Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Enough of the "Clintonian" Crap...even from DU'ers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 06:17 PM
Original message
Enough of the "Clintonian" Crap...even from DU'ers
Edited on Mon Jul-14-03 10:47 AM by trumad
I just read one post on DU where the poster said that Bush is starting to sound like Clinton... :WTF:

If you continue to buy the right wing myth that Clinton was a habitual liar than you are no better than the Winger's themselves....

As far as I remember... Clinton lied about Sex and nobody died...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RememberTheCoup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. here, here. well said. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RememberTheCoup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
62. I mean "hear, hear." :-)
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShaneGR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
116. You got that right Bubba, GO BUCKEYES
I'd call 23 million new jobs vs. 3.1 lost jobs a BIG difference....

I do wish Clinton would have kept his "Manhood" in his pants for a few more years but, I don't think a private affair is anyones business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. I long for the day when ...
the only thing a President is lying about is a BlowJob.

Cheers
Drifter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DagmarK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. I long for the day when a weekly BJ is required for the prez!
No kidding,....

sexual repression is NOT a good thing for the dude or dudette who controls the nuke black bag!

I want the bag holder to be VERY relaxed, happy and downright euphoric!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #9
18. Comparing the last two administrations -
I think I prefer the President to be getting regular blow jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
molly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. Good for you - this needed to be said
if that man were to somehow be able to run for office - he'd have my vote over any other candidate!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomReload Donating Member (171 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. Nobody died????
Tell that to the people he bombed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Explain yourself....
So what you are trying to tell me in your er...simple minded way is when Clinton said he did not have sexual relations with Monica he then ran off and killed a bunch of people....

YA see...thats the kind of right wing bullshit that you hear day in and day out..... Thanks for making my point!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreedomReload Donating Member (171 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Go Rent "Wag The Dog"
It explains the method of distraction Clinton used.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #12
16. How about staying on the topic?
Most of us have seen "Wag The Dog". Entertaining movie. Now, do you have actual facts to discuss, or are you just being cute?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Friar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #12
27. LOL
So it's ok for Bush to get hundreds of Americans killed alongside thousands of Iraqis for oil but Clinton joining the UN to stop the ethnic cleansing in Bosnia is criminal? Time for a reality check, methinks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #12
33. Funny, the movie was actually about Poppy and Gulf War 1
Maybe you should re-rent it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Twenty3 Donating Member (361 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #33
43. LOL you beat me to it
It WAS written about Sr ... and applies just as well to Jr.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Remark Donating Member (28 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #33
118. Actually, it was a non-partisan movie
I support Clinton's actions in Iraq and Afghanistan. History has proven him right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
101. No, No, No !!! DON'T Rent The Fucking Movie, Read The Goddamned Book...
It was based on: American Hero by Larry Beinhart

http://images.amazon.com/images/P/0345366638.01._PE_PIdp-schmoo2,TopRight,7,-26_SCMZZZZZZZ_.jpg

Link: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0345366638/qid=1058223644/sr=2-2/ref=sr_2_2/104-5171716-9547132

It's a fictional hard-boiled detective novel, that interweaves facts from the FIRST Iraqi war. It's relies on REAL events from the Bush I administration, and is a mind-blower, because it's so well footnoted, that you have to try real hard to keep the fiction seperate from the fact. It's also curious that Hollywood decided to 'update' the story for Clinton's term. I would love to know how Beinhart felt about that little switcheroo!!!!

If ya haven't read it, you should.

:thumbsup: :hippie: :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #101
102. I'll second that
It's deranged, subversive, hilarious. Sort of a sideways roman a clef with all your favorite Bushies and Reaganauts. It was so much fun that I'm sorry I'll never get to read it again for the first time...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sava Donating Member (158 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Right, Clinton bombed more people than Bush...
Why do people forget this? And also, Clinton sponsored the famine-creating sanctions on Iraq. He also turned a blind eye towards corporate profiteering in Iraq... Hello? Halliburton?

Clinton is better than Bush, but no angel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. I assume you have sources on all this.
Enlighten us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sava Donating Member (158 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #10
25. unless you live in a cave...
Iraq was bombed on a regular basis from 1993-2000, when Clinton was in office... he bombed Kosovo, unjustifiably... I saw the devastation with my own eyes. Haiti, Somalia, and God knows who else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #25
31. Your comparison baffles me.
Yes, Clinton's administration bombed Iraq to enforce the no-fly zone. It's tragic that other methods weren't found. And yes, the incursion into Kosovo was wrong. I would argue it was done with noble intentions, but plainly that isn't going to hold a lot of water here.

Still, to compare Clinton's acts with Dubya's takes a gyration worthy of Stretch Armstrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. Why do you think Kosovo was wrong?
The Serbs were attempting "ethnic cleansing" of the Kosovars. Rape campaigns were being conducted against Kosovar women, while their men and young boys were being dumped into mass graves. NATO decided to intervene, and the genocide was ended.

Why do you think that was a bad thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #35
40. As I recall, the UN proposed an intervention earlier and was rebuffed.
In my post, I said that I believe we had noble intentions. I wish that other efforts had been tried first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #35
65. poor tactics
Edited on Mon Jul-14-03 02:49 PM by blindpig
The problem with the Kosovo campaign was that it was "air only". That is no way to fight a war, no matter how many Air Force generals say otherwise. In his desire to minimize America losses and his poll #'s
Big Bill gave the serbian fascist lots of time to do their "work". Sufficient ground forceswould have fixed the Serb positions, allowing combined arms doctrine to do it's deadly magic. My beef is that the Serbs were not dealt with properly by George I.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #35
66. Most of that has been debunked
The Serbs were attempting "ethnic cleansing" of the Kosovars.
Few Kosovars were forcibly removed, the vast majority of those in the camps were simply refugees fleeing the fighting.

Rape campaigns were being conducted against Kosovar women
And KLA soldiers were raping Serbian women. It was a brutal war and both sides perpetrated this particular atrocity. The bigger story here is that there was no "campaign". While there were rapes, the U.N. investigators were only able to find a few women who were actually raped. Most of the stories of the rapes included the phrases: "I knew a girl...", "My friend told me...", "A girl told me...", "I heard a story...", or "I suspect...". In other words, evidence free hearsay. A battlefield urban legend with just a hint of fact which they happily parroted to the reporters after crossing the border.

while their men and young boys were being dumped into mass graves
As of yet, there is still no real evidence that this ever happened on the scale we were led to understand. We now know that most of the men and boys that were taken, were taken by KLA operatives looking for more soldiers. The "mass graves" that we were shown mostly contained the bodies of dead KLA fighters and unfortunate civilians who got caught in the crossfire. It does appear that there may have been a few genuine mass killing in a handful of villages, but again these were done by both sides, on a very small scale, and may have had more to do with local politics than some nationwide genocide plan.

Heck, the International Criminal Tribunal formed by the United Nations to prosecute Serbian war crimes, which contained NO Americans or American appointees, freed ALMOST ALL Serbian military field commanders held for Kosovo crimes from prison citing the utter lack of evidence that any such crimes had occurred. Heck, even during the ongoing Milosevic trial at the ICC, the prosecutors had to go back and add additional indictments for Bosnia and Croatia (where real war crimes DID occur) after they realized that their Kosovo case was so weak that they would never get a conviction.

What you also don't hear in the news today (well, the BBC ran a big expose on it a while back) is how Kosovo has become a virtual cesspool, with both the European drug trade and the European slave trade using the crimelord controlled nation as a distribution point for their wares. The peacekeepers hide in their bunkers when the cameras aren't around, Serbian Christians are being killed or driven out and thousand year old Christian shrines are being destroyed every day, there is no real government or law enforcement with any muscle, and the crime lords rule the streets like kings. Hell, you can BUY a 14 year old Armenian virgin on the streets of Pristina for a few thousand bucks...and I don't mean to "use" for an hour, I mean you OWN her. Yeah, we really saved these people :eyes:

Kosovo and Iraq are two brilliant examples of American presidents using their military might for dubious political purposes and to increase their poll ratings. In both cases there was no legitimate and justifiable reason for the invasion, in both cases the media jumped on the bandwagon and sold the American public a false bill of goods, and both places have gone to utter hell since we invaded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sava Donating Member (158 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #66
71. thank you Xithras
There are very few people who know what really happened in the former Yugoslavia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sava Donating Member (158 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #35
70. this is not true... read me post below...
A few isolated incidents occurred, and Serbian forces were removing commanders who were commiting war crimes. It's war... that happens in war. The western media campaign made the Serbs look like Nazis... and that is not true. In fact, it's terribly insulting considering the Serbs were left high and dry when the Nazis invaded. And even when the Serbs fought the Nazis using guerilla tactics and partisans, the Allies left Serbia to the Russians, and the Communists took over. My family was lucky enough to escape, and it wasn't until the mid 90's when we were able to see our long-lost family... only to see the US and NATO bombing my country and spreading lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EOTE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #25
63. Kosovo? Unjustifiable?
I think the tens of thousands of ethnic-Albanians whose lives were spared would disagree with that. I fail to understand how so many democrats seem to have a problem with Clinton's military intervention in regards to ethnic cleansing and genocide. How was this an unjustifiable military action again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sava Donating Member (158 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #63
68. myths about ethnic-Albanians--- TRUTH, not propaganda
The only "mass-graves" found in the entire region had no more than 7 bodies.

Women and children were not being killed by Serb forces.

The KLA (Kosovo Liberation Army) is an Albanian terrorist group with Al Qaeda ties.

The KLA routine bombed civilian targets, and targeted women and children in gun attacks.

The Albanian civilians involved were being LEGALLY deported back into Albania.

The Albanian groups illegally settled in Kosovo and then demanded independence. Imagine illegal immigrants in the Southwestern US demanding to be an independent nation. What do you think the US would do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iluvchicago86 Donating Member (422 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #68
73. Thanks sava...
for the reality check.I like your handle, btw.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iluvchicago86 Donating Member (422 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #68
74. Thanks sava...
for the reality check.I like your handle, btw.:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sava Donating Member (158 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #74
77. hehe thanks
I'm in the Chicago area as well... are you Serbian?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iluvchicago86 Donating Member (422 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #77
84. 100 percent
through and through! Are you serbian?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sava Donating Member (158 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #84
103. Serb here ;)
Yup... well.. honestly... I'm a mutt. My dad is half Macedon, half Czech; my mom is half Croat, half Serb. So I'm 3/4 Balkan-bred. :-) I don't speak as much as I'd like, but know enough. Do you know of Kragujevic and the massacre? My grandfather was a survivor. He fought for a British/Serbian partisan group until the war's end, then lived in West Germany, in a refugee camp near Bremen, until 1958 when he, my Baba, my mother, aunt and uncle, came to the United States.

We go to Holy Resurrection church off the Kennedy, near O'hare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iluvchicago86 Donating Member (422 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #103
108. Holy Resurrection...
is that the other name for the church on redwood drive?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #108
110. hi guys I know you know me but I dont know sava well
I have no Serbian in my blood I am part Slovenian your Catholic neighbor not Croatia I know you folks suffered by them too. I dont know much about Kosovo I do know that Clinton did bomb Belgrade for a while and he did get condemned by the liberal party wing members. Kosovo was not Clinton's finest hour he was grand domestically but he did some bad stuff overseas not that good. The DUers here critical of Clinton are not freepers Sava was in Belgrade is that right. Ive talked to chicago here a good many times now and she has told me she has no love for Milosevic either. These arent our enemies embrace them even if they disagree with this one thing Clinton did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #68
75. Yeah, yeah and Milosevic is a nice man framed by baddies
I know of these cock and bull stories. I also know the truth. The whole world does by now. Nice try.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sava Donating Member (158 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #75
78. You know what you saw on CNN... I saw things with my own eyes.
You can continue to live in the fictional world... or you can take the read pill and join us in reality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Friar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #78
89. I took the read pill
and am now joining you in realty.

Sorry, couldn't resist...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DagmarK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. The sanctions were imposed by the UN!!
I think it's a nice thing to have a prez who actually FOLLOWS UN resolutions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CWebster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #14
37. US strong-arming the UN on sanctions.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
38. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 01:24 PM
Response to Reply #38
47. Actually the No-Fly zone was not a UN mandate
It was totally a US action but Clinton did follow it. Clinton was a good Republican President and our last elected President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
52. Clinton did not create sanctions in Iraq
He inherited them from Daddy Bush, who created them ostensibly to pressure Saddam to pull Iraqi troops out of Kuwait, then decided on a whim to use them to topple Saddam. Clinton inherited the Bush family vendetta on Saddam. Not sure he did what he could have done to disinherit himself, but he definitely didn't "start the fire" as Billy Joel might say. Also, it was Clinton's rules that Halliburton was violating in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
46. Because of his lie??????????
Where you coming from? Do you think lying about sex got people killed??? Lying about WMD definitely got people killed. Which is worse?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sava Donating Member (158 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
5. Clinton is a liar... what's your point? Why can't you accept it?
Bush is worse... but that doesn't exonerate Clinton. He disgraced the office of the President with his actions and then his lies. He shouldn't have been impeached, but he was a liar.

Clinton was good for the economy, that's about it. I want to keep him and his sect of the DNC (Hillary, Gore) out of the White House. Let's get a progressive in there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DagmarK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. Oh Sava, I can just tell you are going to make LOTS of friends here!
Welcome to DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. err - somehow I don't think that's Sava's goal, DagmarK!
Just a hunch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sava Donating Member (158 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. Imagine that... a liberal/leftist who hates Clinton
I'm not here to make friends. I'm here to discuss issues and express my opinions. If people hold my views against me in a personal way, that's their problem, not mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. So then - - discuss already!
Still waiting on those sources, chum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sava Donating Member (158 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #26
72. sources for what? a BJ?
Slick Willy got a BJ, then lied to the country on national TV. My sources are my own eyes and ears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DagmarK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #24
28. Oh, I think it will be more YOUR problem than THEIRS......
Stick around......spew your lying rhetoric about the Big Dog some more..... you are swimming upstream without any arms. That's YOUR problem, not THEIRS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #24
34. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
joe_sixpack Donating Member (655 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #24
92. You have to keep in mind, Sava
That to many of today's democrats, Clinton fills the role that Reagan occupies in the thoughts of most republicans. As such, they tend to overlook his faults and embellish his achievements. They don't take kindly to anyone who tries to knock him down from the lofty, sentimental place they have elevated his legend and stature to. It's similar to those freeper sites that froth at the mouth and fight tooth and nail to defend their guy from anyone who brings up the obvious, that Bush is no conservative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sava Donating Member (158 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #92
105. I know, some liberals treat Clinton like Reagan...
And Reagan was as evil as they come. I'm still torn on Ronnie, though, was he really so evil, or was he just a puppet for the conservative agenda of that time? It's a disgrace there's an aircraft carrier named after him, and an airport... the man that tried to break up the aircraft controller unions. That's irony for you... :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msmcghee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
30. You are way off base.
This shows how the basic repuke strategy of repeating a lie enough times - makes it apparently true - regardless of the facts.

He disgraced the office of the president? Bullshit.

As far as the office of president is concerned he was probably one of the finest presidents in the history of this nation - as proven by the list of accomplishments above. I can recall no president in our history that accomplished so much - while being attacked at every turn by a well-financed pack of scum who were out to destroy him - and didn't care how much they damged the nation in the process.

What do you think being president is about? I can understand when bloviating repukes wail on about the only thing they were able to pin on him - a technically accurate statement about something that was nobody's business to be asking about - that had absolutely nothing to do with running the country. I personally don't give a damn how many blow jobs he got.

It's so sad when I read these inane statements here on DU - because it shows how easily the average person (even some purportedly ion the left) can be mislead by a PR program to believe the very opposite of the truth - when, with a little effort, they could be using their brains to think for themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sava Donating Member (158 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #30
81. sorry, I'm not part of the moral decline
Denial and hypocrisy are dangerous things. Sexual relationships are private matters. To engage in a sexual relationship at the office, the office in this case being the WHITE HOUSE, is inappropriate. The greatest insult to the American people came in the form of a TV address. Slick Willy looked us straight in the eye and lied. He didn't just lie to those on the right. He lied to everyone.

The Republican response was even more inappropriate and obscene. A matter of this nature should not have been brought to the public eye, and the amount of money and man-hours wasted on "investigating" this matter should be criminal.

With any job, there are certain responsibilities. Silly me, but getting a BJ in the oval office seems inappropriate. I wish the liberals stuck in denial would get over themselves and simply accept the fact that the man lied and made a mistake. The sooner you guys admit he made a mistake, the sooner he can be forgiven, and we can stop debating this nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #81
94. "moral decline"?
Oh, good god.

I'm not a huge fan of Clinton, but please. Yes, the man lied, but you said it yourself - sexual relationships are private matters. End of story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #94
109. not a big fan either its not the blowjob that did it for me
From what I learn about Kosovo it seems like there should had been a different way other than bombing Belgrade to hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MODemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #81
97. Who are you, the forum patrol of your values?
We don't have to admit anything, no more than you have to admit that you think it was wrong for Bush, while in his twenties, to impregnate a fifteen year old girl, and made her have an abortion. You didn't see Clinton having his trist, nor did I see Bush having his trist with a minor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sava Donating Member (158 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #97
107. that's known as "F'ed" reasoning... ;)
So if I commit murder, can I go into a court of law and say, "But Hitler did so much worse." ? I think not... You don't HAVE to admit CLinton was a liar. But by not doing so, one is a hypocrit. Those who throw stones should not live in glass houses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phatfish Donating Member (403 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #81
99. my sentiments exactly, sava
Clinton's misdeeds concering Monica are MINUTE compared to the witch hunt that followed by the mostly Republican "mob". However, this does not clear Clinton from blame. He cheated (I personally feel recieving oral sex from someone other than your spouse cheating, you may not) on his wife in the oval office while he was on the job. Clinton did many great things for our country. I feel he was a very good president and he had wonderful ideas but had to persue them in a HIGHLY FLAWED system.

I feel it is great to question Bush's actions while in office. That is our right as citizen's. However, when you say that while touting CLinton as doing nothing wrong when it came to Monica, then I FEEL you are being ignorant to the facts, which also seems to be one of our rights as citizens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #81
134. I don't mind at all admitting he made a mistake and lied about it, but
I still believe he certainly has been the best President in my lifetime (I'm 62) and possibly one of the best ever. I wish he was back and I'm sure most DUers wish the same. BTW, we also love Hillary. I believe she also was the finest First Lady ever, with the possible exception of Eleanor Roosevelt. Do our heroes make mistakes? You bet. However, they are still our heroes. Your demeaning them will not change a thing. I know that there are people who post regularly on this forum who don't particularly like the Clintons, but the majority of us do. Dissent is permitted and welcomed. Going too far, however, might upset a lot of us, me included.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
54. Clinton "disgraced" his office?
That's an RNC talking point, Sava. You have such high respect for the office of presidency that you think being human in it disgraces it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sava Donating Member (158 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #54
82. yes... disgraced
Would you engage in a sexual act on your grandmother's bed? Or better yet, a grave? No... because it is disrespectful and disgraceful. What Clinton did was wrong. Accept it.

The Republican response, however, was much worse than what Clinton did. Don't misunderstand what I'm saying here. But a wrong on one side doesn't negate a wrong on the other. For instance... if I borrow from Bill Maher, OJ SImpson was guilty AND the LAPD were racist and corrupt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Friar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #82
88. no one gives Clinton a pass
on his adultery, or his stupid denial. The only point we are making is that it was and is irrelevant. It was of concern only to his wife and child, not the nation. You are trying to comingle this issue with political considerations. That dog don't hunt, as the south is wont to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #82
117. How can Clinton disgrace the office if it already had been disgraced?
Give me an f'ing break!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #82
120. What you feel about what Clinton did is not universally shared.
Accept that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 02:27 AM
Response to Reply #82
137. I never thought he disgraced the oval office
After all, it was his. He was there hour after hour, day after day. He was practically glued to it, unlike *. There is a private bathroom and study, and I think a mini-kitchen that also go with the office. Where the hell else could he have had sex? If your answer to that is that he shouldn't have, that's a matter of opinion. I believe that he shouldn't have lied to the nation about it when confronted. I don't give a damn that he had a blowjob, or many blowjobs, in the oval office. Really, it's not a throne, it's where he lived for eight years. I am sure this is not the first time that the oval office was used for something other than phone calls and meetings. IMHO, it's just ridiculous to compare it to your grandmother's bed or a grave. A lot of Americans thought then and still do that this was a matter between Hill and Bill and noone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Friar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
91. lies?
That's plural. Gimme another besides Monica.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MODemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
96. Please list the lies you are talking about
If anyone would ask you about your sex life or lack thereof, would you be truthful? I don't think so, most people would not because it's absolutely no ones business as long as both parties are consenting adults.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andromeda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
112. I don't know who you are
but your views on Clinton aren't going to win you any friends on a Democratic board. Oh---sorry, I forgot, maybe you're a green. Greens are no friends of the Clintons.

Gotta tell you though, I find your views on Clinton, Serbia and Kosovo offensive. Clinton did the right thing by stopping the ethnic cleansing. There were mass graves full of dead Muslims killed by Serbian soldiers that prove that this did go on and that Milosovic was responsible.

Milosovic wasn't tried as war criminal for nothing, you know.

When Clinton lied about sex, nobody died. When Bush lies, people die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NicRic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
7. You got that right !
President Clinton worked tirelessly for this country and did a history making job ,of showing how hard work pays off.Now we have the anti Clinton , and the results are obivious !
Bill and Al's report card
Clinton/Gore administration acheivements:
1. The longest economic expansion in our history.
2. The creation of more than 22 million new jobs.
3. The lowest unemployment in 30 years.
4. Real wages rose at all income levels.
5. The highest home ownership in American history.
6. Unemployment reduced to 3.9 percent.
7. Hispanic unemployment reduced to 5%, the lowest level on record.
8. African-American unemployment reduced by 50% to its lowest level ever recorded.
9. The lowest welfare rolls in 32 years.
10. The lowest crime rates in 26 years.
11. Teen pregnancy and drug abuse were down.
12. Student test were scores up.
13. The number of people without health insurance was reduced for the first time in a dozen years.
14. The size of the federal government was reduced by over 340,000 workers.
15. The federal budget was balanced.
16. The Reagan-Bush federal debt had finally begun to be reduced.

The record speaks for itself !!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wes_clark_for_pres Donating Member (51 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
49. God I miss all that "Clintonian crap!" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baffie Donating Member (362 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
13. THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!

And I'm with molly above, I wish he could run for another term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JitterbugPerfume Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. When I hear certain buzz words and phrases
I know we are being infiltrated AGAIN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demnan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
15. In order for Bush to sound like Clinton . . .
He'd first need an IQ transplant of about 100 points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Merlin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
20. In fact, Clinton actually KEPT his campaign promises.
I'm not the only one who was absolutely astonished that he kept his focus on the deficit and actually turned it around. Virtually nobody in America thought he could do it. It wasn't easy. It cost him dearly politically. But he did it.

