Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kerry VP Rumor

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
The empressof all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 09:28 AM
Original message
Kerry VP Rumor
Edited on Sat May-29-04 09:38 AM by Wubette
Perhaps I was still asleep but I heard this morning on my news radio station that Chuck Hagel (Rep) is being considered by Kerry team for VP. Report indicated that he was very ambitious, a veteran, and apparently open to the idea. Heard it on 1000 AM in Seattle. I did quick google search for more info but couldn't find a link.
Anyone hear anything more about this.

Not an endorsement on my part-I support Clark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. Republican. Not a chance. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. I haven't heard...
but I don't know that much about him so I can't even give an opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. DU historians -- have we ever in US history had such rampant rumors
Edited on Sat May-29-04 09:36 AM by Straight Shooter
of one political party candidate choosing a veep from the other party?

I'm getting a wee bit tired of these rumors. It makes kerry look weak, as if he can't be trusted to make it on his own unless he's buttressed by a big Repub name. It makes the Dem party appear indecisive and nonconfident. There are plenty of great individuals within kerry's party that he can choose from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I would imagine it happened at least once before
Abe Lincoln, a Republican, had Andrew Johnson, a Democrat on his ticket in 1864.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. I am not history-savvy. Were the party differences as stark as currently?
Maybe they had more common ground. There is so much rancor between Dems and Repubs, I would prefer that the Dems hold their ground, otherwise it looks like we're throwing the Repubs a really big juicy bone. And if anything happens to kerry, there we are with a Repub in the Oval Office again.

Just my .02.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dsc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #10
20. The big difference back then
was the role of African Americans in society. I presume that Johnson was less pro slavery than the majority of Demcorats were in his day but that was a big issue between the parties. When Johnson took office there were constant disputes between he and the Republican Congress over the extent to which the South would have to permit African Americans to participate in citizenship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #10
37. As stark as today?
Yeah kind of. When Lincoln, the first Republican president got elected, the southern Democrats said that's it, we're out of here. I guess that would qualify as stark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alerter_ Donating Member (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. it's either really smart or really stupid
If they are smart, it's positioning Kerry in the center and drawing non-wingnut Republicans away from the Bush regime.

If they aren't smart, it's running the Republican campaign for them and giving GOP stars free good publicity.

Which is it? I guess we'll find out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. I'm not a historian, but there are plenty of good Democrats who
I'm not a historian, but there are plenty of good Democrats who can serve as vp. We don't need a Republican vp in 2005.

We've had a Repbulican vp for 3 1/2 years, and I haven't liked it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanger Donating Member (737 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. It makes him look strong enough to be inclusive n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
7. I heard another rumor: Kerry is secretly building a ranch in Crawford, TX
No shit!

I read it on the internet, so it must be true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catch22Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
8. I have mixed feelings on these Repuke vp rumors
On one hand, I won't have a repuke VP. No way Jose.

On the other hand, these rumors may serve to lure moderate repukes, who have never considered Kerry, to at least give Kerry the ol' once over. Perhaps when they do, they'll realize Kerry is the better choice. Then Kerry can pick a good Dem as VP and these moderate repukes will already have made their minds up to dump Bush. So, it could be the means to a very nice end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
koopie57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #8
17. If these rumors are serving a purpose
fine, but to humiliate all the democrats who he has worked with over the years and who have proven themselves strong, trustworthy, intelligent, by selecting a republican running mate just makes my skin crawl. It seems disloyal and arrogant. In eight years, this republican will be running for president. The democrats can work together and win this if they stay united. For crying out loud, look at what they are running against. Put a teletubby in a good expensive suit and one of them could win. They really don't need to go crawling to the republicans once again. I want to see confidence and a damn backbone or nothing will have changed after all we have been through and fought against. If we want to show nonpartison , start rumors about McCain as secretary of defense or republicans filling certain roles in the administration, but to pick one as a running mate just seems like we don't have enough qualified people on our own side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kstewart33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
9. He would be an interesting choice
And could be a winner. I have great respect for Hagel, for his military record, and for his courage in his outspokeness about Bush's foreign policy and Iraq policy. Hagel is a good man. I hope the rumor is true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. If Hagel switched parties, I think I could get behind him.. Of course..
it would depend on where he has been on Democratic issues, such as Pro Choice, Affirmative Action, Civil Unions, the ecology, etc... If he's on the right side of these issues and switches parties, I could get behind this. He seems to be very on edge about bushco and their policies. Who knows. Maybe he's courting Kerry.

:tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheFarseer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
11. You have to understand I'm from Nebraska
so I would be doing backflips if this turned out to be true. Hagel barely trys to hide the fact that he truely dislikes Bush and would love nothing better than to totally fuck him over. That being said, this would be a huge gamble for Chuck and I'm not sure he would do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
24. You are right. Hagel obviously cannot stand Bush. Any chance..
that he would switch parties to run as V.P?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
12. Why do this?
First McCain, now Hagel?

THEY ARE REPUBLICANS!

It's reported that Hagel dislikes Bush, but that should make us want a Republican just a heartbeat away from the Presidency?

Nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
27. What if he became a Democrat? I agree. Absolutely no fusion ticket...
Edited on Sat May-29-04 12:58 PM by Kahuna
And, McCain is obviously too conservative to be considered. If Kerry selected McCain it would be a huge mistake because it would alienate the progressive base who actually care about the issues. But a moderate (I'm assuming Hagel is, don't know if he is) who would switch parties would be a devasting blow to bushco. Also, Hagel is damned attractive and personable. Wouldn't hurt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
28. I think the point is...
uniting the country. I don't know anything about Hagel policy wise, but it's not about him or Kerry. It's about giving the country leadership it can trust and respect. I think this talk is a sign of how desperate people are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. He is anti-choice, anti-tax, anti-environment, very pro-defense spending
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. Ewww. I guess not then..
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Under extraordinary circumstances, this can be supported
The circumstances under which a national unity ticket could be considered are unlikely, but not implausible.

I would not support one at this time. That could change, but it isn't likely to. It is not a bad thing to discuss.

See post 19.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
13. Seems to me that the continued Repub VP
look-sees only show a short term vision...that is, to win the election. Since the VP presides as a tie-breaking vote, having a Repub in the chair (even under a Dem President) could be very risky business for passing laws and conducting business of the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The empressof all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. not necessarily-but I'm cynical
The VP serves at the pleasure of the President and in true political mode it would not serve his/her interests to vote against White House preference. These folks know which side their bread is buttered and if it were Hagel or any other Republican they would follow the game plan as part of the signing agreement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #15
30. "The VP serves at the pleasure of the President "????
I don't think so.

--IMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
16. Chuck Hagel? That's Not How You Spell Wes Clark
Our next VP will be Wes Clark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JorgeTheGood Donating Member (736 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
18. Hagel = Diebold n/t


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #18
29. That would be a plus for us. Yes?
Edited on Sat May-29-04 01:00 PM by Kahuna
:evilgrin: Reason enough to consider Hagel if he would become a Democrat to run with Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #29
38. But why would he do it?
He'd throw away his future in the Republican, and as a pro-life tax cutter, he'd have no future in the Democratic Party. Makes no sense to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
19. I don't think so, but let's keep an open mind
If the convention were to be held today, it is almost certain that Kerry would choose a fellow Democrat as his running mate.

The convention is being held in July.

The Bush junta is full of surprises, almost all unpleasant ones aimed at undermining American democracy. Let's consider a fantastic, extremely unlikely scenario that would be ludicrous from any other administration in American history except this one.

Let's say we catch Bush plotting to circumvent the election and remaining in power in spite of being rejected by voters. Support for Bush would then become untenable, regardless of one's personal ideology. Among the pundits, only the disreputable ones would stand by him. Coulter would support him, maybe Limbaugh and Hannity, but not Will and probably not Novak and definitely not Safire. Among Congressmen, he will get support from DeLay and Inhofe, but moderate Republicans like Chaffee, Snowe, Collins and Christopher Shea and sober conservatives like Hagel and McCain would drop him like a bad habit and openly support Kerry.

Under those circumstances, a national unity ticket with Kerry for President and a sober conservative Republican like Hagel or McCain for Vice President would be an excellent idea. It would do what is really necessary in American politics: restore the balance that yuppie fascists and neo-conservatives have upset. It would make it clear that there is a difference between a conservative, with whom we can have a dialog, and a fascist, who wants to put anybody who disagrees with him behind barbed wire at Gitmo. It would marginalize the fascists once and all.

It would not last. It would not be intended to last. However, it just might heal the wounds that the Bushies have inflicted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KC21304 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
21. For Sec. of Defense in a minute but not VP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
22. Hagel would have one advantage
At least his voting machines wouldn't be programmed to vote for Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #22
31. Hel-lo!!!! Wouldn't that be a kick in the pants to bushco?
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
25. I have heard that before.
I Don't much about Hagel except he is a stand up guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
26. I'm putting my foot down!
No Republican VPs for Kerry.

That's it! We shall no longer entertain these thoughts.

--IMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eileen Donating Member (150 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #26
35. Hagel - Just like McCain is another PIG
That's PIG meaning Pro Involuntary Gestator.

McCain is one of the sponsors of the - Phantom Procedure Scam - {called 'PBA' by the PIGs in the Anti Abortion Propaganda Industry (AAPI)} and Hagel has spoken in favor of such bans both in his home state and in the Senate. His anti-choice stand for women in the services requiring an abortion is just another unsurmountable negative for him.

The women of this country and in fact this world have had more of these PIGs than they can stand and it will take decades to undo the damage and regain the rights these misogynists have removed and trampled.

Get this straight rumor mill. We want NO FUCKING PIG REPUGNANTS on the ticket.

- Eileen`s always in process page -


Eileen

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pathwalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
36. Is it too much to ask for a damn DEMOCRAT for VP?
If I wanted a Republican on the Democratic ticket, I'd just as soon vote Repuke. I WON'T VOTE FOR A REPUBLICAN - especially one on the Democratic ticket!!! Got it??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
39. "Rumor"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surfermaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
40. Republican talk
That is all it is just like McCain people fighting for McCain in my opinion are republicans in sheep clothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
41. Another IGNORANT rumor started by someone that understands that...
...quite a few Democrats are gullible as hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kstewart33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #41
43. I hope the rumor is true
Hagel would make a fine VP. Forget his record. That's not what this is about. This is about isolating the far right, and more importantly, about trying to unite the country behind a bipartisan leadership.

Now that's a concept isn't it? Sounds like a fine one to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-29-04 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
42. It's a silly rumor
and I think Hagel has said he's not interested (though I think he does get along well with Kerry).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC