Anyone Who Thinks Bush And Rove Haven't Had Long Discussions

[ThomWV]

Over the leak, both before and after the leak, and right up until the present, is simply delusional. The question should not be "Why doesn't Bush call Rove in and ask him what happened?". The question should be "What did Rove say when Bush called him in and asked him what happened?"

It is utterly inconceivable that they two of them could be alone in the same room and the subject not come up. It is preposterous to deny the conversation has not taken place.

[blm]

1. Bush was in on it. He has the vengeful streak of his old bat mother, Babs.

Pure evil.

Bush has pulled dirty tricks for campaigns for over three decades. Did anyone think he stopped out of decorum, civility, or maturity?

[Fridays Child]

2. They've discussed it ad infinitum.

And the WHIG is probably grinding its gears as we speak.

[wli]

3. you mean "why isn't Bush indicted?"

[mr_hat]

4. Doubtful. The Chimp's probably on a need-to-know basis. And >

there's so little knows or needs to...

[Skittles]

6. I am with mr_hat

I don't think they clue that incompetent asshole bush in on ANYTHING unless it is ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY.

[Bernardo de La Paz]

5. Yes, Good way to put the Question . . . nt