Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

With the Plamegate scandal, I almost forgot that the CIA hasn't really

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Seansky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 09:32 AM
Original message
With the Plamegate scandal, I almost forgot that the CIA hasn't really
been the good guy working for the good of the world...I just has a friend remind me of all the CIA "work" in other country affairs. Some with justifications and so just to protect US interest. And we know very, very little about any of that work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
chalky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. So the one good thing the CIA was doing was what they sabotaged?
We DO know Brewster-Jennings was tracking WMD. You would think (in a Frank Capra world, at least) that this administration would have been a little more sensitive to that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. Remember the CIA has two divisions: operations and analysis
Operations is the half that's been described as "frat boys with guns and no honor", and is the part that carries out all the "charming" activities of the CIA's "colorful" past.

Analysis is the more mundane half, and has caught hell from Ops and assorted outside hawks for ages because it had an ethic of providing the administration with the facts, regardless of the current spin. Naturally, this led the frat boys to consider Analysis to be a bunch of "liberals". There's been a 30-year war on this division, starting with the Team-B competition in the 70's (under Poppy Bush) and proceeding through the Reagan-Bush years, as CIA management was increasingly politicized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Funny how if you assert FACTS you are accused of liberal bias
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-05 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. Hopefully now they will work to oust b*shco
dubco was not interested in stopping weapons proliferation. Especially GFY cheney and poppy who profit dearly from moving weapons. I think Plame and Brewster Jennings were stopped for "their" purposes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC