Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clarification--doesn't Bush already control the NG?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 06:02 PM
Original message
Clarification--doesn't Bush already control the NG?
I think I'm confused about what Bush wants Blanco to do.
Isn't the NG under his jurisdiction already?

What specific changes does he want her to make?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
knowbody0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. he wants control of the state
the ng answers to her first as gov of state
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberaliraqvet26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. not when they are activated by the governor
only when they are federalized (hense the ones in IRAQ)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. So how come NG didn't get there sooner...
dropping food/etc.? Was it her responsibility to ask them to deliver water, etc.?

Were the NG there from the start? I do know she had to request more and that it was a shortage of resources thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Because the request sat on bush's desk until Thursday
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. but that doesn't make sense if they're not federalized, BUT....
I think it was Mayor Nagin that noted that there were only 250 NG available at his disposal the day before Katrina hit. So the question begs to be asked...how many NG did the state have and how many have already been federalized and sent to Iraq? This is the question I've been wondering since day one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. technically it is a state militia
you know the one that is permitted to really keep and bear arms, the well regulated kind.

It functions in cooperation with the Army etc. The state part is mostly a legal fiction EXCEPT for that pesky posse comitatus bit that prohibits federal armed forces from acting in a law enforcement capacity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Democrat Donating Member (142 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Isn't Blanco a Republican?
I heard her referred to as a Democrat Governor today!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. No, she's a Dem I think.
Uh oh, I think I'm getting all confused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Janice325 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Governor Blanco is a Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. A state's guard is part of the "organized militia". Louisiana has an
"unorganized militia" that consists of all persons between 17 and 64, with some exceptions, that the governor can activate under state law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. And Bush suspended posse comitatus in LA, right?
Did he also in MS?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Is that true? Posse comitatus pertains to use of active duty forces
for law enforcement, not such things as humanitarian aid.

I thought National Guard troops were assisting NO police officers in law enforcement and that is a legal use of a state's guard. I also thought that active duty forces were not involved in law enforcement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. on edit: According to this, he did:
Edited on Mon Sep-05-05 07:04 PM by tjdee
http://www.atsnn.com/story/167184.html


One of the comments references this BBC article sentence:
"Mr Bush said their priority would be to maintain law and order, and to assist in aid and evacuation efforts. "

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/4211528.stm

And in this DU thread....At least one person interchangeably uses "martial law" and "posse comitatus". http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x1736970#1737126

There was a post yesterday (?) or so about Bush "suspending some laws" in the early morning, and some of the replies said posse comitatus because of the active duty guys showing up.

Short answer, I don't know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. A state's guard is under the command of its governor until a president
calls them to active duty.

Guard members take two oaths, one as members of a states guard and the second as members of the national guard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. So whose fault was it that no water drops were made?
Maybe I didn't have enough coffee today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. ON EDIT: I misunderstood your point. It appears that either the Governor
Edited on Mon Sep-05-05 06:17 PM by jody
or the President are responsible for no water drops. It has to be one or the other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjdee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. I understand what you said, but...
I'm in a discussion with some on another board, and martial law has come up. I'd like to say that Bush wanted Blanco to federalize the NG, which you and others have explained nicely--but it raises another question for me.

All week long, I and others have been wondering why no one dropped food/water to those people. I personally assumed it was the National Guard, under Bush's direction, who either weren't there or weren't given the orders to do such.

If the NG is under Blanco's direction, obviously she would have given them orders to drop water/food.

I'm missing something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. No, it was I who misunderstood your question and I corrected my reply.
P.S. Technically, Louisiana does not have laws for martial law but it does have similar laws that a governor can use when an emergency is declared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Fema's, once bush declared the area a disaster area, which he
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyranny_R_US Donating Member (988 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. and FEMA answers to DHS and DHS answers to....?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. I thought FEMA and DHS both answered to Homeland Security
am I wrong? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Exactly HOW MANY NG was under control of the State and HOW MANY
are in Iraq? Do we have NG in Afghanistan?? What exactly are the numbers??

This creeps me out. If there's this much confusion regarding the NG in LA, then I can only imagine how the other states are doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Star Donating Member (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. DHS = Dept. of Homeland Security
FEMA is a part of DHS. DHS is a cabinet-level position that answers to the President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-05-05 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Brain fart!
I have no excuse! Sorry about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC