Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Early Iraqi Handover because of F 9/11????

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
The Sushi Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 12:11 PM
Original message
Early Iraqi Handover because of F 9/11????
So the news today is not about the film taking #1 over the weekend????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. That thought crossed my mind too
EVERYTHING this admin does is for political reasons
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Sushi Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. My point exactly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DenverDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. Their agenda is pretty transparent, isn't it?
All about managing the propaganda cycle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. Very possible
They're in constant damage control mode anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bok_Tukalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. Weird thought while reading SCOTUS decision
If I were Saddam's lawyers, I would file a petition of habeas corpus today if we had not turned over Iraq to the interim government.

Or I may be reading this wrong.

<<Held: United States courts have jurisdiction to consider challenges to the legality of the detention of foreign nationals captured abroad in connection with hostilities and incarcerated at Guantanamo Bay. Pp. 4-17.

(a) The District Court has jurisdiction to hear petitioners' habeas challenges under 28 U. S. C. §2241, which authorizes district courts, "within their respective jurisdictions," to entertain habeas applications by persons claiming to be held "in custody in violation of the ... laws ... of the United States," §§2241(a), (c)(3). SUCH JURISTICTION EXTENDS TO ALIENS HELD IN A TERRITORY OVER WHICH THE UNITED STATES EXERCISES PLENARY AND EXCLUSIVE JURISTDICTION, BUT NOT "ULTIMATE SOVEREIGNTY." Pp. 4-16.>>

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/getcase.pl?court=US&navby=case&vol=000&invol=03-334
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Th1onein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-28-04 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. You got it!
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC