With all the stuff coming to light now--Downing Street, the provocative
bombing raids--plus what we already knew about the rush to war--I have a question that's troubling me somewhat this morning.
If 9-11 was a full-blown MIHOP, couldn't the Bushies have done a better job of pinning it on Saddam in the first place?
Of course they also wanted to go to war in Afghanistan (pipelines & all that) but you'd think they would have gone after the biggest marble if they were gonna do something as risky as 9-11.
the one "redeeming" feature of the banana republicans is that they're so freaking incompetent. the ONLY reason they get away with it is because they've got the media wrapped around their little finger.
their incompetence is what makes all this crap so obvious to us duers.
if they were actually GOOD at their covert crap, then even we probably would believe most of their lies.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.