Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Careers I'd like to see outlawed:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 09:40 AM
Original message
Careers I'd like to see outlawed:
1. Media pundits (Sit down and shut up already! Who asked you, anyway?)

2. Paid lobbyists on K St. or otherwise.

3. Paid political operatives and political handlers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. career politicians . . . n/t
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. "Career Politicians"
What do most of these "career politicians" hve in common? They started out as students at Washington DC or State Capital colleges "working pa, etc.t time" for a politician, then repeated that through grad school or law school (judicial intern), followed by a year or two in an "honors" or "intern" or "clerkship" program. They have never "worked" for a living - Santorum, Lott, Chief Justice Roberts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. i don't have a problem with career politicians
i have a problem with who pays for a career politicians re-election campaigns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
understandinglife Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. I'd vote to pass all three. And, I'll add a law that establishes ....
..... a "National Election Trust Fund" (State's can decide to emulate it, or not).

The NETF would be the ONLY source of capital for EVERY aspect of advertising a candidate irrespective of the medium used to transmit the ads -- internet, TV, radio, printed materials, etc. The NETF would be established by an allocation of tax revenue, within the budget for the Department of Justice, for both the funding of the NETF not-for-profit administering unit, the compliance unit within the DoJ, and the funds for each election cycle (un-expended funds would be held in a Treasury account for the use in the next election cycle).

Distribution of support from the NETF would be based on the following criteria:

1. A person files a petition for 'start-up' funds. That petition contains the verified signatures of 10,000 valid voters in the State the person intends to run for Congress; or signatures from 50,000 valid voters from anywhere in the Republic if the person intends to run for President. The 'start-up' amount would be $ 100,000 for those running for Congress and $ 500,000 for those running for President.

2. When a person wins the Primary, under whatever party designation they run, for either HR or Senate, they receive $ 5,000,000 total for the remainder of their campaign.

3. When a person wins more than five State primaries/caucuses for President, within whatever party designation they run, they receive $ 10,000,000 to continue their campaign until they reach their respective Party's convention and nomination. For every State primary they win after the first 5, they receive an additional $ 1,000,000.

4. When a person receives their Party's nomination for President, they receive an additional $ 50,000,000 for the remainder of their campaign.

5. The NETF is administered by a not-for-profit, non-governmental organization and is comprised of a Board of Trustees with five members and an administrative staff. Membership on the Board of Trustees is for only one term of four years and the only role of the Board of Trustees is to audit and certify the use of the funds of the NETF. Thus, the qualification for membership on the Board of Trustees must include professional recognition as an accountant and at least 10 years of experience at the Chief Financial Officer level in either a corporate, academic or not-for-profit organization.

6. Any violation of the NETF would result in the immediate loss of financial support for the candidate, a penalty to their respective Party, and their removal from the ballot for the election cycle in which they were a candidate for office. Any media organization, internet service provider, or other outlet for advertising discovered to be violating the NETF would be severely penalized. A special division within the Department of Justice would be chartered with the task of monitoring compliance by candidates, political parties, media organizations, etc., and they would be tasked with prosecuting offenders and levying penalties.

7. No political party, independent political organization, or any other organizational contrivance could be used by any candidate to generate advertising for their respective candidacy.


Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
5. Add "Consultants" to the list
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
6. SUV salesperson
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
the_real_38 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-16-05 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
7. War profiteers, er....
... defense contractor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
400Years Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-17-05 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
8. 4. Mercenaries
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC