Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

a piece of filth talks up reagan and blasts Kerry

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 04:49 PM
Original message
a piece of filth talks up reagan and blasts Kerry
http://www.therant.us/staff/cherry/liberals_honor_reagan.htm

I'd otherwise tell him to go enlist himself, but he makes a particular comment that - if true - gives us another reason to be glad he lost. (the way * is destroying things, never mind peak oil, and as the chronometer flies, I expect the US to be a full fledged police state within 6 months. Especially if * is confronted with the DSM. If they lied and cheated and fixed machines to win in 2004, you bet they're not going to let laws and civilization take them out. )

John Kerry decided to take a week off from campaigning to honor the death of President Ronald Reagan. For some reason I find it fitting that he chooses to pay homage to our greatest President by duplicating the same amount of action he displayed during the Reagan era. Well, if you include that time in 1985 when Kerry accused Reagan of “funding terrorism” and then met with Daniel Ortega, leader of the Soviet backed Sandanista regime, then you can say Kerry only did nothing when it came to helping Reagan win the cold war. He was rather vigorous and energetic when it came to supporting our communist foes and subverting the Commander and Chief on every level. These are not things he, nor any other liberal, will remind you of when they speak of Reagan now.

Why would anybody pay homage to a jerk who helped terrorists, amongst everything else on Reagan's list of evil?

Anyway, the aforementioned link has more but it will quickly induce nausea. For example, is how liberals are blamed for the oil crisis:

Liberal dealings with the Middle East had resulted in long gas lines at the pumps and a hostage situation in Iran that turned the United States into an international laughing stock. I have never grown peanuts so I can’t say for sure how appeasement works with a rampaging hoard of red ants, but foreign policy based on containing your enemy instead of confronting them was a absolute failure in the days of Carter. The United States was humbled and humiliated on the world stage. Then morning came.

What is this fucking lunatic on anyway? Anybody with a functioning brain cell knows the GOP has always been the Greedy Oil Polluters (GOP). (indeed, the paragraph about liberals and middle east was haphazardly slopped in with some other rubbish about Carter and the military. Note to writer: If you're a professional (I'm not and I don't get paid for doing so, so what's your excuse?) you need to keep one paragraph to one topic.

Also, after some pap about liberals not being honest and how we should have simply acknowledged his death and let them have their party (for once he's right, we should have ignored the reagan filth or made a mention of his evildoings), he mentions this:

They fear the long shadow of Ronald Reagan as much in death as they did in life. President Reagan is universally loved. Being on the wrong side of his legacy, especially in a time of mourning for the former President, would be political death.

Well, the fact he's universally loved is not true. And if the people prefer to cherish a lie than to seek out the truth, well that means America is DEAD. And killed in a far more heinous way than the victims of the weapons he illegally sold...

Another paragraph:

As they heap praise on Ronald Reagan don’t forget the words they once used to describe him; Doddering, stupid, cowboy, dangerous. Think about these words as they speak of the Reagan days and their admiration of him. These are the same words they now use to describe our current President.

Well, he's right. What the fuck is ANYBODY doing praising that crapforbrains anyway? And will our bought'n'paid for Dems praise * in 20 years?

And then he has the nerve to say this bit of a joke:

Liberals spent the last 4 years attacking and attempting to subvert the actions of President Bush. Many of them called him stupid, yet he presided over an economy that survived the Clinton recession, 9/11 and became one of the fastest growing economies in American history. Others looked at his foreign policy and sarcastically referred to the man as a cowboy.

Clinton recession? What's that? While it may have started JUST BEFORE he left office, it didn't get better for the rest of us once Pretzeldent Shrimpyballs* got in. It's worse now and shrimpyballs has even said that he supports outsourcing. I'm amazed the economy hasn't crashed yet. But with the number of 'for sale' and 'for rent' signs going up, and all of the new upper-middle-class gated housing districts whose managers get to cash in on more foreclosures... it's not going to be up for much longer. Having Greensnot around doesn't help either.

9/11 was allowed to happen too. We were warned by a lot people... the signs were there. On 9/11 itself, the fact Pretzeldent sat there for another 6 minutes before doing anything doesn't give many the belief he was concerned. Indeed, 6 months to the day he said he'd stop at nothing to get Osama, he comes out saying how Osama didn't concern him. :wtf: That alone deserved one hell of an investigation. Never mind the recent scare on May 11 that had everybody rolling out of congress, yet pretzeldent remained blissfully unaware, biking along us usual path. Why'd nobody inform him what had happened? He's supposed to be the President. Supposed to be in charge. (of course, 5 years of what is hardly leadership of any kind, I'm not surprised...)

Many of them, including John Kerry said that the war on terror could not be won and that Bush was a fool to even try. Kerry himself, in word and action, expressed his desire to appease the terrorists and simply live with them. In other words, the same strategy he supported in the Cold War. If there can be an heir to the Reagan legacy should it be the optimistic Kerry or the other guy the liberals sarcastically refer to as a cowboy?

Well, a year (minus one day) later. The war ain't won. It's far worse. Kerry isn't to blame for that. Maybe the guy who said no American lives would be lost in Iraq might be to blame? He led us there with lies; this "Downing Street Memo" being the first solid piece of evidence to corroborate enough circumstantial evidence to keep that elephant dropping his dung inside of his very special zoo for life.


Oh, Brian Cherry, get a haircut. You look very unmanly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GetTheRightVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. I am so sick of these jerks, we should put Kerry back up for Pres
and make sure he gets in this time ............

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frederik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Moran's on parade
"He was rather vigorous and energetic when it came to supporting our communist foes and subverting the Commander and Chief on every level. These are not things he, nor any other liberal, will remind you of when they speak of Reagan now. "

Kerry merely spoke out against the treasonous and anti-American activities of the vice president and his cronies (Ollie North and the gang), conducted behind the back of the clueless movie star president.

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orwell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. And they shall run gladly...
Edited on Fri Jun-10-05 05:35 PM by orwell
to their own enslavement...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. We won?
So we won the war on terror? When? Why didn't I get the memo? Oh I'm still waiting for Bush to try. I guess we'll start trying after we get out of Iraq...



Many of them, including John Kerry said that the war on terror could not be won and that Bush was a fool to even try.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pretzel4gore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. they live in a state of denial...
subconsciously they know it...i'm convinced a kerry victory was not only expected, but hoped for by the majority of the busheviks: the rage and mindless anger they're displaying is just that... they 'crossed the rubicon' as mr ruppert put it, when bush 'won' and they did not want to cross any goddam rubicon....
one of the tricks the ratwing uses in debating or arguing or addressing the liberal left is to ignore anything they haven't prepared to talk about...the DSM will be thus; they'll then insist 'clinton thought there was wmd's'...or 'kerry supported bush all the way' etc....DS minutes be damned! So do the same. i do not ever read what pigmedia or bush pushers try to say; i just repeat 'the punk wasn't elected!' and 'the only terrorist is bush incorporated' and so on.....please do not let them control anything: like Mr Galloway did, always turn away from anything they're putting forth, and relentlessly attack the gopigs as liars, traitors, thieves and punks, cuz that's what they are..
>there's an excellent farce written by ted kazynski(?) of unibomber fame- yoou can find it at GNN where entire thing was posted yesterday. It concerns a ship whom the officers have decided, for some crazy unknown reason, to head north w/out stopping....the passengers and crew are angry about different things, each demands redress and the capt gives in and gives them a bit each, meanwhile a crewman with sense warns that if the ship isn't turned around, even if the passengers/crew must seize control of ship, they all die, but every time they get agitated, someone from the officers suggests they hold protest etc and every protest gains each one something, but the ship just continues until it get too far north, meets a storm and sinks...
thanks to BigOil at GNN:
http://www.guerrillanews.com/forum/thread.php?id=5850
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LightningFlash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. Kerry will never get in. They're afraid of him.
He's the true president, or president in "exile" thanks to ES&S and Diebold employees stealing the election. So they will never let him in, you're dealing with fascist extremists. Remember it, remember it, remember it, remember....Fight fire back with fire. :banghead: :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC