|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Minstrel Boy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-04 07:06 AM Original message |
New bombshell: on 9/11 Pentagon conducted live-fly hijacking wargame |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jeff30997 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-04 07:28 AM Response to Original message |
1. This thing gets more and more complex. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indepat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-04 07:58 AM Response to Reply #1 |
6. More curiouser and curiouser |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PATRICK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-04 07:33 AM Response to Original message |
2. That in itself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Q (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-04 07:46 AM Response to Original message |
3. The problem with not trusting someone... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w13rd0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-04 07:48 AM Response to Original message |
4. So let's review... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
teryang (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-04 07:52 AM Response to Original message |
5. This was the tactical cover and deception plan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
indepat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-04 08:03 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Surely you realize what this means if your assessment is valid: and it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
teryang (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-04 08:35 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. I should add the caveat that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-04 08:57 AM Response to Original message |
9. Here's one of the flies in the ointment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Minstrel Boy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-04 09:06 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. I think the answer is that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-04 09:25 AM Response to Reply #11 |
13. How fast do these fighters fly? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Media_Lies_Daily (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-04 04:36 PM Response to Reply #13 |
29. Top speed is 1400 to 1500 mph. None of the four planes dispatched.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MasonJar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-04 04:34 PM Response to Reply #11 |
28. We only needed 3 or 4. What kind of military would not keep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-04 09:05 AM Response to Original message |
10. This is interesting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-04 09:32 AM Response to Reply #10 |
14. Makes you wonder |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmylips (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-04 09:08 AM Response to Original message |
12. The more I read about that criminal Chalabi... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-04 03:51 PM Response to Reply #12 |
21. Deleted message |
Justice (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-04 09:44 AM Response to Original message |
15. I may have missed this but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tinanator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-04 09:58 AM Response to Reply #15 |
16. I think you are short a few options there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Minstrel Boy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-04 10:08 AM Response to Reply #15 |
17. Given what else we know, such as Pentagon brass cancelling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wiggs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-04 10:13 AM Response to Original message |
18. Rice |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Minstrel Boy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-04 02:32 PM Response to Reply #18 |
19. Yes, as the Good Ship Condileeza said, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Octafish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-04 10:31 PM Response to Reply #19 |
37. Vigilant Deniability |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
teryang (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-04 03:13 PM Response to Original message |
20. Not likely? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wiggs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-04 05:05 PM Response to Reply #20 |
35. likely.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rockasan (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-04 03:52 PM Response to Original message |
22. The REAL problem with all of this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
teryang (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-04 04:06 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. 3 posts and he's numb n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RamboLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-04 04:06 PM Response to Original message |
23. Richard Clarke in his book confirms Vigilant Warrior on 9-11 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kiahzero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-04 04:38 PM Response to Reply #23 |
30. Where would they shoot it down? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Media_Lies_Daily (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-04 04:48 PM Response to Reply #30 |
31. Take a look at the flight paths of Flights 77 and 93.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kiahzero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-04 04:50 PM Response to Reply #31 |
33. There was no reason to shoot them down before they hit the Towers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sterling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-04 02:25 AM Response to Reply #33 |
39. There was a lot of time between the first WTC attack and the DC attack |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RamboLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-04 04:48 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. They would've had to take their chances |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kiahzero (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-04 04:54 PM Response to Reply #32 |
34. I think it's hard to say on that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DoYouEverWonder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-04 06:03 AM Response to Reply #23 |
40. So how the heck is it possible for Myers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Backlash Cometh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-04 04:12 PM Response to Original message |
25. If true, it sounds like Al Qaeda had good intelligence. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alerter_ (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-04 04:17 PM Response to Original message |
26. I remember this story immediately after 911 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lockdown (576 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-04 04:22 PM Response to Original message |
27. Press release on Northern Vigilance |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daleo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-04 06:25 PM Response to Original message |
36. If this is really true, then it means one of two things |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreakinDJ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-31-04 10:50 PM Response to Reply #36 |
38. This determines the difference of LIHOP vs: MIHOP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PATRICK (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-04 09:54 AM Response to Reply #38 |
42. decisive detail |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
9215 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-04 09:41 AM Response to Original message |
41. If and when the Bushies are pressed for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun Apr 28th 2024, 03:52 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC