Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Judy Miller is really the leaker, isn't that bad news for us and good

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 02:14 PM
Original message
If Judy Miller is really the leaker, isn't that bad news for us and good
for Karl Rove and Libby?

It would mean that Rove and Libby really did find out because of a journalist, and could really weaken any criminal complaints against them. Especially if it was CIA folks who gave her the info.

I have no sympathy or compassion for that hag Judy Miller--she's a foul propagandist. But, trying to pin stuff on her actually helps the bigger bad guys in the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Rove and Libby aren't even
being investigated for the leak, knowledgeable sources say.

They're in trouble for perjury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. Because they said they found out about it from a journalist. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. Well we know that is a lie then
Because when Libby and Rove's lips are moving they are lying.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #14
31. That's only one lie
that Fitzgerald is investigating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Al-CIAda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #14
48. The CIA analysts explicitly refuted any such 'absolution' last week.
Confirming the story, that is, providing legitimacy to its publication was/is the larger potential crime that they do not escape. It required a confirmation to be printed, hence the question/outing. Rove/Libby provided that confirmation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. Except that it doesn't get Rove and Libby off the hook
As government officials, they aren't supposed to reveal covert operatives no matter how they found out. So even if the Fucking Queen of All Iraq (as Miller has styled herself) told Rove and Libby about Valerie Plame, they weren't released from their job obligations so they could go running off to Bob "Douchebag for Liberty" Novak -- and who knows how many others -- to take petty political revenge against Joseph Wilson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. Someone had to leak to Judy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. The rumors being circulated are that her sources were in the CIA.
That scenario is very, very helpful to the administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Riiiiiiight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. I wonder who would be passing along unsubstantiated rumors like that?
Edited on Fri Jul-29-05 03:03 PM by NNN0LHI
Any guesses? I bet it ends up being a real asshole. Who was it that told you if you don't mind me asking?

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A-Schwarzenegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #13
32. Excuse me while I fall off the turnip truck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #32
53. ....
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. YES!!!! YES!!!! YES!!!!
Not to mention that this is the story that Luskin had been peddling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. It doesn't matter
if someone passes secret info to a person with a secret or top secret clearance they must by law (and the oath they took) report that person. They must also refuse to verify the info to the person who told them. If she told them and they didn't report the breech...
they have committed a crime. But then this is the Bushit administration and lies, tyranny etc. seem to be the order of the day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. Technically true, but it also weakens the case if a hack like Judy
Miller is going around town spreading this shit at cocktail parties.

I suspect this "pin the blame on the Judy" game comes from Rove sympathizers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #16
39. Rove team
I suspect this "pin the blame on the Judy" game comes from Rove sympathizers.

Absolutely!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
42. Your indefinite pronouns have lost me
if someone passes secret info to a person with a secret or top secret clearance they must by law (and the oath they took) report that person.

So, if Miller told Rove a top secret, then Rove must report Miller?

They must also refuse to verify the info to the person who told them. If she told them and they didn't report the breech...
they have committed a crime. But then this is the Bushit administration and lies, tyranny etc. seem to be the order of the day.


So, Rove commits a crime if he doesn't report Miller for telling him secrets?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thinkingwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. no, because...
unless Judy Miller has security clearance and access to the info herself, she was leaked to by SOMEBODY.

I have no sympathy for Miller and I'm not fond of her, but these rumours that she might be THE source are planted by Rove sympathizers to take heat off of him, Scooter Libby, Cheney, Bush, Bolton, and the WH kitchen sink. Don't fall for it.

She is protecting somebody she fears more than jail. It is as simple as that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Thought I read that
that she was afraid of someone. Something about 'they have a lot of power'. No link in particular just thought I read that a couple of weeks ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truth2power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
28. Right. Said she wouldn't testify because the govt is too powerful.
There was some dispute about whether she said exactly that, but one poster claimed there was video - her court statement.

I think she's afraid of cheney.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #28
52. The video is at CBS news. Here is the article, and on the right side
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. The theory is that she got her info from the CIA. That helps the Bushies.
Remember, part of their scheme was a pushback against not only Wilson, but the entire CIA.

Think about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. WHY would the CIA out one of their agents?
Answer me that.

And in your sentence about their pushback you attribute motive to Rove et al, NOT to the CIA.

You are contradicting yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AirAmFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
29. No--IMHO, the most likely original source of the leak is JOHN BOLTON!
Bolton and Miller were tight for a long time. They had many neocon friends in common and a longstanding leaker-leakee relationship. For example, back in 2002, Bolton had a hissy-fit when Secretary Powell shut down his campaign to accuse Cuba of bioterrorism. The only MSM taker for this disinformation was: Judith Miller.

See also http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=1663146&mesg_id=1663567 .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thinkingwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #29
51. I have a hunch about Bolton
I think that's a good theory. It really sounds plausible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. SOMEBODY had to tell SOMEONE
Edited on Fri Jul-29-05 02:21 PM by mtnester
I mean, this information did not just RAIN out of the sky or fly out of someone's ass when they weren't LOOKING
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kilroy003 Donating Member (543 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Sometimes you find out things by
pure accident.

Like if Judy was talking to her friend about the Wilson's and suddenly her friend says, "Y'know, my ex-boyfriend who was a janitor at the CIA building once told me that the guy who was sent to Niger used to show up once in a while to take Valerie, one of the agents at work, out the lunch and she'd come back all red in the face and breathing hard."

Then Ms. Miller puts two and two together, checks out a marriage certificate and voila, you have yourself some classified information.

I'm not defending her or the traitorous bastards in the WH...

But it could happen. IMO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Then she should just say so and be out of jail then
Obviously the scenario you suggest is not the case or she would have.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. ROFL
:spray: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. The point is that it makes it harder to pin perjury on Rove and Libby
if there really was a journalist out there leaking stuff.

It also completely undermines the criminal case if people in the CIA were leaking shit about their own agent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Motive.
What motive would the journalist have had?

What motive did Rove et al have?



Oh and nice try, geek.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
20. Judy gives many, many indications of not being your usual "reporter"...
A lot of folks here think she IS CIA, as in rogue CIA, as in Operation Mockingbird CIA, as in Judy, Karl and Libby all working for the same boss.

Now, who's the boss is anybody's guess, but Dick Cheney's name has been dropped a few times in this regard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bouncy Ball Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Which brings us right back to the bush administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
23. Ms. Miller is a BushCo Butt-Kisser
I believe she is protecting WH sources, but Rove and Libby are in deep. Prosecutors have come down pretty hard on people that divulge CIA sensitive material and it's hard to believe they would skate on that, but then again most of the WH type prosecutions end up being for perjury or obstruction of justice type things. Regardless, I hope both Mr. Rove and Mr. Libby become Big Buck's wife in prison real soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qanda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
25. Where is this coming from?
Did I miss something?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Thanks for asking
I was wondering the same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Read about it here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A-Schwarzenegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. Oh, blogulation, well, case closed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. I'm not buying it either. Just saying that we should be careful about
which memes we push.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A-Schwarzenegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Which meme are *we* pushing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. The one that got all the buzz yesterday was the "Judy Miller did it"
meme. It's tempting to push that because Miller is such a dishonest rightwing propagandizing hag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A-Schwarzenegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #37
38. I'm confussled. Isnt that what this/your thread is "pushing"??
Arent you right here right now "pushing" the "rumor"
from "speculation" on a "blog" that "Judy Miller did it"?
Help me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #38
43. No, I'm trying to get us to take a closer look at it and examine
what the motives behind and implications of it may be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A-Schwarzenegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #43
47. What is "it"? You know what? Never mind. Good luck
with whatever it is you're trying to do/say.
The thread is a blurry echo of loopy speculation
on a blog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Modem Butterfly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
30. Judy Miller was in so good at the White House...
...she probably heard it from them, which would explain why she's in jail right now.

And in any event, revealing classified info is still a big no-no. If 200 people know a classified secret, such as the name of a covert operative, and person #137 tells #201, #137 will go to jail, the other 199 don't enter into it at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
julialnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
34. Rove said he learned from Novak
N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Binka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #34
44. Oh Good Fucking Jesus
Edited on Fri Jul-29-05 03:59 PM by Binka
Rove does not get info from reporters he feeds them that shit. This entire thing in my opinion leads to Cheney. End of my rant. Cheney. Mark my words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
julialnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. of course I agree with you
but the post asked if Judy Miller was the "leaker" to Rove. Of course I know what Rove was saying and that he was planting information. I was trying to say that I don't think Rove is the one Judy Miller is protecting (although he is of course involved). I agree it probably is Cheney (I also wonder where Wolfowitz is during these hearings).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
40. One leaker among many in a chain
Edited on Fri Jul-29-05 04:15 PM by chill_wind
And .. I think you can't really talk about Judy Miller without talking about Chalabi and the Pentagon, and I think you can't talk about her and the Pentagon without talking about her special association with Feith's Office of Special Plans in particular. Or so suggests this good background piece here:

The Source of the Trouble
Pulitzer Prize winner Judith Miller’s series of exclusives about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq—courtesy of the now-notorious Ahmad Chalabi—helped the New York Times keep up with the competition and the Bush administration bolster the case for war. (5 page feature)

http://newyorkmetro.com/nymetro/news/media/features/9226/index.html

I think this link has been circulated here before, but it's a gotta read, IMHO.

She is a very significant part of the chain, it's fair to assume, but it is a multi-linked chain. And Rove still has plenty of problems within his own alignment along it.

I keep in mind always a lot of John Dean's writings, wherein he suggests that even if Rove were not proven a leaker, he is stlll part of a concerted effort (conspiracy) and could be facing other charges aside from any under IIPA and perjury-- ie other conspiracy statutes.
"Wilson's wife is fair game" stuff.

IANAL, but the longer this goes, the more that emerges, the more I think there could be plenty of assorted indictments to go around and remain very hopeful.

Still, we can expect much, MUCH more of a furiously intensive campaign of lies and dysinfo between now and October. It will get louder and crazier-- we probably haven't seen anything yet. The RW internet crazies were totally blind-sided from their denialist sleep on this matter just a few weeks ago. You can be sure, with the incredible stakes involved here, that they are now drilling down very very hard 24/7 right now for every bit of propaganda they can find.

Every day that goes by that we don't have a new leading detail or revelation is one they will fully seize and fill the void. It's a long time between now and October. And don't forget the resources of the swiftvet type operatives. I could see them getting totally immersed in something very foul behind the scenes. The wingers haven't even gotten started, I fear.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #40
54. excellent piece and very illuminating
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
41. Which "us" are you talking about?
Paleface....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #41
45. People who want to see Bush's junta taken down. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #45
49. Are you part of that "us"? I've seen very few, if any, posts from you....
...to indicate that you have any issues with the NeoCons.

Correct me if I'm wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bpilgrim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-05 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
50. lol - too funny
Edited on Fri Jul-29-05 04:38 PM by bpilgrim
Plame's Identity Marked As Secret
Plame -- who is referred to by her married name, Valerie Wilson, ... 2003, as he headed to Africa for a trip with President Bush aboard Air Force One. Plame ...
www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/20/AR2005072002517_pf.html

:tinfoilhat:

peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC