Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John Dean: If Watergate had gone to the Grand Jury...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 08:13 PM
Original message
John Dean: If Watergate had gone to the Grand Jury...
...instead of a Congressional investigation, the facts would have been buttoned up. It was considered -- investigating Watergate through the DoJ was considered -- just for that purpose; to keep the facts from public view.

Yikes.

Is that why the WH has kept its hands off Fitzgerald's investigation? Because it was a strategic move? Because if Libby plea-bargains and no one else is charged, the facts will be buried?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Interesting point isn't it? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. and further....
...did Libby lie on purpose in order to hide more sinister crimes?

Fitzgerald said that he could not get at the underlying crimes because Libby "kicked sand in his eyes" by lying about the facts.

And so the underlying crimes are unaddressed.

Was that deliberate on Libby's part? Lie about the details so the darker crimes cannot be proven?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. But congressional hearings is what saved North and Poindexter.
The convictions were overturned on appeal because of the public hearings that preceded that prosecutions in court.

A Republican congress would give everyone immunity to testify, and the congressional immunity would shield them from prosecution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mme. Defarge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. But what choice do we have here?
Obviously, with our current congress, we're not going to get a congressional investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pryderi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. "Assault on the Presidency"
Edited on Fri Oct-28-05 08:21 PM by Pryderi
June 13 issue - From a distance, Watergate seems like a partisan affair. But that's because we tend to look at it nowadays through red- and blue-tinted glasses. In truth, President Nixon was forced to resign in 1974 by Republicans in Congress like Barry Goldwater, who realized from the so-called smoking-gun tape that he was a crook. This was after the Supreme Court—led by a Nixon appointee—unanimously ruled against him in the tapes case.

But imagine if Nixon were president in this era. After he completed his successful second term, I'd have to write a retrospective column like this:

President Nixon left office in 2005 having proved me and the other "nattering nabobs of negativism" wrong. We thought that his administration was sleazy but we were never able to nail him. Those of us who hoped it would end differently knew we were in trouble when former Nixon media adviser Roger Ailes banned the word "Watergate" from Fox News's coverage and went with the logo "Assault on the Presidency" instead. By that time, the American people figured both sides were just spinning, and a tie always goes to the incumbent.

The big reason Nixon didn't have to resign: the rise of Conservative Media, which features Fox, talk radio and a bunch of noisy partisans on the Internet and best-sellers list who almost never admit their side does anything wrong. (Liberals, by contrast, are always eating their own.) This solidarity came in handy when Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein of The Washington Post began snooping around after the break-in at the headquarters of the Democratic National Committee. Once they scored a few scoops with the help of anonymous sources, Sean Hannity et al. went on a rampage. When the young reporters printed an article about grand jury testimony that turned out to be wrong, Drudge and the bloggers had a field day, even though none of them had lifted a finger to try to advance the story. After that, the Silent Majority wouldn't shut up.

http://tabacco.myblogsite.com/blog/_archives/2005/6/10/922319.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. thanks for that info
Very interesting. I didn't know Hannity was that old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nothing Without Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. ***Links to VIDEOS of O'Donnell and John Dean on Countdown***
Edited on Fri Oct-28-05 10:02 PM by Nothing Without Hope
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=104&topic_id=5214707&mesg_id=5214707
thread title: ***OLBERMANN/COUNTDOWN VIDEOS: John Dean and Lawrence O'Donnell***

I'll also be posting a link to the show transcript in this thread when it becomes available, probably Monday afternoon/evening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC