DO NOT ERASE HISTORY. Abu Ghraib should've been left standing and intact.
What is the rush to destroy it? It only serves the needs of those doing damage control. I will read the Abu Graib thread and I am sure that others here have already voiced this notion.
Must destroy evidence before June 30Must destroy evidence before June 30Must destroy evidence before June 30Must destroy evidence before June 30Must destroy evidence before June 30Must destroy evidence before June 30Must destroy evidence before June 30Must destroy evidence before June 30Must destroy evidence before June 30Must destroy evidence before June 30Must destroy evidence before June 30Must destroy evidence before June 30Must destroy evidence before June 30Must destroy evidence before June 30
if they had done it at the beginning to send a clear message that we are different from saddam and thugs. Sadly, we used it to torture and humiliate Iraqis much like he did (It's all part of winning hearts and minds) and pulling it down now is merely a way for us to try to save face. I don't think it's gonna work, do you?
4. tearing down would be great BUT building another to replace is
ridiculous......they have spent more time on building prisons and bases than anything to help the people....put them to work...instead of putting them in prison.....usa prison system doesn't work...why do we think it is a good idea over there.....
It smacks of destroying the evidence so as to negate that the crimes ever occurred. Would have been better to keep as a museum of the horrors of warmongering and torture.
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.