Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'Shock and awe' or shame and sorrow?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 09:12 PM
Original message
'Shock and awe' or shame and sorrow?
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/usatoday/20041217/cm_usatoday/shockandaweorshameandsorrow&cid=679&ncid=1501

When historians rate our secretaries of Defense of the past century, these two will go down as the worst:

Donald Rumsfeld, currently serving under Republican President George W. Bush.

Robert McNamara, who served under Democrat Presidents John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson.

McNamara earned his place in infamy by misleading us repeatedly about the ever-escalating war in Vietnam, which we ultimately lost. snip

After we belatedly pulled out of Vietnam, McNamara wrote his confessions in a best-selling book titled In Retrospect: The Tragedy and Lessons of Vietnam.

After Rumsfeld retires, he, too, likely will write a book. Will it be fiction, about how his shock and awe worked out, or will it be non-fiction, confessing to the shame and sorrow he and his cronies have caused us with their ill-advised, poorly planned and ineffectively executed expedition?

more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
manic expression Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not sure
would Rumsfeld be so ignorant to believe his policies were for the better? Probably, but there is a chance that he may be able to find the truth after a long time. McNamara saw the error in his ways, correct? Perhaps there is a remote chance of Rumsfeld doing the same. Either way, it won't really matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
classof56 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-17-04 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm guessing the answer is...no.
Rumsfeld, like everyone in the Bush administration, has a heart of stone, cares nothing about anyone or anything and is totally focused on his/their agenda: World domination, whatever it takes and with no regard for who or what gets demolished along the path. The shock and awe is underway and will not stop. The shame and sorrow will never be owned by Rumsfeld, Bush, Cheney, Wolfowitz, any of them. And before they are done, they will have made sure to rewrite history so that no future generations ever have a shot at knowing the truth.

As Orwell said: Ignorance is Strenth. Slavery is Freedom. War is Peace.

God help us all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC