|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Walt Starr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-07-05 04:40 PM Original message |
Tom Delay files wrongful prosecution lawsuit agains Earle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LisaM (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-07-05 04:40 PM Response to Original message |
1. What a jerk. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
me b zola (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-07-05 04:44 PM Response to Original message |
2. CNN reported it as breaking news |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IntravenousDemilo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-07-05 04:45 PM Response to Original message |
3. Fat lot of good it will do him. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
texpatriot2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-07-05 04:46 PM Response to Original message |
4. I really don't think he should keep toying with Earle. Is he just |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hobarticus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-07-05 04:46 PM Response to Original message |
5. If one can indict a ham sandwich, why the counter-offensive, Tom? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fleshdancer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-07-05 04:50 PM Response to Original message |
6. $10 says Earle is laughing his ass off over this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Syncronaut Seven (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-07-05 04:53 PM Response to Original message |
7. I believe you actually have to be prosecuted to alledge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bernardo de La Paz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-07-05 04:59 PM Response to Original message |
8. This kind of full court press defense is indicative of fear. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XOKCowboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-07-05 05:04 PM Response to Original message |
9. Aren't you supposed to file that kind of suit AFTER... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SalmonChantedEvening (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-07-05 05:10 PM Response to Original message |
10. Wholly Without Merit anyone? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-07-05 05:12 PM Response to Original message |
11. We'll see if it's wrongful, along with the Texas GRAND JURY. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aint_no_life_nowhere (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-07-05 05:24 PM Response to Original message |
12. Texas has the doctrine of "prosecutorial immunity" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Geoff R. Casavant (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-07-05 11:20 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. Then this suit is by definition frivolous |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-07-05 05:28 PM Response to Original message |
13. Repugs just love frivolous lawsuits |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
texpatriot2004 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-07-05 08:33 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Don't they though. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
never_get_over_it (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-07-05 08:47 PM Response to Original message |
15. Jesus DeLay |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Proud2BAmurkin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-07-05 09:05 PM Response to Original message |
16. That sounds like obstruction of justice nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paineinthearse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-07-05 11:36 PM Response to Original message |
18. The usual rethug strategy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 08th 2024, 12:17 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC