Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Junior capable of 'sacrificing' Cheney??

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
mlawson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 07:05 PM
Original message
Is Junior capable of 'sacrificing' Cheney??
There have been posts saying that 'various intel members are calling for Cheney's resignation', etc etc. No, it's not to that point yet, but VPs go far more quickly than do presidents (real or imposters). Just ask Spiro...

But my question is, could Junior dump Cheney (or let him take the fall in this scandal)?? That would seem the easy way, if not 'out' at least maybe as a delaying tactic, and at best, Cheney as scapegoat. Could Junior personally demand his resignation?? Who would help him? How would the WH camp split up???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Code_Name_D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. You don't sacrifice the King.
Cheeny is the one truly running the show. Bush is just a show peice to hide behind. The real question is, will Cheeny Sacrifice Bush?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mlawson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Cheney is probably being allowed to run the show.
If our suspicions about the Bush family Evil Empire are accurate, Poppy bush has the real power, along with whichever clandestine groups are the powerbrokers. I doubt that Poppy would allow Junior to be sacrificed. Besides, Cheney at the top of the ticket in 2004, does not win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. The decision will not be W's to make
This when the 'power's that be' kick in and take over. Most of what happens from here will be negotiated between the Congress and the WH. I believe Congress will try to follow the Nixon model for a peaceful transition and I hope W and his minions will be graceous enough to accept their fate without putting up too much of a fuss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DODI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. He can still does what he does.
Just because he resigns doesn't mean he can't use a phone. I don't know about Poppy -- still review his Tufts speech every now and again. The people W has are the people dad rejected. I really think it is Barbara.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mlawson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I agree: he would have to be given the idea.
Slowly, in Basic English, but enough would get through to get a plan in motion. Other than through impeachment (which the WH would NOT want!), the only way to get a VP to resign, is a direct order by a president. Right??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. Bush had a "committee" to choose his VP candidate...
...they made a pretense of interviewing several possibilities, before Cheney chose himself. Cheney is a lynchpin for the neocons. Pull the lynchpin, and the house will crumble. Richard Pearle only resigned as chairman from the DPB, so now he merely exercizes his conflict of interest as a chair. We can't accept that kind of "accountability". Take out Bush's 'most trusted advisors', and he'll crumble under the weight of his own ineptitude. Remember, during the 2000 Campaign, the defense for Bush against stating the obvious (that he was a stuffed shirt with a name, and a damned lousy resume) was to say he'd surround himself with "good", "competent" people. Recent events have demonstrated that these men and women are neither "good" nor "competent", and they sure as hell don't act like any "adults" I know or respect. Honesty and integrity back in the White House my ass, maybe it's been buried under Cheney's energy papers and George's lies. "Clinton-Gore have not led, we will"...and they have, they've led us into war, recession, terror, fear and divisiveness. Time to let them show the way for all the neocons, straight into exile, maybe in Afghanistan or Antartica...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
a_random_joel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. Sure
Cheney goes back to Halliburton to recover his "war chest".

Condi steps in for 2004 campaign.

Cheney still gets to pull all the strings.

Ain't life grand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
8. The reverse may be true
Cheney may dump gump!

Think of how much dickie must be disgusted of the boy-who-would-be-king....

Old dickie has the residency with in reach...all he has to do is take down the current resident. And he's the one man who can do it. Dickie could, all by hisself, arrange to be done with the puppet.

Now don't worry....if dickie takes out boy george, the weight of all his shananigans would soon mean the end of his own rule.

I suggest we all go easy on poor ol' dickie....he is the one person who can end at least one half of this regime, almost overnite!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mlawson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I can see two diferent scenarios here:
1) Agreeing with you, Cheney sees is chance for ultimate power in HIS name. A guy like that, it must be eating him alive every day, anyway, the craving, that is. But he knows it would be only for a short while; his removing GWB would categorically DOOM their chances in 2004, even if they make it that long. Would he do it anyway?

2) Cheney knows that the only member of the WH junta who is remotely electable in 2004 is bush. (At least the way things are right now.) If he dumps Junior, 2004 is toast, in case Cheney still has hopes for then. Does he forego his own desperate hopes to be prez, and try to keep Junior viable???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Dick could think he'd be elected in 04
The way things are going, re-selecting the boy is looking less and less likely. So what has he to lose by dumping gump now and shoring up the base? Hell, he could go so far as to LIHOP another attack and blame it on the former resident.

This may be dickie's only chance to become the ruler. Only one little thing stands in his way....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
9. Losing Cheney would mortally wound the administration.
They are in deep trouble now, I think. Cheney and Bush will go out together after the election. Neither of them can withstand sunlight, and the clouds are starting to roll back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Who cares? They'll run off with the cash they grabbed and leave the mess
to the next guy to clean up. They probably hope it's a dem, they can spend the next 4 years smearing and undermining him. It's what they do. Sometimes they get a longer run at it, like in the 80s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PretzelWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
12. that would be known as a lobotomy. LOLOL
Bush surrounding himself with talented people is like a hole surrounding itself with a donut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
13. Yeah, poor guy. He'd have to trudge off to his solid gold ambulance
to weep over his towering pile of Halliburton, Bechtel and Carlyle shares. Nurse? Ready my daily bath in the finest Iraqi oil! Never mind, make that the blood of Middle Eastern babies!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jab105 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
15. I think he might....
I think Cheney might be sacrificed...

And Guiliani picked as VP candidate for 2004...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JasonBerry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. No Way Giuliani
Giuliani would be too much of a threat in 2008 if the '04 ticket were to win. The 2008 Republican nomination has one name on it:
Jeb Bush.
The criminal dynasty would not allow Bush to replace Cheney with anybody that could be a threat to Jeb Bush and the continuation of the Bush Cartel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
16. He won't have to
I see a strong microwave emission in Cheney's future.
Click, click, click --- bzzzzz -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Game over for Dick Cheney, courtesy the CIA.
It will be listed as natural causes, but if if happens,
watch the rest of the PNAC bastards scatter like
cockroaches in the light.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mlawson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Wouldn't be surprised.
Someone posted a statement here at DU a few months ago that impressed me greatly: "You do NOT fuck with the CIA, or M16!!!" This was during the time when Blair was arguing over the bad intel that he had supposedly got, or something like that, and it seemed that he was trying to blame M16 (the British version of the CIA; I think that I have the name right). The CIA might have taken a fall for bush right now, but there is no telling what they will do to get back at the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JasonBerry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Look at what happened to JFK
Edited on Tue Jul-15-03 08:19 PM by JasonBerry
(edit for typing error)

Not that it really matters, it's actually MI6 (British Secret Intelligence Service). Your point is well taken. It wasn't long after JFK's "scatter the pieces into the wind" speech about the CIA and he was dead. MI6 and the CIA are not exactly Home Interior or Department of Veterans Affairs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comradebillyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
20. bush has lots of cash
will it be enough to buy his way out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC