Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Opens China Energy Office - expect Unocal to be sold, folks.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-05 08:08 AM
Original message
U.S. Opens China Energy Office - expect Unocal to be sold, folks.
http://www.ens-newswire.com/ens/jul2005/2005-07-01-03.asp

WASHINGTON, DC, July 1, 2005 (ENS) - Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman Thursday announced the establishment of a Department of Energy (DOE) office in Beijing, China. The new office will support DOE’s cooperative efforts with China on energy and nuclear security issues, the secretary said.

The announcement of DOE’s new Beijing office was made in conjunction with the first meeting of the U.S.-China Energy Policy Dialogue held in Washington also on Thursday.

"The United States and China have a constructive relationship on a variety of issues, including energy security and nuclear security," Bodman said.


Article has more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-05 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. As a wise man once said...
"Bow down before the one you serve,
You're going to get what you deserve."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
givemebackmycountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-05 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. And why not?
Name ONE FREAKIN' thing in this country that isn't for sale?
INCLUDING the American people.

Good post and good catch Toad.

I think this confirms the writing is on the wall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-05 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Despicable, isn't it?
Other articles I've been browsing (mostly Asia Times pablum) are biased pro-sale too. :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-05 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. Once China takes formal control of the US
will we stop murdering people in other countries? I hope so...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
natrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-05 08:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. as long as we don't all have to wear that grey uniform
i'd go fuckin nuts without a good floral pattern now and then
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-05 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Will ther be a Cultural Revolution? I love when that happens.
Edited on Fri Jul-01-05 09:35 AM by Neshanic
The "ChinaMart Running Dog" hour. A fun filled hour of how giving your money, jobs, and energy companies to China is a good thing!

"Freeper Reality Surprise" when a family has a Chinese Communist family move in with them, and then tell them they own the mortgage. Hilarity ensues.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-05 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. The Bush family's connections to Unacol

date back to the '80's, when Bush associate Nicholas Brady helped defend the firm from a takeover attempt by Mesa Petroleum. http://www.thedubyareport.com/iraq2.html (March of the Neocons)

The Bush Justice Dept., early in his first term, filed a friend of the court brief opposing a lawsuit against Unacol that alleged abuses on behalf of an indigenous community, claiming among other things, that the suit was a "threat to national security."


The Clinton administration and the Pakistani Inter Services Agency had developed a strategy in which the Taliban would provide 'stability' in managing the tribal rivalries that had prevented the pipeline from proceeding without sabotage. http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2002/01/6919.shtml

In 1998 the New York Times reported that, ". . . Unocal opened offices in Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Pakistan and Turkmenistan. To help it sell the pipeline project to the many governments involved, Unocal hired senior United States diplomats like the former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger.

Problems began with the Taliban's capture of the Afghan capital, Kabul, in September 1996. Unocal initially took a positive view of the movement's triumph."

In October 1997, Zalmay Khalilzad, and Unocal executive Marty Miller testified before a Senate Foreign Relations subcommittee, touting the "economic benefits that a set of pipelines from Central Asia can bring to the Afghan people if it is able to pass through the country." http://www.thedubyareport.com/iraq2.html

Khalilzad met with Taliban representatives in 1997 in Houston during the pipeline negotiations. He wrote in a Washington Post article that, "The Taliban does not practice the anti-U.S. style of Muslim fundamentalism practiced by Iran. We should be willing to offer recognition and humanitarian assistance and to promote international economic reconstruction. It is time for the United States to 'reengage' the Taliban."

He has changed his view of the Taliban a great deal since that statement, especially in the wake of the terrorist bombings of 9-11. In 1984, Khalilzad joined the State Department on a one-year fellowship. His background and language skills were enough to enable his placement in a permanent position on the State Department's Policy Planning Council.

He worked at the State Dept. under Paul Wolfowitz, who served as director of policy planning in the Reagan administration. Later Khalilzad worked on issues related to the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan and the Iran-Iraq war.

Khalilzad had signed Feith's "open letter" to President Clinton in 1998, calling for "a determined program to change the regime in Baghdad." The letter echoed policy proposals prepared by Perle and Feith two years earlier, for Israel's Binyamin Netanyahu. Khalilzad was among the first Bush administration officials to speak publicly of "regime change" in Iraq.

After the 2000 election, Khalilzad, led the Bush-Cheney transition team for the Defense Department, and served as an advisor to Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld.

Khalilzad, who was then gifted with a permanent position on the State Department's Policy Planning Council right in the midst of the mujahedeen's war against Soviet occupation, was appointed by our current president to the position of Special Envoy to Afghanistan.

Khalizad will have another opportunity to reverse or expound on whatever mistakes he made over there in the lead up to 9-11. It's hard to imagine that his leadership or counsel in Afghanistan's regard will resolve the conflict, or win the hearts and minds of any would-be conscripts or reformers.

Robert Oakley, U.S. ambassador to Pakistan in the 1980's was chaperone to the CIA support of the Afghan Mujahedeen (in which Osama bin Laden became a commander), later worked for Unacol. http://www.ceto.quantico.usmc.mil/bios/roakley.asp

The current president of Afghanistan, Hamid Karszi, hand-picked by this administration, was said to have been employed at one time as a consultant to Unacol. He denies it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-05 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Great post!
(Make it your own topic and I'll nominate it!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
givemebackmycountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-01-05 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. Can I be this guy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 21st 2024, 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC