|
Edited on Mon Apr-04-05 03:53 AM by politicat
MDMA, before the DEA got involved, was used as a psychotropic as an empathogen, a drug to accelerate the client's ability to feel empathy and recognize and deal with negative emotional states (such as PTSD). It's not meth, it's not PCP. The research that had been done prior to DEA interference was that it did not cause or exacerbate disassociation, paranoia, or schizoid features. There was evidence that it could prove useful in treating paranoia and disassociation, as well as traumatic stress events and repression.
While chemically similar to methamphetamines, MDMA's physical structure works far differently on the brain, in a manner far closer to short-term antidepressants or anesthetics. However, the client retains lucidity and control over actions during use of the drug. MDMA does not produce hallucinations. Present time sense enhanced, and a in-depth communication is facilitated, but whether these are related or not is unclear. Eloquence and fluency in written and oral communication is usually seen; aphasia is very rare. Drug onset is acute and short lived and metabolism is rapid. MDMA half-life is 12 hours.
Repeated dosages have not been studied conclusively; earlier studies citing brain damage turned out to be tainted because the drug studied in rats was methamphetamine, not MDMA. Current street MDMA is frequently cut with meth or meth is sold as MDMA, so street versions are suspect. Nerve toxicity is noted in lab animals at equivalent dose of 175 mg; toxicity is reversible. (Standard doses run 100 mg oral).
Obviously, you feel that there is a risk to women from men being treated with MDMA for PTSD. As a psychotherapist and a military family member, let me assure you that the bigger risk to you and "every woman in America" is 100,000 untreated PTSD returnees, not not returnees being treated with anything that will help them cope with their experiences. With PTSD, any treatment is better than none.
Are you insinuating that returning personnel are potential rapists or batterers?
MDMA is not LSD. They are not the same, cannot be compared. One has therapeutic use, the other does not. I don't know what you're trying to hint at, but you're not being clear. So if you have any real evidence that you'd like to post links to, I think you should, or at least clarify what it is you're trying to say.
On Edit: Do I think MDMA is safe? Not safe enough to be an OTC drug. I think it should require a prescription as a psychotropic, and given my druthers, I'd prefer it to be a clinical use only drug, rather like an anesthetic. I don't think it should be prescribed the way Ambien is prescribed. However, anesthetics are "safe" when administered under controlled conditions. MDMA is, from all of the evidence so far gathered, equally safe in controlled settings.
|