This guy was and is the greatest public figure of our time.

And he ain't done yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SweetZombieJesus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. He didn't keep all of them
Including one that I felt was very important: Pardoning Leonard Peltier. He managed to pardon that criminal fuck Marc Rich, but the poor Indian activist who didn't get a fair trial is still in jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yella_dawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. What astonishes me...
Is that Clinton accomplished anything at all with the psychotic witch hunt that pursued him almost his entire time in office. Can you imagine what he might have done with a sane congress and the RNC in irons?

yella
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MODemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
21. I'm very tired of the Clintonian "comparisons" myself
I've noticed in nearly all editorials, if the writer is angry with Bush and all the crap he pulls, they throw in something like: (Well,
even Clinton didn't help much in that area or Clinton lied too, but). It beats the hell out of me why they have to use President Clinton as a punching bag or as a way to measure Bush's bumbling.
The Clintons have been harrassed for ten or twelve years already,
and the taxpayers of this country have paid the price for it. It's time that Bush is criticized on his own "merit." Of all the years we've had to listen to the idiots from the right, who, if they had a brain, they would probably take it out and play with it; it's payback time, (quit throwing Bill Clinton into everything), and let him have it. I read in Bartcop that John Kerry said "Clinton is an unusually good liar", a few years back. This is real good feed for Limbozo and the others.

~~~~~~Go DEAN~~~~~~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #21
29. I sure know how to draw them out...don't I
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ldf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #29
113. yes
would you please stop that? it makes me get my panties in a wad.

damned uncomfortable.

x(

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #21
36. Bush should be judged on his own demerits
It doesn't matter who was president before him, he has been a disaster in his own right.

(I do admire Clinton tremendously, but even if Shrub had followed Reagan, Shrub's record would be dismal.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sideways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #36
41. Just Like The Right Is Blaming Tenet On Clinton
Okie dokie kids yes sir ree Bill did appoint Tenet to head the CIA. But BUSH kept him there! Go fucking figure. So now the time has come to dump Tenet and this should be Clintons error? Ahh shit grow the fuck up GOP apologists.

Bush opted to keep Tenet in place. His choice his fucking responsibility.

Let us hold the fucking AWOL, coke snorting, DUI, wanna be a PLAYA fuckwittage accountable.

The fucking perp DOES NOT GET TO BE A VICTIM.

Anyone who has been the victim of abuse can tell you this:

The abuser when all hope is lost will play the victim card.

Fuck these assholes.

End of rant.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
32. And Technically he didn't lie about even that
According to Independent Council's office "Sexual Relations" did not consist of a blow job. Their own legal description and Clinton followed strictly their rules and was ambushed. By their own definitions he did not lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoppin_Mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
39. Dumbya doesn't have enough brain cells to sound like Clinton !
He can't even form a coherent sentence.

I think it's time for a FREEPER PURGE !

It's a well know FREEPER tactic to invoke Big Dog to try and divert the focus off dimwit dumbya.

BAN THEM ALL !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Friar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #39
44. Don't ban the Freepers!
I run out of humorous content pretty quickly and these guys just keep it coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
42. In Sava's DEFENSE & about Clinton. How many enemies will I make?
Edited on Mon Jul-14-03 12:56 PM by Tinoire
I think people do not understand where people like Sava are coming from. Sava actually lived in Kosovo, I believe, when these bombings were taking place. We all KNOW our media doesn't report these things so why should we be surprised and attack someone simply for trying to make us aware that our hero- your hero, my hero- Bill Clinton was no saint, no liberal and no humanist. It's just that we had it good back then and weren't paying attention. Most of us didn't start paying attention until Bush stole the White House- I know that's when I REALLY perked up and started digging.

So anyway, this post is my sad plea, at the risk of making enemies at DU, that we open our eyes also if we are that interested in peace and justice. How can we make intelligent, well-informed choices for the up-coming primaries if we can't even deal with what our main rep, Clinton, did in our name during his watch?

We are SO sadly uninformed of what really went on in Kosovo, Serbia & Iraq under Clinton. What we did in Columbia was heart-breaking...

Wellstone Calls on President Clinton to Explain Criteria for Selecting Bombing Targets Says Senate Must Ensure That U.S. is Observing International Rules of War[br />
Senator Wellstone: Pause The Bombing Before It's Too Late To Avoid A Wider War

Congresswoman McKinney Says "NATO Should End The Bombing"


Sava, I've seen you in other threads and certainly don't think you're a disruptor but you're bringing up unpleasant and unknown facts that are difficult to deal with.

Those of us unwilling to even entertain the thought that Clinton did anything wrong should use this as insight into how the average American feels when we assault them with everything Bush is doing. They are just as ignorant NOW as most of us were THEN.

I'm with Sava on this one- regardless of how big a Clinton fan I am. Clinton was a great President for the US- I voted for him twice and would vote for him again but I AM ashamed of the atrocities which took place in Kosovo under his watch. Both Clinton and Blair (sound familiar?) are are seen as war crimes by many over this... Just do a google and see...

Sava, maybe you should tell people where you were living, what you've seen and experienced and maybe they'll understand where you're coming from otherwise you do risk coming across as a freeper/disruptor to those who don't know.

Under Clinton, we bombed Serbia on Easter Sunday! Kosovo is still a mess and both Clinton and Blair are seen as war criminals by the general populace. It was also under Clinton that Iraqi civilians were bombed and terrorized daily. Just want to be real here.

We are an imperialist, war-mongering, exploitative nation and we need to come to terms with that if we want to make things better otherwise we are no better than the freepers who bury their heads in the sand anytime something less than complimentary is said about Bush or Reagan.

I would like to think we are all better.

---------------------------------------------------------------

Successful operation or war crime?
International hearings hold Clinton, Albright, Cohen responsible


NEW YORK -- The Geneva Convention, The United Nations Charter, the Nuremberg Principles, the Helsinki Accords and the U.S. Constitution have all been violated by Bill Clinton, Madeleine Albright and William Cohen, according to charges filed by the Commission of Inquiry of the International Action Coalition.

Nearly 800 persons participated in the inquiry hearings. Charges are primarily grouped around those of "starting a war," the "deliberate targeting of civilian infrastructure" and "violating and destroying the peacemaking roll of the United Nations."

There are 19 charges detailed in articles and paragraphs from major international treaties and even the U.S. Army Field Manual 27-10 (for planning, announcing and executing attacks intended to assassinate government leaders and selected civilians, e.g. "friends of Milosevic," the Yugoslav president). U.S. commanders and NATO/State Department spokesmen were so ignorant or arrogant about international treaties and laws, according to the charges, that they even publicly boasted of highly illegal actions and destruction of non-military civilian targets. For example, targeting Yugoslav journalists was a violation of Article 79 of the U.N. Charter. Bombing fertilizer plants and a cigarette factory was a violation of the Geneva Convention about hitting non-military targets.

"Inflicting, inciting and enhancing violence between Moslems and Slavs" was one of the charges. Aggravating conflict between Slavs and Moslems and injecting U.S. troops for future actions to control Caucasus oil exports was the argument of committee chairman, Ramsey Clark, former attorney general and a former marine. He argued that the Orthodox and Muslim worlds were potential centers of power that could thwart Washington's "imperialist objectives." It had been pointed out that Washington purposefully brought in Turkish planes (with no military necessity) to bomb Serbian Slavs in what could have been an effort to revive centuries old hatreds from Turkish colonial rule.

<snip>

Ramsey Clark referred to Spanish pilots who had refused orders to attack civilian targets. A commission study referred to testimony in the Spanish newspaper, ARTICULO 20, of Captain Martin de la Hoz, "Several times our colonel protested to NATO chiefs about why they select targets which are not military targets.... They are destroying the country, bombing it with novel weapons, toxic nerve gasses, surface mines dropped by parachute, bombs containing uranium, black napalm, sterilization chemicals, spraying to poison crops and weapons of which even we still do not know anything." The United States and President Clinton were singled out as the prime motivator for the war and the "overwhelmingly responsible nation" for its atrocities and legal violations.

<snip>

The rest is at: http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=17147
---------

Wellstone Renews Call For Bombing Pause

WASHINGTON - May 13 - Senator Paul Wellstone renewed his call today for a brief, conditional pause in NATO airstrikes, and urged President Clinton and NATO to make greater diplomatic exertions to resolve the Kosovo crisis. In a speech delivered on the Senate floor, Wellstone urged the Administration to seize the opportunity created by last week's G-8 agreement on Kosovo, and to press forward with energy towards a UN Security Council resolution to implement it.

Wellstone repeated his call from ten days ago for the White House and NATO to consider a temporary halt of 48 hours or so to the air campaign against Yugoslavia in order to improve the environment for diplomatic discussions. He expressed regret today that such a pause in the airstrikes had not been attempted. <snip>

"Contrary to some published reports of US and NATO public statements, which suggest that we intend to continue the airstrikes even against Serb forces who may be actually beginning to withdraw, I believe the U.S. and NATO should reiterate what we had been saying earlier--that NATO will not strike at Serbian troops who are actively pulling out of Kosovo. How can we expect the Serbs to withdraw their troops if we have made clear that we will bomb them on the way out unless they have agreed to a full withdrawal, and outlined a timetable for it? Is this seeming new emphasis on continuing the airstrikes even if the troops are withdrawing a change in emphasis, or tone, or is it a substantive change?" Wellstone asked.

http://www.commondreams.org/pressreleases/may99/051399i.htm
------


Excerpt from Clinton Is The WorId's Leading Active War Criminal
Clinton's crimes, after just seven years in office, are competitive with Suharto's
by Edward S. Herman
Z magazine , December 1999 Third World Traveler one of the MOST progressive and alternate web-sites we have

Clinton: Postmodern War Criminality

This brings us to Bill Clinton, who has gone beyond the Bush record of criminality, and has brought to the commission of war crimes a new eclectic reach and postmodern style. A skilled public relations person, he has refined the rhetoric of humanistic and ethical concern and can apologize with seeming great sincerity for our earlier regrettable sponsorship and support of mass murder in Guatemala while carrying out similar or even more vicious policies in Colombia and Iraq at the same moment.

<snip>

Clinton's crimes range from ad hoc bombings to boycotts and sanctions designed to starve into submission, to support of ethnic cleansing in brutal counterinsurgency warfare, and to aggression and devastation by bombing designed to return rogues to the stone age and keep them there.

On June 26, 1993, Clinton bombed Baghdad in retaliation for an alleged but unproven Iraq plot to assassinate former President George Bush. Eight Iraqi civilians, including the distinguished Iraqi artist Layla al-Attar were killed in the raid, and 12 more were wounded. This kind of unilateral action in response to an unproven charge is a violation of international law. The legal excuse given by U.S. officials, which they relied on in justification of the bombing of Libya in 1986, is the right to self defense under Article 51 of the UN Charter. But that Article requires that the response be to an immediate threat to the retaliating party, clearly not the case, and therefore a legal fraud. This was a crime-petty by the usual U.S. standard-but still a crime. And it had the further repellent feature that it was done almost surely for purely internal political reasons-to show Clinton's toughness, despite his Vietnam War record, and to countervail right-wing attacks on his lack of militancy.

<snip>

The most monumental of Clinton's war crimes, however, has been his policy of sanctions on Iraq, supplemented by the maintenance of intense satellite surveillance and regular bombing attacks that have often resulted in civilian casualties. UNICEF reports that in 1999 more than 1 million Iraqi children under 5 were suffering from chronic malnutrition, and some 4,000-5,000 children are dying per month beyond normal death rates from the combination of malnutrition and disease. Death from disease was greatly increased by the shortage of potable water and medicines, that has led to a 20-fold increase in malaria (among other ailments). This vicious sanctions system, causing a creeping extermination of a people, has already caused more than a million excess deaths, and it is claimed by John and Karl Mueller that Clinton's "sanctions of mass destruction" have caused "the deaths of more people in Iraq than have been slain by all so-called weapons of mass destruction throughout all history" (Foreign Affairs, May/June 1999). U.S. mainstream reporters, who have so eagerly followed the distress of the Kosovo Albanians, somehow never get to Iraq for pictures of the thousands of malnourished children.
One of the notable features of the NATO-U. S. war against Yugoslavia was the gradual extension of targeting to civilian infrastructure and civilian facilities-therefore civilians who would be in houses, hospitals, schools, trains, factories, power stations, and broadcasting facilities. Two months after the war was over, the BBC "revealed" that the attack on Yugoslav television on April 23 was part of an escalation of NATO bombing whereby the target list was extended to non-military objectives; NATO was "taking off the gloves." According to Yugoslav authorities, 60 percent of NATO targets were civilian, including 33 hospitals and 344 schools, as well as 144 major industrial plants and a large petro-chemical plant whose bombing caused a pollution catastrophe. John Pilger noted that the list of civilian targets included "housing estates, hotels, libraries, youth centres, theatres, museums, churches and 14th century monasteries on the World Heritage list. Farms have been bombed and their crops set afire."

<snip>

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/International_War_Crimes/ClintonWarCriminal_Herman.html


THIRD WORLD TRAVELER puts up magazine articles and book excerpts
that offer an alternative view to the corporate media about the state of democracy in America, and about the impact of the policies of the United States' government, transnational corporations, international trade and financial institutions, and the corporate media, on war and peace, democracy, civil liberties, free speech, human rights, and social and economic justice, in the Third World, and in the United States.
THIRD WORLD TRAVELER also provides information and links to aid international travelers.


---

Clinton gave several excuses for bombing Iraq on the eve of the impeachment vote, especially the (bogus, but unquestioned) claim that Iraq had stopped cooperating with UNSCOM inspectors. In reality, Iraq’s cooperation with UNSCOM inspectors had actually been increasing, despite U.S. attempts to provoke a confrontation. However, knowing the impeachment schedule, Clinton had directed UNSCOM chief Richard Butler to write a report that Iraq was not cooperating. Even Scott Ritter, the former chief UNSCOM weapons inspector who quit because he thought the weapons inspectors were not tough enough, said that the White House had been on the phone with UNSCOM "shaping" the report to make sure it would justify bombing Iraq during the impeachment trial.

Clinton actually used the Muslim holy month of Ramadan as an excuse for the timing of the bombing. This may have fooled the American media, but didn't fool Muslims, as Clinton continued the bombing even after Ramadan had started (but halted the bombing as soon as the impeachment vote ended).

Fact: the UNSCOM inspectors were not kicked out of Iraq in December 1998 by Saddam -- President Clinton had UNSCOM chief Richard Butler pull out the UN inspectors so he could bomb. United Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan was understandably angry that Clinton ordered out not just the U.S. inspectors, but all United Nations inspectors (which he had no authority to do).

Fact: ever since Bill Clinton ordered the UNSCOM inspectors out of Iraq so he could bomb (the day before the impeachment vote), there have been no UN weapons inspectors in Iraq. So when Clinton said (as soon as the impeachment vote ended), "We have achieved our objectives," was one of those objectives to permanently remove weapons inspectors from Iraq?

Fact: days before the UNSCOM report came out, Clinton was in Israel, already telling Prime Minister Netanyahu that he was expecting a negative UNSCOM report, and that he would soon be bombing Iraq. Clinton knew the contents ahead of time because he was "shaping" that report.

Fact: because of Clinton's December 1998 bombing, Iraq began challenging the U.S. and British "no-fly zones," which they had not been doing before. The risk to U.S. pilots is negligible (no U.S. plane has ever been hit), but it has given the U.S. and Britain an excuse for nearly daily bombing of Iraq (not just radar sites, but cities, towns, shepherd's camps, etc.). Since December 1998, this illegal bombing has killed about two hundred Iraqis, including shepherds with their flocks, families in their houses, and small children, and injured many more. It helps to put faces on the victims. I saw a photo of a cute, smiling little girl named Isra, from the Abu-Khasib neighborhood of Basra, who lost her right arm when a U.S. IGM-130 missile hit her neighborhood at 10:10 AM, January 25, 1999 (for a picture of her, see http://www.vitw.org/airwar.html).

http://www.ornery.org/essays/2001-01-26-1.html

----

(Excerpt)

Maybe Americans don't care about the hundreds of Iraqis Clinton killed during the impeachment trial bombings of Iraq, and the scores of Iraqi civilians (and sheep) killed during the almost daily bombings of Iraq in the two years since then. Most Americans, incredibly enough, don't even know we're still at war, that we've been bombing Iraq every other day for the last two years!


Okay, for the sake of argument, say we can forgive Clinton for killing a few hundred or thousand Iraqis with bombs.

Bombs are merciful compared to what Clinton has done to the innocent children of Iraq, the most vulnerable of all, by maintaining ten years of the harshest sanctions in the history of mankind, begun on August 6, 1990, and kept in place at the insistence of the United States. On May 12, 1996, television’s "Sixty Minutes" interviewed Madeleine Albright (then U.S. ambassador to the UN, now Secretary of State). Leslie Stahl asked Albright, "We have heard half a million children have died . That's more children than died in Hiroshima. Is the price worth it?"

Albright replied, "I think this is a very hard choice. But the price, we think, is worth it."

I believe there is a special place in hell reserved for Madeleine Albright.

Yes, even four and a half years ago, 500,000 Iraqi children had already died as a direct result of economic sanctions. Over one million Iraqi civilians have died from the sanctions, mostly children under age five. Those are not Iraqi figures -- those figures come from Unicef, the World Health Organization, the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), the UN’s Department of Humanitarian Affairs, and other international sources. The "oil-for-food" program is so ineffectual that two consecutive UN directors of that program (Denis Haliday and Hans Von Sponeck) resigned, out of protest that they were presiding over a humanitarian disaster which can only be called genocide. They were UN Assistant Secretaries General, the highest ranking UN personnel ever to resign for reasons of conscience. Now Denis Haliday and Hans Von Sponeck are touring America and other countries, pleading for an end to the sanctions on Iraq.

Embargoes during peacetime are tough enough, but after a devastating war, they are disastrous. During the Gulf War, U.S. forces deliberately targeted Iraqi water treatment plants, dams, and electric generating facilities (in violation of the Geneva Convention), later admitting they did it in order to cause disease (which was biological warfare by the United States). Iraq has not been allowed to rebuild its water treatment plants since then. Chlorine, and water chlorinators, are prohibited under sanctions. Disease is at epidemic levels, especially among babies and children under five. Nobel Peace prize winners have visited Iraq and described the sanctions as genocide. Iraqi children are dying from starvation, malnutrition, tainted water, lack of basic medicines, and diseases that were once rare but now epidemic.

http://www.ornery.org/essays/2001-01-26-1.html




"Our leaders are cruel because only those willing to be inordinately cruel and remorseless can hold positions of leadership in the foreign policy establishment ... People capable of expressing a full human measure of compassion and empathy toward faraway powerless strangers ... do not become president of the United States, or vice president, or secretary of state, or national security adviser or secretary of Defense. Nor do they want to."
William Blum

Much more stuff here: http://www.commondreams.org/kosovo/moreviews.htm
http://www.commondreams.org/kosovo/new.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Friar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. OMG! It IS all Clinton's fault!
You've convinced me. I repent. Not.

I agree with Micheal Moore that Clinton was the best Republican President but I know he was also one of the best Presidents ever regardless of his misteps (FCC deregulation, NAFTA and a few others). At least he was certainly no fascist which is the only accurate description of the BFEE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #45
58. lol Friar. Not trying to get you to repent
Edited on Mon Jul-14-03 01:48 PM by Tinoire
I agree that Clinton was one of the best presidents the US EVER had and have dedicated the last year as well as the next few years of my life to do what I can to . Like I said, I was, am, one of Clinton's number one fans.

So no... I know you're being sarcastic but for the record, I have never said that it was all Clinton's fault, nor would I want to be on a Clinton bashing band-wagon. This is probably the first post I've ever made at DU that had even the slightest criticism of Clinton in it because overall, I think he did as fine a job as our system will allow and I greatly admire his political and personal skills. Had Clinton's hands not been tied, and were our system more Democratic, I believe he would have been an ASTOUNDING leader making ASTOUNDING contributions to world peace. He worked within a rotten system and did his best trying to better the country as a whole and please the corporations ne couldn't dismiss (Monsanto being a prime example).

So again, for the record- my hat is off to Clinton as a President and always has been. No single President will ever be perfect- I accept that but recognize a great leader when I see one. Leaders like Clinton don't come around very often!

Peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Friar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #58
85. Agreed tinoire
I have my own criticisms of Clinton that have nothing to do with Monica. Same with Carter and the Airline deregs. Boy, did Carter cave in on that!

Being a "liberal" politician doesn't mean you aren't a politician. I appreciate that. I think Clinton made a substantial contribution to world peace that the current administration has done a remarkable job in undoing though.

We do criticize Clinton. He definitely wasn't liberal enough for most of us (right, guys?) but he still kicked ass.

I wasn't being sarcastic, I was just being silly :silly:. I thought your post was well written and insightful. Sorry if my being an idiot gave you the idea I was dissing you. It's hard sometimes for the written word to convey our true thinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinoire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #85
114. Have no fears you funny poster!
Edited on Mon Jul-14-03 07:26 PM by Tinoire
By the way my first sentence was meant to say something along the lines of "I agree that Clinton was one of the best presidents the US EVER had and have dedicated the last year as well as the next few years of my life to do what I can to help get * OUT.

I have a couple of problems with Bill also- namely Gays in the Military (Don't ask, don't tell was a SAD JOKE worse than what they had before) and his handling of the Haitian Refugee issue (broken campaign promise to the Black Caucus and to Black Americans).

But a BRILLIANT politician he was and the name 'Slick Willie' well deserved! Better slick than stupid any day (you hear that Dubya?)!

I never thought you were dissing me! I've read too many of your posts to think that and appreciate your fun silliness. Your sarcasm came across loud & clear as did your real thoughts on the matter.

Peace

I'll take a BJ over an illegal, corrupt, immoral, world destabilizing, THIEVING war any day!

On edit: Whoops. That last statement doesn't work well coming from a girl! Peace and HAPPY BASTILLE DAY AMERICA!

HAPPY FRENCH INDEPENDENCE DAY DUBYA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #42
50. Lots of women and children and artists and pacifists died ...
Edited on Mon Jul-14-03 01:29 PM by dawg
when we firebombed the Germans and Japanese in WWII. Not to mention Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

War is an unpleasant thing that kills innocent people. If civilian targets were needlessly bombed in Serbia, then there should be accountability and reparations made. That does not, however, negate the fact that the Serbian government brought this upon themselves. Had they not been conducting ethnic cleansing, I don't think they would've been targeted by NATO. I think the articles that try to paint the U.S. as pursuing it's imperialistic interests in Kosovo are stretching it to say the least. I'm not aware of anything they have that we need.

Sava, if you read this, I apologize for thinking you were a disruptor. There may have been some American atrocities, and if so, they should be dealt with. But atrocities committed during an action do not make the action unjustified.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #50
53. "Atrocities committed during an action do not make the action unjustified"
I disagree. The action is unjustified if less destructive viable options were rejected. See above.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
48. Clinton actually did NOT lie, not even about sex. Thanks for this
Edited on Mon Jul-14-03 01:38 PM by robbedvoter
It's time we learn to debate without using lame-ass lines like: "granted" or "to be fair" - especially when we deal with bullies and the things we are granting are nothing but old bully lies.
No more granting nothing. Clinton never lied, unlike this bunch who NEVER TOLD THE TRUTH. About anything - starting with the election and going through every crime they committed against other countries, freedom, environment and the economy.
As for the "progressives" who use the wingnut words "disgrace" and such - they only prove my point that in the extreme, left and right are indistinguishable. Clinton moved this country forward - with is unforgivable in the extremist area. I had navigated anti-Clinton sites that made my head spin: Chomsky+Nader+ Starr+Scaiffe - it was impossible to figure out which extreme it belonged to.. The Nation, Mother Jones invented the Mena - cocaine traffic - then the VRWC ate it up. Just an example.They had a good ol' time together then, and the collaboration still continues - but I don't have the stomach to hunt for it.
As for people dying - there were NO US CASUALTIES in the Kosovo humanitarian intervention. Sorry if Milosevic's followers disagreed, these are sometimes necessary. An honorable POTUS would send troops in Liberia - the population needs it and wants it - so BFEE won't go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Friar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #48
51. Clinton did lie about Monica
which is, of course, totally irrelevent. I've challenge many a rightwingnut to give me an example, just one, of any lie other than Monica. I've yet to hear an adequate reply to that query.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #51
57. Nope, he didn't.


But if this is your vicarious way of enjoying it, can't deprive you of it, can I?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sava Donating Member (158 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #57
76. sorry buddy... when you do something, then say you didn't, that's a lie
just admit it... living in denial isn't healthy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #76
87. I am not Milosevic, therefore NOT your buddy.
When you do one thing, than say you didn't do another, it ain't a lie. It seems to take waaay to much of your life this BJ - I have a normal life to lead so, I'll let you to your fixations.

I
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sava Donating Member (158 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #87
106. enjoy your stay in Wonderland!
Give me a buzz if you ever decide to join us here in the real world. BTW, I never commented on Milosevic in any of my posts. So please, don't try to put words in my mouth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Friar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #57
90. oh, c'mon
He did lie about Monica. So what? As I've said before, he was the most honest President in history. I love the guy, fer gawd's sake. I also have the secret hots for Hillary but don't tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #48
56. oh man
you see...Dems will NEVER get the credibility they seek if you people keep claiming that Clinton didn't lie.

That will NEVER get Anyone But Bush elected, and you should be ashamed for even SUGGESTING it.

BILL CLINTON IS A LIAR! GEORGE BUSH IS A LIAR!!

LLLLLIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #56
59. Credibility? To whom? Aliens? People who pretend they
are above all others because they remove themselves from the process and pee on everyone? Is that a virtue? I don't want you to believe me. You are an outsider kibbitzing on life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #56
61. Everyone is a liar, Terwilliger
But some people lie more often than others, and some people's lies are more hurtful and self-protective than others.

Clinton did not lie nearly as much as the right wing and Sam Smith lefties claim he did. And he doesn't come anywhere near the maliciousness and prolificacy of Bush's mendacity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RememberTheCoup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #56
64. see post #32
What in that post is incorrect? Or are you talking about something else?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #56
69. Yes you are right
the Democratic slogan for 2004 should be "Bush Lied, just like Clinton". Keep doing the good work of Republicans there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #56
79. and we should accept your assertion because of ...
what?

Get to the nitty gritty and put your money where your mouth is... what lies did Clinton tell? Provide the date, the venue and what evidence makes them a lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #79
98. I DID NOT HAVE SEX WITH THAT WOMAN
That is the lie. PLEASE Pepperbelly...I was always able to give you more credit than THIS!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #56
122. And Ralph Naders a Fucking liar... Now were even Greenie!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #122
129. "Now we're even Greenie!"??
That's pretty immature even for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terwilliger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
55. put your helmet on
We'd better use their hatred of Clinton against them and RIGHT NOW or Bush will take over the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #55
60. Using hatred - is that people who don't care about the truth do?
Spoken like a campaign strategist - "so what if it is a lie - it could benefit us". Wow! Having no committment is realli good for you - you can take this to ANY campaign, bush, dem - and make money and still feel above us all!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
67. "DU'ers" ? - anyone can post on DU
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #67
86. Excellent point - as the thread proves.
People who intend to help bush's reselection next year (directly or indirectly) are itching to pick up the entire anti-Clinton rhetoric (only some of them are doing it for a "noble" reason, them being above partizan politics - destroy the Earth in the name of purity of ideals) No one who actually wants bush out is jumping on the "disgrace" bandwagon - it's like a litmus test.
"Use their hatred against them" - is code for "We'll tell the truth about EVERYONE (except ourselves - being so superior to you all earthlings - there's no difference between parties, don't vote, stay home and bitch - maybe you'll get to be superior like us"
Grow up already! Read Conason, Brock, Blumenthal - get informed about who lied and who did not and stop making these ambiguous statements. Stop trying to deflect the energy on this board from its true target: bush. I can use your hatreds against yourselves as well - easier, since you hate just about everything and everybody..

"Participate joyfully in the sorrows of the world" Joseph Campbell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pepperbelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
80. 100% right, Brother Trumad ..
the number of DUers who accept right wing CRAP as the gospel makes me sick. And the place is LOUSEY with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Friar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #80
93. wait a minute
We don't accept all the VRWC crap but mostly we do consider other opinions. Our bad. It's just unfortunate that those other opinions tend to be fallacious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeachBuckeye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
83. Even if your judgement cannot be trusted concerning football,
I wholeheartedly agree with you on this issue. History is going to be VERY kind to Bill Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Friar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #83
95. As well it should.
Clinton is one of the greatest men of the 20th century and history will report that, if it's honest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ithinkmyliverhurts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
100. In praise of the word "Clintonian."
First, what I'm about to say has nothing to do with whether I like Clinton, Gore, Bush, or any president. Second, I realize that the original post is about someone saying Bush is just like Clinton, so if I go slightly off topic, I'm conscious of this. To me, "Clintonian" means frustrating the hell out of people when you stick to the precise words being used. That's why "it depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is" was so damned astute. Tense of the verb meant everything as to whether or not he was telling the truth. He was simply seeking clarification. If "is" means what "is" means (present tense), then his statement was accurate. If "is" means "was," "has been," "had been," "will have been," etc., then his answer would have been inaccurate. It's a great talking point for the right, but Clinton didn't lie here. But look at what one has to go through to make this point.

That being said, that's why you see the administration backpeddaling on their admission that the SOTU address (you know, the 16 words)was false. They now wish they hadn't admitted it and had played the exact word game (and even then, it's tough because of the next 7 or 8 words that follow the 16 words--chimpy used the present tense when he shouldn't have). Al Gore's use of "no controlling legal authority," I think, is far, far weaker rhetorically than Clinton's "is" explanation (not to say Gore was guilty of anything; his choice of words was just bad).

"Clintonian" does not mean lying, telling half-truths, evading questions, or anything negative. It simply means sticking to what was said exactly. The press didn't let Clinton get away with it, and they sure as hell shouldn't let chimpy get away with it. Finally, to completely cover my ass here, if one makes the case that Bush's exact statement is a lie, then he's not Clintonian; he's a liar (just like Clinton was a liar, and completely unClintonian--ahh, perhaps Reaganesque-- when he said to the camera something about "that woman").
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #100
115. I agree with most of what you said.
I heard today on CNN how the moderator said if the Bush people were "clintonesque". Your explanation is all fine and good but if the media continues to use that word in the future (and they more than likely will), your explanation of it is lost. Everyone hearing it will assume Clinton is the first president ever to evade the truth or lie.

So I take offense to the media comparing Bush to Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ithinkmyliverhurts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #115
128. Yes, I agree.
My definition of "Clintonian" is rather specific (though used by the media often). I too take offense to the media comparing Clinton to Bush. Clinton's asshair was smarter than chimpy. And his weenie is far less dangerous to the world.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
104. NAFTA and Kosovo are my problems with him
I like the guy ok domestically but Kosovo was very complicated I here and bombing those civilians didnt help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #104
119. That's a quick gloss, isn't it?
top of my head, welfare reform, GATT, World bank, Marc Rich, could do more but there is a little bit of Alice in Wonderland it seems
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #119
130. I like the guy ok
but theres a lot he didnt do that would had me happy. I just think I have more love for Jimmy Carter than Bill Clinton do I like Bill yes I do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Isome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
111. For crying outside...
Before I know it, I'll be reading posts about the Clintons having crack pipes and condoms on their Christmas tree.

A lie about a man's sex life is inconsequential because it's none of my business anyway, nor anyone else's. Lies about committing hundreds of thousands of U.S. troops to fight a war or the true impact of tax cuts, is the country's business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
121. Clinton lied about policy, not just sex
He set up the Northwest Forest Plan and convinced a lot of conservation groups to go along with his compromises- and then turned around and signed the Salvage Rider (the Logging Without Laws Act). That was a stab in the back that few around here have forgotten. To his credit, he did later apologize about it- after the damage was done.

He also claimed to have "his veto pen ready" if the Telecommunications Bill passed. Months later, he signed the Bill to much "fanfare," effectively destroying local radio. Now he has the gall to complain about the media consolodation that he furthered and which was sheparded through by HIS FCC appointee, Michael Powell.

Sorry. We all know that Bush is a pathological liar, but Clinton lied plenty too. Whats fair for the goose is fair for the gander.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #121
124. Obviously the point was lost with you er...Monica Knuckleheads!
And as usual we've got the Green with Envy, Greenies who are pissed that they can't even get Grandpa Herman or Basketball Ralph elected to the office of Dog Catcher!

OH well... The amount of knuckleheads on DU amount to uhhhh 2 percent... I can live with that amount of idiocy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #124
125. Just know the truth when I see it, trumad
Edited on Mon Jul-14-03 08:18 PM by depakote_kid
If that makes me a Knucklehead in your mind, oh well...

And who said anything about Nader? I simply pointed out lies... lies that I'd prefer to forget but am reminded of every time I turn on the radio or see vast acres of clearcut.

I would hope that we both agree that this country could use a President who didn't lie about important policies, period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #125
126. No...what this country could use is more informed citizens
who care more about the important stuff instead of Oral Sex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #126
127. On that we completely agree
and there's nothing like losing a job or a pension to get people informed and caring about the important stuff. The stupid Lewinski thing means little when you're in line at the food bank....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackSwift Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
123. Bullshit. Fellatio isn't sex.
Even by Republican standards, it isn't a lie. Clinton never had sexual intercourse with Monica Lewinsky. I won't question that he tried to mislead us about something that was not our business, but he did not have sex with that woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
131. Mods I know we mostly like here like Clinton but was it right to ban Sava
Edited on Mon Jul-14-03 11:01 PM by JohnKleeb
My family or at least part of it is from that region as is Sava and IluvChicago's. I dont know what Sava thinks but me and Chicago know Slobadon Milosevic was terrible. We just didnt think it was right to bomb the living hell out of that country for that. Maybe I disagree with Sava about the blowjob he screwed up in my opinion. I like Clinton pretty much but there is a lot he has done that I dont like. I dont condone what happened in Bosnia and stuff but I didnt see the need to bomb the hell out of that country. Although I am pleased we lost no lives there are plenty of innocent Serbs who did not like Mr. Milosevic who did perish. Just realize that not every DUer will like Clinton. The other day I met one who did not share my admiration for the Kennedies. Please DU we can not become like Free Republic and ban because of disagreements I read no where when I signed up that I must like Bill Clinton. So all who read this please realize that he was not a disruptor. I know you may have disagreed with him about Clinton but many of us disagree about Nader and other things. I am sorry if I offended anyone but I didnt see the need to ban him and I didnt see what he meant on Clinton lying about the blowjob but just because the guy doesnt like Clinton does not make him a republican. Please and thank you. Thanks again to all who read this. Just dont flame me because I am not the biggest Clinton fan in the world either.
Before you call him a right winger. "Clinton is better than Bush, but no angel." I think we can agree on that Clinton wasnt exactly a dove. I just didnt see the need to ban him we all dont love Bill Clinton. Sorry guys but I disagree with this ruling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iluvchicago86 Donating Member (422 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #131
132. I agree...
Sava was no disruptor. Just because he did not hold positive opinions about Clinton and dared to critisize was no reason to silence his thoughts. I perceived him to be quite brave in saying what he thought. And i must say i agree with his views on clinton. Does that make me a freeper repug hating machine. NO. We liberals, as a whole, have that fantastic power of voice that just grows and grows in order to perform justice and to do what is right ....but it is quite sad when we start to silence each other.


Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phatfish Donating Member (403 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 02:22 AM
Response to Reply #131
136. sava was banned???
why was he banned? Because he didn't hold Clinton up on some idolic pedistal. If he was, I see nothing in this thread that would rise to such a punishment. Hell, I agreed with him on many points (I don't know as much about Kosovo as some of you, so I'll stay out of that area).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #136
141. click his profile
You'll see a tombstone. Maybe I explained my facts wrong about Kosovo but there were definely mistakes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 03:20 AM
Response to Reply #131
138. If you disagreed with the decision John then send admin a note
Edited on Tue Jul-15-03 03:21 AM by nothingshocksmeanymo
I don't know what Sava's thing was but it won't get worked out here. Second, a person never gets banned for one post but usually a series of events.

Finally, I too had disagreements with Clinton but when someone argues his sex life and Kosovo in the same sentence, then something's up.

As far as the war in Kosovo, it was a war that was going to happen regardless of our involvement with terrible casualties and abuses on both sides. The difference being it was planned and from a military and logistical point planned responsibly. It occurred approximately 70 days in the air and 4 days on the ground. We did NOT go there unilaterally and NO US TROOPS were lost after the campaign was declared ended so..again..no true comparison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #138
140. I disagreed with him about the sex life comment
but he clearly was a progressive. Yeah we didnt go in there uniterally and lives wre lost. It was a series of events and I disagreed with him about impeaching Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WINEWOMAN7 Donating Member (100 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-14-03 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
133. enough of Clintonian Crap
I'm tired of hearing how Clinton lied. We all lie about our personal life, as we should. It's nobody's business. This is a traditional Republican mantra, so why has it flipflopped the last 3 years during the Bush administration. Could it be that they aren't traditional Republicans but right wing nuts?

Bush and his administration lied about going to war with Iraq and killing thousands of Iraqies and hundreds of our military based on their lies. They made up their mind to go to war and they didn't care how many people died. All they cared about is acquiring oil. As far as I'm concerned this is Treason and worthy of impeachment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
135. Well I gotta admit after reading through this thread and clicking
here and there.

I normally hate threads like this but they do make for nice flypaper...:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 06:33 AM
Response to Reply #135
139. Flypaper indeed...
Look...I started this thread because of a continued pattern by the media and others who use the "Clintonian" metaphor when it comes to political lying. It baffles me that this right wing created tag is used by folks on the left. Why not Reaganeske? or Nixontonian?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-15-03 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #139
142. Its ok
Sorry about what happened last night its just that we cant expect everyone to revere Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC