|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Th1onein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-24-04 04:18 PM Original message |
Bush buying time 'til hijacked planes hit government targets on 911 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HysteryDiagnosis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-24-04 04:26 PM Response to Original message |
1. Okay, put on your tinfoil hats, folks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ck4829 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-24-04 04:26 PM Response to Original message |
2. Seems strange |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-24-04 04:29 PM Response to Original message |
3. Deleted message |
Pepperbelly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-24-04 04:33 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Not himself?!?!?!? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Th1onein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-24-04 04:35 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. You know it would be REALLY good if you could support your points. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bahrbearian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-24-04 04:36 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. More like 907 men, so far. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-24-04 04:45 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. Did you mispell your sig line on purpose? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DrBB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-24-04 04:48 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. That would be Dufresne, actually |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ElsewheresDaughter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-24-04 04:52 PM Response to Reply #3 |
13. never mind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mckara (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-24-04 04:36 PM Response to Original message |
6. I don't think Bush is capable of complex planning... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-24-04 04:49 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. Bush had his role and his cue marks to hit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newyawker99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-24-04 08:17 PM Response to Reply #6 |
20. Hi mckara!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-24-04 04:50 PM Response to Original message |
11. I agree 100% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nostamj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-24-04 04:50 PM Response to Original message |
12. "EXACTLY when Flight 77 hit the Pentagon" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Th1onein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-24-04 05:57 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Actually, others report between 9:34 and 9:38AM that the plane hit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joanne (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-24-04 06:01 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Except who believes it really was a plane that hit the Pentagon? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Th1onein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-24-04 06:04 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. I think that the idea that it was a missile is a red herring. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-24-04 06:18 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. That's irrelevent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nostamj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-24-04 06:33 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. "no pentagon plane" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
genius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-24-04 06:06 PM Response to Original message |
17. You're right. Time for the gullible to wake up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 12th 2024, 10:11 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC