Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Randi just mentioned the "Gore commision". What was that?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 04:45 PM
Original message
Randi just mentioned the "Gore commision". What was that?
Regarding alirline safety?

Who has a link. I needs a little edjumication.


(insert snazzy sig here, cuz the DU death-bot ate mine)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Google is your friend
Final report
http://www.fas.org/irp/threat/212fin~1.html

http://archive.democrats.com/view.cfm?id=4532

The Gore Commission Demanded Tougher Airline Security, But Airlines And Conservatives Said No
Janet Hessert

"The federal government should consider aviation security as a national security issue, and provide substantial funding for capital improvements. The Commission believes that terrorist attacks on civil aviation are directed at the United States, and that there should be an ongoing federal commitment to reducing the threats that they pose."
Gore Commission final report, February 12, 1997

On July 25, 1996, shortly after the crash of TWA flight 800, President Clinton asked Vice President Gore to chair a commission on improving air transportation safety. As a result, the White House Commission on Aviation Safety and Security, commonly known as the Gore Commission, conducted an in-depth analysis of the U.S. commercial airlines' safeguards against terrorist attacks. In its final report, the Gore Commission found that security measures used by U.S. airlines were extremely inadequate, and made over fifty recommendations to improve security.
Among the changes suggested by the Gore Commission were:
3.1. The federal government should consider aviation security as a national security issue, and provide substantial funding for capital improvements.
3.2. The FAA should establish federally mandated standards for security enhancements. These enhancements should include standards for use of Explosive Detection System (EDS) machines, training programs for security personnel, use of automated bag match technology, development of profiling programs (manual and automated), and deployment of explosive detection canine teams.
3.7. The FAA should work with airlines and airport consortia to ensure that all passengers are positively identified and subjected to security procedures before they board aircraft.
(more at link)



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Thank you!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. That was the commission whose recommendations, had they been
Edited on Fri Aug-19-05 04:58 PM by ET Awful
followed, would have prevented 9/11 because there would have been no cockpit access (if I'm not mistaken the recommendations called for the reinforced doors now required), better monitoring of passengers, etc. Most of those suggestions were ignored by the airline industry and their lobbying prevented congress from making the recommendations into actual law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-19-05 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Thanks!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC