Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

c-span 2 ..(from 7-7-04) DRE session.. I think repubes are scared too

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-04 02:58 PM
Original message
c-span 2 ..(from 7-7-04) DRE session.. I think repubes are scared too
Could it be that they fear that "hackers" might be able to take THEIR votes too???

The whole DRE thing is BI-PARTISAN...and it needs to go..

The whole reason for all the hoo-haw about ballots is because states and districts clog up their elections with tons of ballot initiatives, that LOTS of people do not even care about..

Most people go to vote for senator/congresspeople/president..

Most people don't care that much about the rest, so the obvious solution is a SINGLE PIECE of PAPER..and an indelible MARKING PEN..

name.........
name.........
name.........
name.........


mark the one you vote for...

these would fit in a SINGLE COLUMN

a second page for all the ballot initiatives..
if they choose to NOT vote on them, oh well.. Lots of those initiatives are bullshit issues anyway..paid for by corporate interests..


WHY IS THIS SO DAMN HARD?????????

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Philostopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-04 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's amazing, isn't it?
As paranoid as some conservatives are about so many things, that it didn't occur to them earlier that hackers might not all hack for Republicans, I mean. If they sit down and think about all the 'script kiddies' they read about, it should scare the daylights out of them, too. If this stuff is so vulnerable to tampering, it smells funny that they think Republicans are the only ones who can tamper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-04 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. At a Meet-up in May...........
one of the other attendees stated that we didn't have to worry about the repubs stealing electronically cast votes in the election this year because the Democrats have better hackers : ^ )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-04 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I think that's what they finally realized..
Edited on Fri Jul-23-04 04:07 PM by SoCalDem
:evilgrin:

It just anoys me to no end..that they keep droning on and on..Paper..Pen..lockbox.. why make it more difficult..??

300 people in a precinct.. 200 show up to vote.. 200 ballots..

a chalk board.. a piece of chalk.. counters and watchers.. two locks on the box.. a dem has one key...and repube has one key...

problem solved :)

the initiatives and "other" issues on the second ballot can bu run thru an optical scan machine later.. What's the BIG deal???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philostopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-04 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I have a German friend on an arts mailing list.
Edited on Fri Jul-23-04 04:48 PM by nownow
He says they still vote this way in the Munich 'burbs -- paper ballot, felt tip pen, lockbox. He can't understand why we'd want to do it any other way, and I'm inclined to agree with him.

Here in my precinct we use punch cards with a stylus. It's the first place I ever voted that did it precisely that way -- I've done lever-pull everywhere else -- but I have to say even that isn't too bad, as long as they keep their counts straight. In the voting, at least, I don't see much margin for 'user error' or messing up, and I've never had a voting box so full you couldn't punch all the way through the ballot. That shouldn't ever be a problem, though I know it was in some places in 2000 (heard horror stories that in some places there were several elections' worth of chads in the box, etc.).

On edit -- no 'buttefly ballots' here -- the issues/candidates are only on one side of each ballot card.

There are four poll-watchers for each precinct of about a thousand, here. One checks your name against the book while the other witnesses your signature; the third hands you the ballot and the fourth watches you put it in the bag. It ain't supposed to be rocket science. Our ballot pads here are numbered, so barring an unusual number of spoiled ballots, you should be able to come within ten percent of a total by the end of the night simply by checking the pad numbers against the voter manifests.

I don't know if they hand-count or machine-count them, but the way the machines we use are designed, it's pretty difficult to spoil or 'dimple' a ballot -- the stylus goes all the way through.

But you're absolutely right that simply doing a numbered pad of ballots and marking them with an indelible marker would solve any possible fraud. It works in Germany, I know that much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-23-04 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. The Canadian federal elections
were just held nationally using paper ballots. It was all counted and the results known in time for the 11 p.m. news (in B.C. anyway, your timezone may vary).

Of course it's a lot simpler in a Parliamentary system. Pick your party, then mark off one candidate with an X (you can get away with a checkmark or filling it).

Ballot initiatives and all that other crap are held in other elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC