Could this be the "tectonic plate shift" Josh has been hinting at?
- It's one thing when the Downing Street Memos state that the Bush administration "fixed" the intel on Iraq.
- It could be quite another thing if a prosecutor with subpoena power (Fitzgerald investigating the Plame leaker) has Bush administration officials perjuring themselves under oath about fixing the intel on Iraq.
"...not about who leaked Valerie Plame's identity, but who was behind...those phoney Niger uranium documents"I've gotten hints or suggestions from several sources over the last month that new information is bubbling to the surface,
not about who leaked Valerie Plame's identity, but who was behind the underlying caper that started the whole drama afoot in the first place: those phoney Niger uranium documents.
--
Talking Points Memo==========
Rove Time-line: It's still about fixed intelligence, stupid!The intelligence about Uranium was just one of the piece of an array of fixed intelligence, and the Plame leak was just a small part of a propaganda effort to disseminate the fixed intelligence and give credence to it and to discredit anything that contradicted the fixed intelligence.
The cabal that coordinated the dissemination of that propaganda was called the White House Iraq Group. Rove was one of its leaders.--
Daily Kos==========
"...the White House Iraq Group, a little-known task force..."("Story originally posted here was accurate but out-of-date and posted in error.")Many of the documents subpoenaed Friday relate to
the White House Iraq Group, a little-known task force. Newsweek reported that the group was created in August 2002. The Newsweek report cites an earlier Washington Post article that lists senior political adviser
Karl Rove, Bush advisers
Karen Hughes and Mary Matalin, national security adviser
Condoleezza Rice and
Vice President Dick Cheney among the group's members.
-- via
Atrios==========
Have another slice of Yellowcake, KarlA close look at the Plame outing might lead a conscientious investigator to scrutinize some of the issues raised by the story that originally led to the Plame outing -- that is, the report of a wholly mythical effort by Iraq to purchase 500 tons of yellowcake uranium ore from Niger.
If there are strands of evidence that tend to walk the responsibility for the production and/or disseminaton of those forged documents back to this side of the Atlantic, and if any of those strands lead towards the U.S. government, or "an internal working group dealing with Iraq" . . . well, Rove (and others) might find that perjury charges are the least of their worries.
--
Billmon==========
Paper ChaseThere were 2 separate sets of Iraq documents allegedly proving a uranium deal with Iraq.
I came across something confusing about the original Niger yellowcake story: the seeming existence of
two separate sets of documents allegedly proving a uranium deal with Iraq.
Beginning shortly after 9/11, a foreign intelligence service -- maybe the Italians, but my guess is that it was someone else working through the Italians -- starts a drip campaign to persuade the CIA that Iraq is still trying to get the bomb.
Meanwhile, at the other end of the pipe, we have Cheney, constantly pushing for more evidence to show that Iraq is seeking to build a bomb. And,
lo and behold, each time Cheney pushes, a new report surfaces from an unnamed foreign intelligence service claiming Iraq is trying to buy uranium. And whenever the skeptics push back with evidence that casts doubt on the thesis, yet another foreign intelligence report surfaces, with more detailed, albeit, false information.By late summer of 2002, the battle has ended in something like a stalemate.
The deadlock is broken in September by the MI6, the British intelligence agency, which provides the Blair government with information for a white paper on Iraq's nuclear program. The paper charges that Iraq "has sought the supply of significant quantities of uranium from Africa."
But, while all the journalistic and investigative sturm und drang has focused on the October 2002 Italian forgeries, it seems to me the more interesting question is the origin of the first Niger documents -- the ones provided to the CIA in the fall and winter of 2001-02.
The later Italian forgeries were obvious fakes -- so obvious you can only wonder about the true motives of those who tried to pass them off. Were they really designed to implicate Iraq? Or, as Seymour Hersh has suggested, where they deliberately planted in order to discredit the Cheney White House?
Sy Hersch:
"The agency guys were so pissed at Cheney," the former officer said. "They said, 'O.K, we’re going to put the bite on these guys.' "What about the original Niger documents -- the ones the CIA and the DIA found so credible? Who created them? And what was their exact relationship to the SISMI, or MI6, or the CIA, or the Cheney White House?
The really intriguing question is this: Is there anybody out there armed with subpoena power -- like, say, the FBI or Patrick Fitzgerald -- who is trying to find out the full story?
--
Billmon==========
Depiction of Threat Outgrew Supporting EvidenceBy Walter Pincus, Washington Post
August 10, 2003
The escalation of nuclear rhetoric a year ago, including the introduction of the term "mushroom cloud" into the debate, coincided with the formation of a White House Iraq Group, or WHIG, a task force assigned to "educate the public" about the threat from Hussein, as a participant put it.Systematic coordination began in August, when Chief of Staff Andrew H. Card Jr. formed the White House Iraq Group, or WHIG, to set strategy for each stage of the confrontation with Baghdad. A senior official who participated in its work called it "an internal working group, like many formed for priority issues, to make sure each part of the White House was fulfilling its responsibilities."
In an interview with the New York Times published Sept. 6,
Card did not mention the WHIG but hinted at its mission. "From a marketing point of view, you don't introduce new products in August," he said.
The group met weekly in the Situation Room. Among the regular participants were
Karl Rove, the president's senior political adviser; communications strategists
Karen Hughes, Mary Matalin and
James R. Wilkinson; legislative liaison
Nicholas E. Calio; and policy advisers led by
Rice and her deputy,
Stephen J. Hadley, along with
I. Lewis {"Scooter"} Libby, Cheney's chief of staff.
A "strategic communications" task force under the WHIG began to plan speeches and white papers. There were many themes in the coming weeks, but Iraq's nuclear menace was among the most prominent.
'A Mushroom Cloud'The day after publication of Card's marketing remark, Bush and nearly all his top advisers began to talk about the dangers of an Iraqi nuclear bomb.--
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A39500-2003Aug9?language=printer">Walter Pincus, Washington Post, August 10, 2003
==========
http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/nation/ny-usleak0305,0,3272655,print.story?coll=ny-top-span-headlines">Air Force One Phone Records SubpoenaedThe federal grand jury probing the leak of a covert CIA officer's identity has subpoenaed records of Air Force One telephone calls in the week before the officer's name was published in a column in July, according to documents obtained by Newsday.
Also sought in the wide-ranging document requests contained in three grand jury subpoenas to the Executive Office of President George W. Bush are records created in July by
the White House Iraq Group, a little-known internal task force established in August 2002 to create a strategy to publicize the threat posed by Saddam Hussein.
--
http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/nation/ny-usleak0305,0,3272655,print.story?coll=ny-top-span-headlines">Tom Brune, Newsday
Related Links:
-
"Narrowin' the Noose" -- Digby-
Google "air force one" "iraq group"-
Google "iraq group" fitzgerald-
Google "iraq group" subpoenaGOP Swept from Power in 2006; Impeachment Looms{Edited Subject}