Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gannon, propaganda and the nervous right...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
LeftHander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 12:13 PM
Original message
Gannon, propaganda and the nervous right...
Well I am convinced.

Something really big is happening. The bloggers have opened the big can of worms. It is evident in the number of RW comments hitting my recent posts. Two items really have hit a nerve and it looks like the anonymous Bush propaganda operatives are making a effort to undermine the efforts of progressive blogs to reveal the truths behind the Bush "message machine".

Crimes have now surely been committed. A cover up is underway and it is only a matter of days before the whole mess blows up.

By simply capsulating the info gathered from DailyKOS, DU, AmericaBlog and posting them to my site I have quickly drawn fire from the RW. No doubt freepers have been instructed to disrupt in any way possible. As Gannon was one of them and now they have that taste in thier mouth of being decieved and some might channel that into destructive and criminal behavior.

As the blogs gather the data condencing it into easy to digest bits is the next step. Gannon ties up all what is wrong in the WHite House. The corruption, pandering, propaganda, lying and all the other crap that swept into the Washington when Bush rolled in.

The question is now that the White House is getting backed into a corner what will they do next?

We have seen in the last two days increased activitiy by Porter Goss and Mueller in cranking up the fear volume.

But when you ad to that the CNN photo's of the same nuke plant in three different countries it doesn't lend much credibility to the "intelligence" coming from Washington does it..?

Change is occuring. More and more people are recognizing that the MSM has failed. Failed? or were they wildly succesful? Succesful at convincing a nation to elect GW Bush for a second term, to start a war based on lies. I guess it depends on how you see yourself in our divided nation, on the right or the left.

Regardless of what the media does now the truth IS out (Thanks Will).

We are one nation, divided and people will have to choose are they with the corrupt, wicked leaders of this country or are they Americans.

Peace...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Shopaholic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. The funny thing is watching CNN try to cover their ass and not
cover this and blame it all on the "liberal bloggers" by framing it as a question of "have they gone too far?" These media whores better realize that we have become the media because they weren't willing to do their damn jobs. And they better have instant recall on what their role is really supposed to be or they are going to continue to see their ratings--and revenues fall as a result. And good enough for them, I say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zeke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Bully !!!
Hear! Hear! Bloggers are becoming the media.

You're right.

My God, Blitzer had Gannon on his show and asked him
virtually nothing, making me think the "interview" was
meant to resucitate Gannon, legitimize him, and
that Blitzer is on the WH payola payroll.

My God, if this was Clinton's WH with a gay, amle
whore with a fake name, from a fake news group
asking fake questions, etc ?!?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftHander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. Wolf Blitzer...
I saw that and it vwas amazing...

He either didn't care or is part of it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. You're right, they've had Howie Kurtz dancing around for days.
It's all the bloggers fault. What THEY KNOW, is that if they had half-assed done their jobs, we wouldn't need the blogs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zeke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well, I'm Convinced...
That most or all the WH press coprs is
on the WH payola payroll in some way
or fashion.

Guckert-Gannon news is everywhere, Bush holds
this morning's press conference, and not a single
reporter asked a single gannon question---nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hamlette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. I think corporate media is on the payroll too
This Gannon thing has been an education. They messed up the story on WMD so they wrung their hands and did a mea culpa and went right back to their old ways. Armstrong Williams came along and they treated it as if it were an isolated incident. Then Rather and Jordan and they treat it like the crime of the century forcing two "liberals" out of their jobs.

Now Gannon happnes and the corporate media types shoot the messenger. Bloggers. Because Gannon is a Bushie. (They fail to mention that the Rather and Jordan executions were driven by bloggers too.)

The BIGGEST eye opener, in the unlikely event there are people here as dense as I was, was John Stewart last night. Stewart got it exactly right. Or rather Ted Hitler did. Corporate media has its credibility and all the bloggers have is facts!

This is not a pat on the back to bloggers, although they VERY MUCH deserve it. This is a black eye for corporate media. Not only did they miss the story, when bloggers found the story, they covered it up.

Corporate media should realize that people may soon view them as propagandists with NO credibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Corporate media is not "on the payroll" - they are the ones who
want to run the FCC and try to eliminate the laws holding them back from having all the media.

One Nation, Under Rupert . . .

Remember, actual dollars are counted as "campaign contributions". How many times has Rush spun it that, while he was a "guest" of Bush41 and spent the night in the Lincoln bedroom, it didn't affect his "stance"? Boy, if you are invited to spend the night in a palace, for free, you sure as hell would swallow when that cock you're sucking on starts a-jumping . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #20
32. VERY well put -- thanks n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldtime dfl_er Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. and as watergate taught us...
in the coverup, often the crimes are the worst, and the most vulnerable for unravelling.

www.cafepress.com/showtheworld
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. The idea that a possible homosexual sits in the oval office...
...must be acting like kryptonite with most right-wingers. They are probably looking more closely at Bush's strange behaviors, mannerisms and ways of speaking and thinking, "Uhmmm....could we have actually voted a girlie man into the oval office?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
montanacowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Whistle - we have been saying this for 4 years
notice mannerisms - always touching, always loving the manly thing, kissing Lieberwhore, hugging, inappropriately -

what about Rove? is he closeted too? not married - no women in his life...

Is Gannon their boy toy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Rove is married
Edited on Thu Feb-17-05 12:45 PM by Blue_Roses
"...At this time, he married Valerie Wainright, a wealthy Houston woman from the Bush social circle, but the marriage could not withstand his consuming preoccupation with politics.(He married his second wife, Darby, in 1986.)"

more...



http://www.guardian.co.uk/uselections2004/story/0,13918,1165126,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Well, Rove is "married"
So was Michael Jackson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. more on Rove...pretty wicked ...
Edited on Thu Feb-17-05 12:54 PM by Blue_Roses
"Rove prepared for the harder edges of US politics by surviving his youth. Born on Christmas Day 1950 in Denver, Colorado, he grew up in or near the Rockies, where his father worked as a geologist. On his 19th birthday, his father walked out on him. Soon afterwards, he found out that he was not his father after all, the news dropped into a dinner-table conversation by his aunt and uncle. Twelve years later, alone in Reno, his mother committed suicide."

--snip--

"Like Dick Cheney, he avoided the Vietnam draft with a college deferment, but gave up his education to work on Republican campaigns, and never got a degree. He launched his political career by wresting control of the College Republicans, a radical group in the Nixon era. It was an unpleasant business. In an interesting precursor to the Florida battle 17 years later, Rove took on his opponent, Robert Edgeworth, principally on procedural grounds - challenging the credentials of every single Edgeworth delegate to the1973 College Republican convention and putting forward a rival delegate."

--snip--

"The aggressive tactics won the 22-year-old Rove a walk-on role in the Watergate saga that was consuming the nation. A report was published in the Washington Post on August 10, 1973, titled " Probes Official as Teacher of Tricks", gave an account, based on tape recordings, of how Rove and a colleague had been touring the country giving young Republicans political combat training, in which they recalled their feats of derring-do, such as Rove's Chicago heist at the Dixon headquarters..."

--snip--

"The incident marked the genesis of the Rove-Bush axis and it was in Washington that Rove met the younger Bush. He fell, politically speaking, in love. "Huge amounts of charisma, swagger, cowboy boots, flight jacket, wonderful smile, just charisma - you know, wow," Rove recalled years later. In 1977, Rove was sent to Texas, in theory to run a political action committee, but according to one Texan political consultant who knew him at the time, "It was really to baby-sit Bush back when Bush was drinking".

more...

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uselections2004/story/0,13918,1165126,00.html

_______

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susu369 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Thanks for posting
Today I was just thinking about that curious statement Rove had made and wishing I had a link.

The incident marked the genesis of the Rove-Bush axis and it was in Washington that Rove met the younger Bush. He fell, politically speaking, in love. "Huge amounts of charisma, swagger, cowboy boots, flight jacket, wonderful smile, just charisma - you know, wow," Rove recalled years later.

Hm-m-m-m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. I think he fell in love
with Bush and is still in love with him...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #19
27. His life has the makin's of a country western song
but he's still a dangerous , nasty little weasel..:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #9
24. Correct, so have I, I was just mouthing what RWs are saying...
...under their breaths and thinking in those few areas of their cerebral cortex where the synopses are still firing! By the way, if Bush decided to come out of the closet, I would have no problem what-so-ever with that, but I would still hold the same opinion of him and that is that he is a total A**hole!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. I posted yesterday that the dam has burst on the "MSM"
Things are going to change very quickly now. We need to keep pushing the fact that the corporate media is nothing but 24/7 BS. Gannon was a gift, and it's looking like the year of the Blog. Good news for everybody except BushCo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
julialnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. we need to write
Newspapers and TV programs with the same passion as we did over the Sinclaire matter. This could be the one thing that gets them. Where would they be if people knew the real news?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. My LTTE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zeke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Huh?
Where has the MSM dam burst?

Gannon is everywhere and not a single reporter
asked a single gannon question of Bush today?

Where's the MSM dam burst?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. You can't sense that they're scared shitless of the Blogs?
They're terrified, and rightly so.. To the point where they're actually asking themselves on-air why the Blogs are so popular. They're also spending more time wondering why they suck than reporting the biggest story in years, and people are starting to "get it". The corporate media has been outed. Last night's Daily Show was the final crack in the dam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
julialnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #16
26. But I still don't know why this story isn't everywhere
My fiancee is very political and hadn't even heard of this story until I told him. He watched the news last night trying to hear something about it it........nothing.
Luckily he saw a repeat of the Daily Show, but he was looking for the story. Most people aren't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
julialnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. how did he get in? Someone at Randi Rhodes looks into it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisabtrucking Donating Member (807 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
10. They have a lot to hide. When you start a lie that lie just keeps
getting bigger and bigger, until you don't remember what you said in the first place. They will get caught, sooner or later.<>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rndmprsn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
18. thanks...i'm sending similiar letters to my papers n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumpel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-17-05 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
25. well said.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
28. The last sentence in ABC's The Note is VERY telling:
Media:
Anne Kornblut finds that Ari Fleischer had doubts about Jeff Gannon and said he stopped calling on the man after a while. LINK

Why is it that most savvy Democrats think this story is going away, while some pretty plugged in Republicans say the opposite?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
julialnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. because the Dem's won't do anything about it
The Dem's are just going to sigh and say, oh darn, the media isn't going to cover this. They should GO TO THE MEDIA and scream, what the hell is going on with the propaganda!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. I have no idea what some of these Dems are smoking these days
It's as if they want to pretend they're above making any fuss over ANY scandal. Last time I checked, Republicans don't learn or lead by example.

I think it's interesting though that The Note says that plugged in Republicans don't think the story will go away anytime soon. It's encouraging to know they're worried.

And for what it's worth, the Howard Stern show was laughing about the story this morning. What we should do is pester the entertainment news shows like Entertainment Tonight...once a scandal is told on those horrible shows, they never die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #28
31. Cause Dems dont care about sex scandals but Republicans do.
The Republican base is going to demand that heads roll on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU GrovelBot  Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-18-05 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
33. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ##
==================
GROVELBOT.EXE v3.0
==================



This week is our first quarter 2005 fund drive. Democratic
Underground is a completely independent website. We depend almost entirely
on donations from our members to cover our costs. Thank you so much for
your support.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC