Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I have a theory

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 08:02 PM
Original message
I have a theory
Could it be that those "16 words" were never in the SOTU text? Could Dubya have just added them in the moment? Could it be that just like how he recently got his stories mixed up(Saddam wouldn't allow inspectors even though we all know he did) his lazy brain retrieved a strategy they were going with as truth at one point and he just forgot? Could it be the real coverup is not intentional deception but that he's so stupid, such a puppet, and really really just doesn't giive a shit about anything he's saying when he's playing president that he just messed up? This occurred to me when I just read that it wasn't in any of the drafts. Also at one point they demanded that Hussein let the inspectors back in fully expecting that he would refuse and Saddam called their bluff.

There's a logic to this. Everyone knew the documents were forged. They allowed the "evidence" to be removed from a previous speech. How many times do you think they make him rehearse? He's nervous, some said sedated how far-fetched is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DagmarK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nah, Bush could never come up with something on his own.......
He makes ZERO decisions.........

He doesn't know what's happening from one day to the next...

He does what he is told.

The only independent thing he does is when he shoots off his mouth when gets a surge of "God I'm good" or "THAT guy pisses me off". And that's it.......

(Can you imagine him being your dad? yuck)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RevolutionStartsNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. Interesting theory
and answers the question "Who PUT the words in there?"

But I would've thought that they would have run some damage control immediately afterward, or at least would have been prepared to be challenged about the statement. Far as I can see, they didn't even decide Tenet was to take the fall until right before he did just that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Shrub ADMITTED that HE put it in the SOTU. I posted a link yesterday
and saw him say it on TV. He absolutely and unequivacolly said, "If I thought it was wrong, I would not have put it in" (my recollection, but very sure it's essentially a quote)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Please don't think so much
I am having such a good day!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SayitAintSo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. Ya know ? You may have nailed it .... H a Ha
Wouldn't that be some shit ?

"POTUS wings SOTU speech".... Faulty intelligence is really.....

FAULTY INTELLIGENCE .....?

( Who da' thunk it ? )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. remember that old saying
(Bush is) like a mushroom . . . kept in the dark and fed bullshit. That stupid f***er just does what he is told by his puppetmasters. They figure the less he knows the less he can screw up when speaking off the cuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Athame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. I don't think so. Those words were too carefully crafted
to be extemporaneous. It was a very conscious intention to imply something that could not be impeached. {subliminable suggestion there, if we all just try to use that word in every possible context, maybe it will catch on} :silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
morningglory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. Naw, his lips move when he reads and he
was definitely reading off that reflective thingy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
9. They deliberately used it
but they thought they would bypass any contention by pinning it on the Brits.

However, if you recall, it was Bush, the national embarrassment, himself, who insisted on putting that bit about the "axis of evil" in one of his speeches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 11th 2024, 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC