Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Still think Earth First and the ELF are a bunch of crazies?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 01:00 AM
Original message
Still think Earth First and the ELF are a bunch of crazies?
Edited on Thu Mar-17-05 01:01 AM by Radical Activist
Looks like our system of representative government has once again failed to reflect the interests and will of the people with this ANWR vote. Personally, I'm not sure a group of people conducting acts of civil disobedience and sabotage to stop the drilling in Alaska wouldn't be such a bad thing.

And for the benefit of the authorities who may read this message, I'm not about to travel to Alaska to do it, so don't worry about me. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jdj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. I never did.
I think they are doing what they believe is right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
illflem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. Destruction of property just makes people pissed
and discredits the agenda of groups like EF and ELF
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Losing the ANWR vote didn't make them pissed
Maybe we should worry more about doing something effective and less about pissing off polluters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tedzbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
17. Bombing Iraq just makes people pissed...
...and discredits the agenda of groups like the Republican Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
4. Aren't they the ones who claimed that beer is healthier than milk?
Or is that another group I'm thinking of?

Anywho, destroying private property is wrong. Unless that property is actually hurting a human being, it should not be destroyed.

But I am dismayed at the ANWR drilling. Oh well, I guess I should grab a bottle of whiskey and just watch it all come tumbling down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Maybe PETA
Ridicule in the media is one of the methods the CIA advocates for dismissing left wing ideologies they find to be dangerous.

Is destroying construction equipment and vehicles being used to destroy ANWR more immoral than destroying ANWR?

I'm sure the oil companies and government will be happy to see you doing nothing but drinking whiskey. People who do nothing to resist are in effect giving their consent to whatever nasty thing the government is doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. good point.
"Is destroying construction equipment and vehicles being used to destroy ANWR more immoral than destroying ANWR"?

speaking of PETA then speaking of "ridicule in the media as a CIA method" is redundant, but PETA also has the $$$ of the fur commission and cattlemans assoc. on their case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. wow
I thought everyone would tell me to not be so extremist.

I've never heard of PETA getting funding from those sources, but they do seem to have a lot of money as compared to other radical left wing organizations. hmmmm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. no, the anti-PETA movement is funded by these folks
that's why you always hear bullshit here about how PETA blew up MT. Everest, or burned down the Detroit zoo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Oh I see your point.
Makes sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. What they are going to do to ANWR is disgusting and immoral, but
will more immoral acts make things right? Or will they do anything except delay the project and foster resentment and odium towards ELF and their cause?

This won't gain us the support we need to stop this. We need people to be agianst it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Yes, it could stall the project
until public sentiment has changed or until after the next election. It could also raise the cost so high that it will discourage the oil companies from continuing the project. That would be a lot more effective that writing emails and signing online petitions, which don't appear to accomplish anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. Public sentiment doesn't need to be changed. Just the votes in
congress. Last poll I saw was something like 65% against drilling in ANWR.

Of course, in this democracy the will of the people counts for shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 02:28 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. That's what I thought
We already have public opinion on our side. The will of the people should be enforced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheModernTerrorist Donating Member (645 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. agreed
at this point there is little left in my moral bank that I wouldn't resolve in a similar fashion. I think Malcom X had it right... at least in part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
21. Oh, and personally
I would like to think that beer is healthier than milk. I drink more beer than milk anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 01:24 AM
Response to Original message
9. Yes
They're still crazy. If anything, their juvenile antics made it a sure bet that drilling would start in ANWR in retaliation. Great job, ELF. Great job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConsAreLiars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 01:36 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Peta and ELF caused drilling in ANWR?
Wow! That is the most bizarre "theory" I've seen on DU for a long time, and you have some pretty stiff competition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #9
18. Right. The oil companies are going to invest millions of dollars
in exploration, test holes, drilling, pipelines,

because they're pissed off at ELF.

I keep warning people that if they visit FR they need to get their shots, or risk being infected by Freeper logic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
12. Some kind of protesting is in order.
I would hesitate to send a large group of protesters physically there, who would be camping and probably doing quite a bit of damage by being there and camping on a pristine wilderness. I would rather do something from a distance in warning the companies away from drilling, something that would make it not worth their while to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. Interesting thought. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baconfoot Donating Member (653 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-05 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
22. Read the Federalist Papers. The representatives were NEVER meant to
merely reflect the wishes of the people. They are supposed to represent in the sense that a lawyer respresents her client, not in the sense that a realist painting represents its subject. The Articles of Confederation did not work.

There are methods for altering the system and making the system function more smoothly which are BUILT INTO the system, and which do not require violence.

I believe our system is basically a good one, which is having difficulty right now for various reasons (lack of transparency in the legislative deliberation process comes to mind... remember when debates on the floor actually persuaded people? I think this went out of style sometime in the 1920's or 30's.). When you use violence you are saying not only that the system isn't working (with which I agree) but that the only way to fix it is with violence. I disagree. I disrepectfully disagree.

This great democratic republic experiment of ours must fail if we are not committed to making it work, if we are not willing to sacrifice to make it work. Lincoln was right. Earth First and ELF are wrong.

END QUICK RANT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC