north, east, south and west somewhat."

"We have a lot of unknowns, but there are unknown unknowns."

Time for Michael Moore to make another movie! LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC