bombing, after receiving intelligence reports from the CIA & other US government security agencies.
Clinton didn't worry about innocent civilians when he bombed an aspirin factory and killed the night watchman. No even after the fact. Free Republic
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/995781/postsIt is laughable that the report offers its most scorching criticism of the C.I.A. when the C.I.A. was simply doing what the White House and Pentagon wanted. Isn't that why Mr. Tenet was given the Medal of Freedom? (Freedom from facts.)
The hawks don't want to learn any lessons here. If they had to do it again, they'd do it the same way. The imaginary weapons and Osama link were just a marketing tool and shiny distraction, something to keep the public from crying while they went to war for reasons unrelated to any nuclear threat. NY TIMES Maureen Dowd
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/31/opinion/31dowd.html?hp&oref=login"The central conclusion is one which I share. America's intelligence community needs fundamental change," Bush said after receiving the unsparing critique.
"I don't think you can blame any one person, although the buck does stop at the top of every one of these agencies," Skelton said. "But quite honestly, the fault is spread out across all the agencies."<snip>
The president then strode from the room, leaving the two men behind to field questions on the report that criticized past performance — but didn't stop there.<snip>
The report said "The daily intelligence briefings given to you (Bush) before the Iraq war were flawed. Through attention-grabbing headlines and repetition of questionable data, these briefings overstated the case that Iraq was rebuilding its WMD programs."
"I believe it is essential that we hold both the intelligence agencies and senior policy-makers accountable for their actions," said, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev. Associated Press Writer
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2005/03/31/national/w050428S00.DTL