Time Mag. Person of the Year narrowed to Rove, Bush, Gibson, Nancy Reagan

[wicket]

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/gossip/story/262920p-225079c.html

Psssst!: I hear that Time mag has narrowed down its Person of the Year choice - to be announced Sunday - to Mel Gibson, Nancy Reagan, President Bush, Karl Rove or the 9/11 Commission.


Wonderful choices there! :puke: :puke: :puke:

[liberal N proud]

1. I haven't believed in their choices for years!

I even dropped my subscription because of their choice, Now I can't remember who it was, but still most of their choices suck.
It should be the arrogant person of the year title.

[StClone]

2. Being on the Time cover is not a good thing necessarily.

It will be Rove. Infamy.

[pmbryant]

3. 9-11 Commission is only reasonable choice there

:shrug:

[wicket]

5. yeah but...

...I doubt they'll get it, it'll probably be Rove :puke: Bleh.

[Bethany Rockafella]

4. Can you imagine Rove on the cover?

Ugh! If I ever see them in the newstands, I'll turn them for the back to show.

[Coyul]

6. Never thought I would type this:

Nancy Reagan is the lesser evil.....man what shit this country has become!

[Liberty Belle]

7. Let's e-mail them to suggest Conyers, Arnebeck, &

the election fraud whistleblowers. Can someone please post Time's e-mail address so we can media blast this?

[hlthe2b]

8. I think they should just rename Hitler on behalf of all of em

(well, maybe not ALL of em) :eyes:

[rurallib]

10. Or a picture of Jesus Christ in tears?

"Someone's distorted my message really bad"

[Sara Beverley]

9. Time mag? Who cares?

Failed leaders always manage to reward themselves. Whatever mess there is in government across the world, just ask yourselves whose been in charge.

[oc2002]

11. I vote for the faceless 'Insurgents' in Iraq, as man of the year.

They are proving to be far more formidable than anticipated, and will make this war bloodier and costlier to a war of wills and pocket books. Will America go broke fighting for someone elses Democracy?

Rove, nothing new, he is slime and realy it was the Ohio secratary Blackwell, that delivered the election on a silver plater.

Bush, pfft, the guy is still just a two bit Texan brat politician(punk).

Nancy, just leave her be.

[Orangepeel]

12. it OUGHT to be rove

given their stated criteria. It isn't supposed to be the most admirable or most honorable person of the year. It is supposed to be the most influential, for good or for evil.

rove is the architect of events that will fuck the world for decades. of course he was the most influential of the year.

[wicket]

14. good point

n/t

[Trailrider1951]

13. What, no Michael Moore????

:evilgrin:

[genieroze]

15. Yeah well, didn't they have Hitler one year? eom

[dansolo]

16. I want it to be Rove.

Shine a little light on that cockroach.

[wicket]

17. kick

:kick:

[jmowreader]

18. The person of the year should be Kenneth Blackwell...

Time says the Person of the Year is the person who most changed the course of history, for good or evil.

For his part in rigging the 2004 election and assuring the world of another four years of Bush, Kenneth Blackwell is the only acceptable choice.

[BrklynLiberal]

19. Bush, and Hitler again...showing parallels. n/t

Rethought it thru..

[ThorsHammer]

20. I don't think it's necessarily an honor

I might be wrong here, but I always thought it was given to the person who had the most influence over the past year, good or bad. I'm pretty sure they considered Osama in 2001, and probably considered Hitler way back.