Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Here's the Whipple Procedure survival rates for a Seattle Hospital.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
patcox2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 02:40 PM
Original message
Here's the Whipple Procedure survival rates for a Seattle Hospital.
Edited on Tue May-17-05 02:42 PM by patcox2
Interesting reading.

Pancreaticobiliary Cancer: Operative Mortality
In the April 11, 2002, issue of the New England Journal of Medicine, Dr. Birkmeyer and colleagues from Dartmouth University, Vermont, report their analysis of surgical mortality in the United States (N Engl J Med 2002 Apr 11;346(15):1128-37). Using information from the national Medicare claims database, they examined the relationship between hospital volume (total number of procedures performed per year) and mortality (death in hospital or within 30 days) for a variety of surgical procedures. The mortality rate for Whipple procedures (pancreaticoduodenectomy) at low-volume centers (16.3 percent) was much greater than the mortality rate at high-volume centers (3.8 percent). (Low volume = <1 case/year; high volume = >16 cases/year.)

With an annual case volume that exceeds 60 cases per year, operative mortality at Virginia Mason for Whipple procedures has been zero for more than a decade.

What was that about it having to be Johns Hopkins?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. This, like other threads on the subject, is eminently Lounge-worthy
I beseech the Admins and Mods to force this subject into the Lounge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EarlG ADMIN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-17-05 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. With respect
Clearly there is still plenty of confusion about the facts of this case. We understand that people have questions, unfortunately we don't think that any of us are going to be able to get any answers by continuing to discuss this right now.

In previous posts we have told people how we plan to resolve the situation with Andy, until then there's really very little we can do.

Locking this now. Thank you for your understanding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC