Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did Schmidt really say 'vets not qualified to serve in public office'?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
lostnfound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 04:57 PM
Original message
Did Schmidt really say 'vets not qualified to serve in public office'?
Is this a paraphrase, or did she really say it..??
According to this thread:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x1971799

American vets from Iraq war not qualified to serve in public office, GOP US House candidate says in Ohio
by John in DC - 7/28/2005 06:10:00 PM

This is bad, seriously. Paul Hackett is running as the first Iraq war vet to run for Congress, and now his GOP opponent, Jean Schmidt, just said that being an American vet from the Iraq war is the wrong kind of experience for a member of Congress. I
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Son of California Donating Member (467 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. this cooky B---- is her own worst enemy!
man, we're right there folks, right on the cusp of victory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Did she really???
Let's see if the RNC will wipe the shit off this gals slippers. What do ya say Ken?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostnfound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. I don't KNOW if she did; that's why I'm asking.
The post that I referenced isn't specific enough to any particular interview or quote. If we can identify the quote it's worth making an issue out of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomAngel82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well then I guess by her notion
Edited on Sun Jul-31-05 05:02 PM by FreedomAngel82
John McCain, John Kerry, John Glenn, Max Cleland, Wesley Clark, Al Gore and etc. shouldn't have served public office. Don't forget President Eisenhower. He was a general. :eyes: What a maroon and anybody who agrees with her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Betty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. president moron is a vet
we're all supposed to believe in his having served in the National Guard.. so I guess by her own standard, he shouldn't be serving? Or would she argue that since he never actually served, he is in fact qualified?

What a piece of shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Left out Jackson, and Washington
Oh, and Poppy, JFK....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taxloss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. And where is her campaign manager?
Edited on Sun Jul-31-05 05:21 PM by Taxloss
Spanking someone?

Edit: typo-laden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. He's giving gynocological exams
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. You know, I am beginning to suspect that Republicans do believe in
a caste system. Only they won't call it such. Just that it makes sense now that in the us vs them mentality of the right, there ARE sublevels of "thems." I just never put it all together before now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leeroysphitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. Republicans only pay lip service
to our veterans. Slashing the V.A. budget, dishonoring and vilifying heroes like cleland, McCain and kerry for political gain' not to mention sending those who were selfless enough to volunteer in the first place to serve into harms way based on outright lies...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
10. George Washington was a military vet.
Fuck her and the horse she rode in on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. Isn't she president of some "Right to Life" lobby?
I guess that gives one the breadth of experience to confront any political issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
13. Actually, what I heard her say
in a news report ( forget where) was ( this is my paraphrase) that experience in combat did not necessarily translate into leadership on other issues. Before you kick my ass, I support Hackett and sent money to his campaign (I'm from New York and Hinchey is my rep) and I think Schmidt is Shit. Then, though, she went on to say that, again my paraphrase, that the war wasn't really that much of an immediate issue to her constitutents and blah blah bullshit bullshit bullshit. And in some ways, that, at least to me is far more damning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
faithnotgreed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. thanks for sharing what she said.... that was the question of the op
and were glad youre here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
14. The pigs in the GOP are always back stabbing veterans...
Under the draft, Rumsfeld said, conscripts were inducted, trained, then released after two years, "adding no value, no advantage, really, to the United States armed services over any sustained period of time."

Critics said Rumsfeld was dismissing draftees as useless and noted that more than 20,000 conscripts died in the Vietnam War. In a statement Tuesday, Rumsfeld apologized to "any veteran who misinterpreted my remarks."

http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4155/is_20030124/ai_n9615155

"any veteran who misinterpreted my remarks."

I heard the no good worm, loudly and clearly! Not only does the nasty bast*d trash all us old soldiers, but then he tries to say it's our fault he said what he said! I saw the no good snake, when he made the statement on TV. I understood, what I heard come out of his sorry, lying, ungrateful, vile, mouth! The first thing that popped into my head that day, was the draftees that never made it back home.

Rumbo would have been fired on the spot, if Bush wasn't of the very same mind as Rumbo, about the value of the American Soldier's service to this country!

I'm glad Rumbo or his cowardly, ungrateful, back stabbing, cronies in Washington, wasn't ever watching my back in a bad situation!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Fungible
I remember that. He called them fungible, like a fricking commodity. What a creep he is. Fungible, BTW is something that can be used interchangably.


fun·gi·ble ( P ) Pronunciation Key (fnj-bl)
adj.

1. Law. Returnable or negotiable in kind or by substitution, as a quantity of grain for an equal amount of the same kind of grain.
2. Interchangeable.


n.

Something that is exchangeable or substitutable. Often used in the plural.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-05 05:54 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Just numbers, to the 5 bean counting neocon "planners" at DoD.
cannon

1. A large mounted weapon that fires heavy projectiles. Cannon include guns, howitzers, and mortars.


fod·der

1. Feed for livestock, especially coarsely chopped hay or straw.
2. Raw material, as for artistic creation.
3. A consumable, often inferior item or resource that is in demand and usually abundant supply: romantic novels intended as fodder for the pulp fiction market.


All the draftees from the period Rumbo was harping about, are now just "needy" class citizens, to those greedy class brass hats and war "Planners". We troopers needed our asses shot off, so that they could erect hotels on Boardwalk and Park Platz. Bushco and the neogangsters want to play Cowboys and Arabs, with our kids as the game pieces. But when the game is over, those soldiers too, will be nothing more than just needy "liabilities", to the ghouls in charge of "MORALITY" at the Pentagon. RUMBO, is the most rotten apple in that entire barrel of "bad apples" in Washington!






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-31-05 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
15. Some Ohio DUer needs to get to one of Schmidt's appearances and ask
if she supported Clinton in 92 & 96, since in both of those elections, he faced vets!

Puleeze, somebody in Ohio do this for me? ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC